Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, Brazil.
J Physiol. 2018 May 15;596(10):1999-2016. doi: 10.1113/JP275881. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
Previous work demonstrated an effect of a single high-intensity exercise bout coupled with motor practice on the retention of a newly acquired skilled arm movement, in both neurologically intact and impaired adults. In the present study, using behavioural and computational analyses we demonstrated that a single exercise bout, regardless of its intensity and timing, did not increase the retention of a novel locomotor task after stroke. Considering both present and previous work, we postulate that the benefits of exercise effect may depend on the type of motor learning (e.g. skill learning, sensorimotor adaptation) and/or task (e.g. arm accuracy-tracking task, walking).
Acute high-intensity exercise coupled with motor practice improves the retention of motor learning in neurologically intact adults. However, whether exercise could improve the retention of locomotor learning after stroke is still unknown. Here, we investigated the effect of exercise intensity and timing on the retention of a novel locomotor learning task (i.e. split-belt treadmill walking) after stroke. Thirty-seven people post stroke participated in two sessions, 24 h apart, and were allocated to active control (CON), treadmill walking (TMW), or total body exercise on a cycle ergometer (TBE). In session 1, all groups exercised for a short bout (∼5 min) at low (CON) or high (TMW and TBE) intensity and before (CON and TMW) or after (TBE) the locomotor learning task. In both sessions, the locomotor learning task was to walk on a split-belt treadmill in a 2:1 speed ratio (100% and 50% fast-comfortable walking speed) for 15 min. To test the effect of exercise on 24 h retention, we applied behavioural and computational analyses. Behavioural data showed that neither high-intensity group showed greater 24 h retention compared to CON, and computational data showed that 24 h retention was attributable to a slow learning process for sensorimotor adaptation. Our findings demonstrated that acute exercise coupled with a locomotor adaptation task, regardless of its intensity and timing, does not improve retention of the novel locomotor task after stroke. We postulate that exercise effects on motor learning may be context specific (e.g. type of motor learning and/or task) and interact with the presence of genetic variant (BDNF Val66Met).
先前的研究表明,单次高强度运动与运动练习相结合,可改善神经完整和受损成年人新获得的熟练手臂运动的保持。在本研究中,我们使用行为和计算分析表明,单次运动,无论其强度和时间如何,都不会增加中风后新运动任务的保持。考虑到目前和以前的工作,我们假设运动效果的益处可能取决于运动学习的类型(例如技能学习,感觉运动适应)和/或任务(例如手臂准确性跟踪任务,行走)。
急性高强度运动与运动练习相结合可改善神经完整成年人的运动学习保持。然而,运动是否可以改善中风后的运动学习保持尚不清楚。在这里,我们研究了运动强度和时间对中风后新运动学习任务(即分裂带跑步机行走)保持的影响。37 名中风后患者参加了两个间隔 24 小时的会话,并被分配到主动对照组(CON),跑步机行走组(TMW)或全身自行车测力计上的运动组(TBE)。在第 1 次会议中,所有组均进行了短暂的运动(约 5 分钟),运动强度低(CON)或高(TMW 和 TBE),运动前(CON 和 TMW)或运动后(TBE)进行运动学习任务。在两个会议中,运动学习任务都是在分裂带跑步机上以 2:1 的速度比(100%和 50%舒适快速行走速度)行走 15 分钟。为了测试运动对 24 小时保留的影响,我们进行了行为和计算分析。行为数据表明,与 CON 相比,高强度组在 24 小时内的保留率均没有更高,计算数据表明,24 小时的保留率归因于感觉运动适应的缓慢学习过程。我们的研究结果表明,急性运动与运动适应任务相结合,无论其强度和时间如何,都不会改善中风后新运动任务的保持。我们假设运动对运动学习的影响可能是特定于上下文的(例如运动学习的类型和/或任务),并且与遗传变异(BDNF Val66Met)的存在相互作用。