Shockey Taylor M, Babik Kelsey R, Wurzelbacher Steven J, Moore Libby L, Bisesi Michael S
a Division of Surveillance, Hazard Evaluations, and Field Studies, National Institute for Occupational Health and Safety (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Cincinnati , Ohio.
b Division of Environmental Health Sciences, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University , Columbus , Ohio.
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2018 Jun;15(6):502-509. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2018.1453140.
Despite substantial financial and personnel resources being devoted to occupational exposure monitoring (OEM) by employers, workers' compensation insurers, and other organizations, the United States (U.S.) lacks comprehensive occupational exposure databases to use for research and surveillance activities. OEM data are necessary for determining the levels of workers' exposures; compliance with regulations; developing control measures; establishing worker exposure profiles; and improving preventive and responsive exposure surveillance and policy efforts. Workers' compensation insurers as a group may have particular potential for understanding exposures in various industries, especially among small employers. This is the first study to determine how selected state-based and private workers' compensation insurers collect, store, and use OEM data related specifically to air and noise sampling. Of 50 insurers contacted to participate in this study, 28 completed an online survey. All of the responding private and the majority of state-based insurers offered industrial hygiene (IH) services to policyholders and employed 1 to 3 certified industrial hygienists on average. Many, but not all, insurers used standardized forms for data collection, but the data were not commonly stored in centralized databases. Data were most often used to provide recommendations for improvement to policyholders. Although not representative of all insurers, the survey was completed by insurers that cover a substantial number of employers and workers. The 20 participating state-based insurers on average provided 48% of the workers' compensation insurance benefits in their respective states or provinces. These results provide insight into potential next steps for improving the access to and usability of existing data as well as ways researchers can help organizations improve data collection strategies. This effort represents an opportunity for collaboration among insurers, researchers, and others that can help insurers and employers while advancing the exposure assessment field in the U.S.
尽管雇主、工人赔偿保险公司及其他组织投入了大量资金和人力用于职业暴露监测(OEM),但美国仍缺乏用于研究和监测活动的全面职业暴露数据库。OEM数据对于确定工人的暴露水平、遵守法规、制定控制措施、建立工人暴露概况以及改进预防性和响应性暴露监测及政策措施而言必不可少。作为一个群体,工人赔偿保险公司在了解各行业暴露情况方面可能具有特殊潜力,尤其是在小雇主当中。这是第一项确定选定的州立和私人工人赔偿保险公司如何收集、存储和使用与空气及噪声采样具体相关的OEM数据的研究。在联系参与本研究的50家保险公司中,有28家完成了在线调查。所有回复的私人保险公司以及大多数州立保险公司都为投保人提供工业卫生(IH)服务,平均雇佣1至3名注册工业卫生学家。许多(但并非所有)保险公司使用标准化表格进行数据收集,但数据通常未存储在集中式数据库中。数据最常被用于为投保人提供改进建议。尽管该调查并不代表所有保险公司,但完成调查的保险公司覆盖了大量雇主和工人。参与调查的20家州立保险公司平均在各自的州或省份提供了48%的工人赔偿保险福利。这些结果为改进现有数据的获取和可用性的潜在后续步骤以及研究人员可帮助各组织改进数据收集策略的方式提供了见解。这项工作为保险公司、研究人员及其他各方之间的合作提供了一个机会,既能帮助保险公司和雇主,又能推动美国的暴露评估领域发展。