• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人直肠切除术:肿瘤学结果。

Robotic rectal resection: oncologic outcomes.

机构信息

Digestive Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS di Roma, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.

Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Roma, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Updates Surg. 2021 Jun;73(3):1081-1091. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00911-6. Epub 2020 Nov 10.

DOI:10.1007/s13304-020-00911-6
PMID:33170489
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8184562/
Abstract

Robotic surgery has progressively gained popularity in the treatment of rectal cancer. However, only a few studies on its oncologic effectiveness are currently present, with contrasting results. The purpose of this study is to report a single surgeon's experience on robotic rectal resection (RRR) for cancer, focusing on the analysis of oncologic outcomes, both in terms of pathological features and long-term results. One-hundred and twenty-two consecutive patients who underwent RRR for rectal cancer from January 2013 to December 2019 were retrospectively enrolled. Patients' characteristics and perioperative outcomes were collected. The analyzed oncologic outcomes were pathological features [distal (DM), circumferential margin (CRM) status and quality of mesorectal excision (TME)] and long-term outcomes [overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS)]. The mean operative time was 275 (± 60.5) minutes. Conversion rate was 6.6%. Complications occurred in 27 cases (22.1%) and reoperation was needed in 2 patients (1.5%). The median follow-up was 30.5 (5.9-86.1) months. None presented DM positivity. CRM positivity was 2.5% (2 cases) while a complete TME was reached in 94.3% of cases (115 patients). Recurrence rate was 5.7% (2 local, 4 distant and 1 local plus distant tumor relapse). OS and DFS were 90.7% and 83%, respectively. At the multivariate analysis, both CRM positivity and near complete/incomplete TME were recognized as negative prognostic factors for OS and DFS. Under appropriate logistic and operative conditions, robotic surgery for rectal cancer proves to be oncologically effective, with adequate pathological results and long-term outcomes. It also offers acceptable peri-operative outcomes, further confirming the safety and feasibility of the technique.

摘要

机器人手术在直肠癌治疗中逐渐普及。然而,目前仅有少数关于其肿瘤学疗效的研究,结果存在差异。本研究旨在报告一位外科医生在机器人直肠切除术(RRR)治疗直肠癌方面的经验,重点分析肿瘤学结果,包括病理特征和长期结果。2013 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月,连续 122 例接受 RRR 治疗的直肠癌患者被回顾性纳入研究。收集患者的特征和围手术期结果。分析的肿瘤学结果包括病理特征(远端切缘[DM]、环周切缘[CRM]状态和中直肠系膜切除[TME]质量)和长期结果(总生存期[OS]和无病生存期[DFS])。平均手术时间为 275(±60.5)分钟。中转率为 6.6%。27 例(22.1%)发生并发症,2 例(1.5%)需要再次手术。中位随访时间为 30.5(5.9-86.1)个月。无 DM 阳性病例。CRM 阳性率为 2.5%(2 例),94.3%(115 例)达到完全 TME。复发率为 5.7%(2 例局部复发,4 例远处转移,1 例局部加远处肿瘤复发)。OS 和 DFS 分别为 90.7%和 83%。多因素分析显示,CRM 阳性和近完全/不完全 TME 是 OS 和 DFS 的不良预后因素。在适当的逻辑和手术条件下,机器人手术治疗直肠癌在肿瘤学上是有效的,具有足够的病理结果和长期结果。它还提供了可接受的围手术期结果,进一步证实了该技术的安全性和可行性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88cd/8184562/f7e7ab8f929b/13304_2020_911_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88cd/8184562/9ca3a09d67a6/13304_2020_911_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88cd/8184562/173fcbd91eb5/13304_2020_911_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88cd/8184562/f7e7ab8f929b/13304_2020_911_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88cd/8184562/9ca3a09d67a6/13304_2020_911_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88cd/8184562/173fcbd91eb5/13304_2020_911_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88cd/8184562/f7e7ab8f929b/13304_2020_911_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Robotic rectal resection: oncologic outcomes.机器人直肠切除术:肿瘤学结果。
Updates Surg. 2021 Jun;73(3):1081-1091. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00911-6. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
2
Single-Docking Full Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Single-Center Experience.直肠癌单对接全机器人手术:单中心经验
Surg Innov. 2018 Jun;25(3):258-266. doi: 10.1177/1553350618765868. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
3
An observational study of patho-oncological outcomes of various surgical methods in total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a single center analysis.直肠癌全直肠系膜切除术中不同手术方法的病理肿瘤学结局的观察性研究:单中心分析
BMC Surg. 2020 Feb 3;20(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-0687-1.
4
Total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: Laparoscopic vs robotic surgery.中低位直肠癌的全直肠系膜切除术:腹腔镜手术与机器人手术对比
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Apr 7;22(13):3602-10. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i13.3602.
5
The impact of robotic total mesorectal excision on survival of patients with rectal cancer-a propensity matched analysis.机器人全直肠系膜切除术对直肠癌患者生存的影响:倾向评分匹配分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019 Dec;34(12):2081-2089. doi: 10.1007/s00384-019-03417-9. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
6
The long-term oncological outcomes of the 140 robotic sphincter-saving total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a single surgeon experience.140例机器人保留括约肌全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的长期肿瘤学结局:单中心经验
J Robot Surg. 2020 Aug;14(4):655-661. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-01037-7. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
7
Long-term outcomes by a transanal approach to total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的长期疗效。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Dec;31(12):5248-5257. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5597-7. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
8
Comparison of short-term and oncologic outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic resection for mid- and distal rectal cancer.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗中低位直肠癌的短期及肿瘤学结局比较
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jul;31(7):2798-2807. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5289-8. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
9
Robotic versus laparoscopic sphincter-saving total mesorectal excision for mid or low rectal cancer in male patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: comparison of long-term outcomes.新辅助放化疗后男性中低位直肠癌患者机器人与腹腔镜保留括约肌全直肠系膜切除术:长期结果比较
J Robot Surg. 2020 Jun;14(3):393-399. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-01001-5. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
10
Robot Surgery Shows Similar Long-term Oncologic Outcomes as Laparoscopic Surgery for Mid/Lower Rectal Cancer but Is Beneficial to ypT3/4 After Preoperative Chemoradiation.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗中/低位直肠癌的长期肿瘤学结果相似,但对术前放化疗后的 ypT3/4 有益。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2021 Jul 1;64(7):812-821. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001978.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of superior hemorrhoidal vein ectasia in the preoperative staging of rectal cancer.直肠上静脉扩张在直肠癌术前分期中的作用。
Front Oncol. 2024 Aug 5;14:1356022. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1356022. eCollection 2024.
2
Long-Term Outcomes of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excisions: A Propensity-Score Matched Cohort study of 5-year survival outcomes.机器人手术与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术的长期结果:一项关于5年生存结果的倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Ann Surg Open. 2024 Mar 27;5(2):e404. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000404. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Comparative analysis of short-term outcomes and oncological results between robotic-assisted and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer by multiple surgeon implementation: a propensity score-matched analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Sphincter-Saving Surgery: Results of a Single-Center Series of 400 Consecutive Patients and Perspectives.机器人与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术在保肛手术中的比较:400 例连续患者的单中心系列研究结果及展望。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Nov;25(12):3572-3579. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6738-5. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
2
Single-Docking Full Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Single-Center Experience.直肠癌单对接全机器人手术:单中心经验
Surg Innov. 2018 Jun;25(3):258-266. doi: 10.1177/1553350618765868. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
3
Fluorescence angiography during transanal trans-stomal proctectomy and ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a video vignette.
多外科医生实施机器人辅助与腹腔镜手术治疗直肠癌的短期结局和肿瘤学结果的对比分析:倾向评分匹配分析。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Dec;17(6):3013-3023. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01736-2. Epub 2023 Nov 4.
经肛门经造口直肠切除术和回肠储袋肛管吻合术中的荧光血管造影:视频案例
Colorectal Dis. 2017 Dec 15. doi: 10.1111/codi.13992.
4
Effect of Robotic-Assisted vs Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery on Risk of Conversion to Open Laparotomy Among Patients Undergoing Resection for Rectal Cancer: The ROLARR Randomized Clinical Trial.机器人辅助手术与传统腹腔镜手术对直肠癌切除患者中转开腹风险的影响:ROLARR随机临床试验
JAMA. 2017 Oct 24;318(16):1569-1580. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7219.
5
Pathologic Outcomes of Laparoscopic vs Open Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开腹直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的病理结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Surg. 2017 Apr 19;152(4):e165665. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.5665.
6
Oncological Outcomes After Robotic Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer: Analysis of a Prospective Database.机器人直肠癌根治术后的肿瘤学结果:前瞻性数据库分析。
Ann Surg. 2018 Mar;267(3):521-526. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002112.
7
Learning curve in robotic rectal cancer surgery: current state of affairs.机器人直肠癌手术的学习曲线:现状
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Dec;31(12):1807-1815. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2660-0. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
8
Long-term oncological outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision of mid-low rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy.新辅助放化疗后机器人与腹腔镜中低位直肠癌全直肠系膜切除术的长期肿瘤学结局
Surg Endosc. 2017 Apr;31(4):1728-1737. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5165-6. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
9
Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer in a single surgeon's experience: a cost analysis covering the initial 50 robotic cases with the da Vinci Si.单名外科医生经验中机器人辅助与腹腔镜直肠癌切除术对比:一项涵盖达芬奇Si系统最初50例机器人手术病例的成本分析
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Sep;31(9):1639-48. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2631-5. Epub 2016 Jul 31.
10
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) for Sphincter-Saving Surgery: Is There Any Difference in the Transanal TME Rectal Approach? : A Single-Center Series of 120 Consecutive Patients.机器人手术与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术(TME)在保留括约肌手术中的应用:经肛门TME直肠入路有何差异?:单中心120例连续患者系列研究
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 May;23(5):1594-600. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-5048-4. Epub 2015 Dec 29.