Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
J Am Coll Surg. 2018 Jul;227(1):38-43.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.02.016. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
The 2013 Tokyo Guidelines (TG13) are used to diagnose, grade severity, and guide management of acute cholecystitis (AC). The aim of our study was to verify the diagnostic criteria, severity assessment, and management protocols based on the TG13.
Our prospectively maintained emergency general surgery registry was used to review patients who had a surgical consultation for right upper quadrant pain (from 2013 to 2015). Diagnosis and severity were graded based on TG13 and compared with pathology reports. Our institutional management protocols were compared with TG13.
Nine hundred and fifty-two patients were analyzed, of which 857 had biliary diseases. Mean age was 42 ± 18 years and 67% were female. Seven hundred and seventy-nine had a cholecystectomy, 15 underwent cholecystostomy tube placement, and 63 patients were managed conservatively. Only 4% were febrile on presentation and 51% of patients had leukocytosis. Fifty-nine percent of patients did not have any signs of AC on ultrasonography. The TG13 criteria had a sensitivity of 53% for diagnosing AC (definitive 27%, suspected 26%, and undiagnosed 47%) when compared with the final pathology report; 92.5% of patients with grade I, 93% with grade II, and even 64% with grade III, underwent cholecystectomy safely at our institute. There were no differences in complication rates (3.7% vs 4.7%; p = 0.81), return to operating room rates (0.6% vs 0.7%; p = 0.95), or mortality rates (0.3% vs 0%; p = 0.96) between grade I and grade II patients who underwent early cholecystectomy.
The TG13 diagnostic criteria lack sensitivity and missed more than half of the patients with AC, as many patients lack clinical signs (fever and leukocytosis). The TG13 recommendations for conservative management and delayed cholecystectomy in grade II and grade III disease are not warranted.
2013 年东京指南(TG13)用于诊断、分级严重程度并指导急性胆囊炎(AC)的治疗。我们的研究目的是验证基于 TG13 的诊断标准、严重程度评估和治疗方案。
我们使用前瞻性维护的急诊普通外科登记处,回顾了因右上腹疼痛而接受外科会诊的患者(2013 年至 2015 年)。根据 TG13 对诊断和严重程度进行分级,并与病理报告进行比较。将我们的机构管理方案与 TG13 进行比较。
分析了 952 例患者,其中 857 例患有胆道疾病。平均年龄为 42 ± 18 岁,67%为女性。779 例行胆囊切除术,15 例行胆囊造口术,63 例患者接受保守治疗。仅 4%的患者在就诊时发热,51%的患者白细胞增多。59%的患者在超声检查中没有任何 AC 征象。与最终病理报告相比,TG13 标准诊断 AC 的敏感性为 53%(明确诊断 27%,疑似诊断 26%,未诊断 47%);92.5%的 I 级患者、93%的 II 级患者,甚至 64%的 III 级患者在我院安全行胆囊切除术。I 级和 II 级患者早期行胆囊切除术的并发症发生率(3.7%比 4.7%;p=0.81)、再次手术率(0.6%比 0.7%;p=0.95)和死亡率(0.3%比 0%;p=0.96)无差异。
TG13 诊断标准缺乏敏感性,漏诊了一半以上的 AC 患者,因为许多患者缺乏临床症状(发热和白细胞增多)。在 II 级和 III 级疾病中,TG13 推荐的保守治疗和延迟胆囊切除术是不合理的。