• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳腺癌炎症参数预后价值的Meta分析。

Meta-analysis of prognostic value of inflammation parameter in breast cancer.

作者信息

Chen Jie, Pan Yuqin, He Bangshun, Ying Houqun, Sun Huiling, Deng Qiwen, Liu Xian, Wang Shukui

机构信息

Department of Life Sciences, Nanjing Normal University; Central Laboratory, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Central Laboratory, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

J Cancer Res Ther. 2018;14(Supplement):S85-S89. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.160917.

DOI:10.4103/0973-1482.160917
PMID:29578155
Abstract

CONTEXT

Recently, increasing studies investigated the association between inflammation parameter such as neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the prognosis of cancers. However, the clinical and prognostic significance of NLR in breast cancer remains controversial.

AIM

This meta-analysis was conducted to establish the overall accuracy of the NLR test in the diagnosis of breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive search of the literature was conducted using PubMed and Web of Science. Six studies dating up to July 2014 with 2267 patients were enrolled in the present study. STATA 11.0 software (STATA Corporation, College Station, TX, USA) was selected for data analysis. In order to evaluate the association between NLR and overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), recurrence-free survival or cancer-specific survival, the hazard ratios (HRs), and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted.

RESULTS

Subgroup analyses showed that NLR was a strong prognostic factor for OS in multivariate analysis (HR = 2.81, 95% CI = 2.13-3.71, P = 0.992) and without metastasis (HR = 1.45, 95% CI = 0.37-5.66, P < 0.001). Elevated NLR was associated with a high risk for DFS in subgroups of multivariate analysis (HR = 2.16, 95% CI = 1.67-2.80, P = 0.977) and mixed metastasis (HR = 2.13, 95% CI = 1.38-3.30, P = 0.84).

CONCLUSION

In summary, NLR may be considered as a predictive factor for patients with breast cancer.

摘要

背景

最近,越来越多的研究调查了诸如中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)等炎症参数与癌症预后之间的关联。然而,NLR在乳腺癌中的临床和预后意义仍存在争议。

目的

本荟萃分析旨在确定NLR检测在乳腺癌诊断中的总体准确性。

材料与方法

使用PubMed和Web of Science对文献进行全面检索。本研究纳入了截至2014年7月的6项研究,共2267例患者。选择STATA 11.0软件(美国德克萨斯州大学站市STATA公司)进行数据分析。为了评估NLR与总生存期(OS)、无病生存期(DFS)、无复发生存期或癌症特异性生存期之间的关联,提取了风险比(HR)及其95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

亚组分析显示,在多变量分析中,NLR是OS的一个强有力的预后因素(HR = 2.81,95%CI = 2.13 - 3.71,P = 0.992),且在无转移患者中也是如此(HR = 1.45,95%CI = 0.37 - 5.66,P < 0.001)。在多变量分析亚组(HR = 2.16,95%CI = 1.67 - 2.80,P = 0.977)和混合转移亚组(HR = 2.13,95%CI = 1.38 - 3.30,P = 0.84)中,NLR升高与DFS高风险相关。

结论

总之,NLR可被视为乳腺癌患者的一个预测因素。

相似文献

1
Meta-analysis of prognostic value of inflammation parameter in breast cancer.乳腺癌炎症参数预后价值的Meta分析。
J Cancer Res Ther. 2018;14(Supplement):S85-S89. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.160917.
2
Prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in breast cancer.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值在乳腺癌中的预后价值。
FEBS Open Bio. 2015 May 12;5:502-7. doi: 10.1016/j.fob.2015.05.003. eCollection 2015.
3
Prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio for breast cancer patients: An updated meta-analysis of 17079 individuals.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值和血小板与淋巴细胞比值对乳腺癌患者的预后价值:对 17079 个人的更新荟萃分析。
Cancer Med. 2019 Aug;8(9):4135-4148. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2281. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
4
Prognostic and Clinicopathologic Significance of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Esophageal Cancer: An Update Meta-Analysis.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值对食管癌预后及临床病理意义的更新荟萃分析
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Jan-Dec;21:15330338211070140. doi: 10.1177/15330338211070140.
5
Predictive and prognostic role of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes in breast cancer patients with different molecular subtypes: a meta-analysis.肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞在不同分子亚型乳腺癌患者中的预测和预后作用:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Nov 25;20(1):1150. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07654-y.
6
Prognostic value of the systemic immune-inflammation index in patients with breast cancer: a meta-analysis.全身免疫炎症指数在乳腺癌患者中的预后价值:一项荟萃分析
Cancer Cell Int. 2020 Jun 9;20:224. doi: 10.1186/s12935-020-01308-6. eCollection 2020.
7
Prognostic role of pretreatment neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in breast cancer patients: A meta-analysis.治疗前中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值在乳腺癌患者中的预后作用:一项荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Nov;96(45):e8101. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008101.
8
Prognostic significance of neutrophil-to- lymphocyte ratio in esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值在食管癌中的预后意义:一项荟萃分析
Onco Targets Ther. 2015 Apr 10;8:789-94. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S77099. eCollection 2015.
9
Prognostic value of pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.术前中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值对肾细胞癌的预后价值:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Urol. 2020 Jul 6;20(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00665-8.
10
Neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio and intraoperative use of ketorolac or diclofenac are prognostic factors in different cohorts of patients undergoing breast, lung, and kidney cancer surgery.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值及围术期使用酮咯酸或双氯芬酸是行乳腺癌、肺癌和肾癌手术的不同患者队列的预后因素。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Dec;20 Suppl 3:S650-60. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3136-x. Epub 2013 Jul 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of Systemic Inflammation Response Index (SIRI) Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR), Derived Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio (dNLR), and Systemic Immune Inflammation Index (SII) for predicting prognosis of acute diverticulitis.全身炎症反应指数(SIRI)、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、衍生中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(dNLR)及全身免疫炎症指数(SII)对急性憩室炎预后的预测效能
Updates Surg. 2025 May 15. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02241-x.
2
Plasma apolipoprotein M predicts overall survival in metastatic breast cancer patients.血浆载脂蛋白 M 可预测转移性乳腺癌患者的总生存期。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Oct;201(3):571-576. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-07045-4. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
3
Predictive evaluation of SIRI, SII, PNI, and GPS in cholecystostomy application in patients with acute cholecystitis.
预测 SIRI、SII、PNI 和 GPS 在急性胆囊炎患者胆囊造口术中的应用。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2022 Jul;28(7):940-946. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2022.90249.
4
Relationship between SIRI, SII values, and Alvarado score with complications of acute appendicitis during the COVID-19 pandemic.SIRI、SII 值与 Alvarado 评分与 COVID-19 大流行期间急性阑尾炎并发症的关系。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2022 Jun;28(6):751-755. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2021.94580.
5
Prognostic impact of peripheral blood neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in advanced-stage pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and its association with the immune-related tumour microenvironment.晚期肺大细胞神经内分泌癌外周血中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值的预后影响及其与免疫相关肿瘤微环境的关系。
Br J Cancer. 2021 Mar;124(5):925-932. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-01188-7. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
6
Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and cancer prognosis: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值与癌症预后:观察性研究系统评价和荟萃分析的伞状评价。
BMC Med. 2020 Nov 20;18(1):360. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01817-1.
7
Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score is a prognostic factor in patients with resected breast cancer.控制营养状况(CONUT)评分是可切除乳腺癌患者的预后因素。
Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 20;10(1):6633. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63610-7.
8
Pretreatment Systemic Inflammation Response Index in Patients with Breast Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy as a Useful Prognostic Indicator.新辅助化疗治疗的乳腺癌患者的预处理全身炎症反应指数作为一种有用的预后指标
Cancer Manag Res. 2020 Mar 3;12:1543-1567. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S235519. eCollection 2020.
9
Pre-treatment systemic immune-inflammation index is a useful prognostic indicator in patients with breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy.治疗前全身免疫炎症指数是接受新辅助化疗的乳腺癌患者的一种有用的预后指标。
J Cell Mol Med. 2020 Mar;24(5):2993-3021. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.14934. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
10
Pretreatment neutrophil/lymphocyte, platelet/lymphocyte, lymphocyte/monocyte, and neutrophil/monocyte ratios and outcome in elderly breast cancer patients.老年乳腺癌患者的治疗前中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞、血小板/淋巴细胞、淋巴细胞/单核细胞和中性粒细胞/单核细胞比值与预后的关系。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2019 Jul;21(7):855-863. doi: 10.1007/s12094-018-1999-9. Epub 2018 Nov 30.