• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直肠癌单对接全机器人手术:单中心经验

Single-Docking Full Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Single-Center Experience.

作者信息

Alfieri Sergio, Di Miceli Dario, Menghi Roberta, Cina Caterina, Fiorillo Claudio, Prioli Francesca, Rosa Fausto, Doglietto Giovanni B, Quero Giuseppe

机构信息

1 Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Surg Innov. 2018 Jun;25(3):258-266. doi: 10.1177/1553350618765868. Epub 2018 Mar 26.

DOI:10.1177/1553350618765868
PMID:29577829
Abstract

PURPOSE

Robotic surgery has gradually gained importance in the treatment of rectal cancer. However, recent studies have not shown any advantages when compared with laparoscopy. The objective of this study is to report a single surgeon's experience in robotic rectal surgery focusing on short-term and long-term outcomes.

METHODS

Sixty consecutive robotic rectal resections for adenocarcinoma, over a 4-year period, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients' characteristics and perioperative outcomes were analyzed. Oncological outcomes and surgical resection quality as well as overall and disease-free survival were also assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty patients out of 60 (50%) underwent neoadjuvant therapy. Anterior rectal resection was performed in 52 cases (86.7%), and abdominoperineal resection was done in 8 cases (13.3%). Mean operative time was 283 (±68.6) minutes. The conversion rate was 5% (3 patients). Postoperative complications occurred in 10 cases (16.7%), and reoperation was required in 1 case (1.7%). Mean hospital stay was 9 days, while 30-day mortality was 1.7% (1 patients). The histopathological analysis reported a negative circumferential radial margin and distal margins in 100% of cases with a complete or near complete total mesorectal excision in 98.3% of patients. Mean follow-up was 32.8 months with a recurrence rate of 3.4% (2 patients). Overall survival and disease-free survival were 94% and 87%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic surgery for rectal cancer proves to be safe and feasible when performed by highly skilled surgeons. It offers acceptable perioperative outcomes with a conversion rate notably lower than with the laparoscopic approach. Adequate pathological results and long-term oncological outcomes were also obtained.

摘要

目的

机器人手术在直肠癌治疗中逐渐变得重要。然而,近期研究表明与腹腔镜手术相比并无任何优势。本研究的目的是报告一位外科医生在机器人直肠癌手术方面的经验,重点关注短期和长期结果。

方法

回顾性分析了在4年期间连续进行的60例机器人辅助直肠癌腺癌切除术。分析了患者的特征和围手术期结果。还评估了肿瘤学结果、手术切除质量以及总生存率和无病生存率。

结果

60例患者中有30例(50%)接受了新辅助治疗。52例(86.7%)进行了直肠前切除术,8例(13.3%)进行了腹会阴联合切除术。平均手术时间为283(±68.6)分钟。中转率为5%(3例患者)。10例(16.7%)发生术后并发症,1例(1.7%)需要再次手术。平均住院时间为9天,30天死亡率为1.7%(1例患者)。组织病理学分析显示,100%的病例切缘阴性,98.3%的患者实现了完整或接近完整的直肠系膜全切除。平均随访32.8个月,复发率为3.4%(2例患者)。总生存率和无病生存率分别为94%和87%。

结论

由高技能外科医生进行的机器人直肠癌手术被证明是安全可行的。它提供了可接受的围手术期结果,中转率明显低于腹腔镜手术方法。还获得了充分的病理结果和长期肿瘤学结果。

相似文献

1
Single-Docking Full Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Single-Center Experience.直肠癌单对接全机器人手术:单中心经验
Surg Innov. 2018 Jun;25(3):258-266. doi: 10.1177/1553350618765868. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
2
Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.机器人与腹腔镜直肠切除术用于保留肛门手术:单中心 130 例连续患者的病理和短期结果分析。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):4085-4091. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5455-7. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
3
Robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision with the single-docking technique for patients with rectal cancer.采用单对接技术的机器人辅助全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌患者。
BMC Surg. 2017 Dec 5;17(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12893-017-0315-x.
4
The long-term oncological outcomes of the 140 robotic sphincter-saving total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a single surgeon experience.140例机器人保留括约肌全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的长期肿瘤学结局:单中心经验
J Robot Surg. 2020 Aug;14(4):655-661. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-01037-7. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
5
Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure.经肛门入路机器人辅助吻合术联合或不联合经肛门内外括约肌间切除术治疗低位直肠癌:先经肛门入路,再行机器人手术。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Jan;19(1):154-5. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1952-4. Epub 2011 Aug 6.
6
Oncologic and Clinicopathologic Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer.机器人辅助直肠癌全直肠系膜切除术的肿瘤学及临床病理结果
Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Jul;58(7):659-67. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000385.
7
Long-term oncological outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision of mid-low rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy.新辅助放化疗后机器人与腹腔镜中低位直肠癌全直肠系膜切除术的长期肿瘤学结局
Surg Endosc. 2017 Apr;31(4):1728-1737. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5165-6. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
8
Robotic rectal resection: oncologic outcomes.机器人直肠切除术:肿瘤学结果。
Updates Surg. 2021 Jun;73(3):1081-1091. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00911-6. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
9
Total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: Laparoscopic vs robotic surgery.中低位直肠癌的全直肠系膜切除术:腹腔镜手术与机器人手术对比
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Apr 7;22(13):3602-10. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i13.3602.
10
Short- and long-term outcomes of robotic surgery for rectal cancer: a single-center retrospective cohort study.机器人直肠癌手术的短期和长期疗效:单中心回顾性队列研究。
Surg Today. 2020 Mar;50(3):240-247. doi: 10.1007/s00595-019-01874-x. Epub 2019 Sep 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Robotic rectal resection: oncologic outcomes.机器人直肠切除术:肿瘤学结果。
Updates Surg. 2021 Jun;73(3):1081-1091. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00911-6. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
2
Open versus minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer: a single-center cohort study on 237 consecutive patients.开腹与微创直肠肿瘤切除术治疗直肠肿瘤的单中心队列研究:连续 237 例患者分析。
Updates Surg. 2019 Sep;71(3):493-504. doi: 10.1007/s13304-019-00642-3. Epub 2019 Mar 13.