• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性胆囊炎管理的进展

Advances in the management of acute cholecystitis.

作者信息

Mou Danny, Tesfasilassie Tomas, Hirji Sameer, Ashley Stanley W

机构信息

Harvard Medical School CRICO Scholar in Quality and Safety Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston Massachusetts.

Department of Surgery Harvard Medical School Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston Massachusetts.

出版信息

Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2019 Feb 19;3(3):247-253. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12240. eCollection 2019 May.

DOI:10.1002/ags3.12240
PMID:31131353
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6524093/
Abstract

The diagnosis and management of acute cholecystitis (AC) continues to evolve. Among the most common surgically treated conditions in the USA, appropriate diagnosis and management of AC require astute clinical judgment and operative skill. Useful diagnostic and grading systems have been developed, most notably the Tokyo guidelines, but some recent clinical validation studies have questioned their generalizability to the US population. The timing of surgical intervention is another area that requires further investigation. US surgeons traditionally pursue laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for AC patients with symptoms onset <72 hours, but for patients with symptoms over 72 hours, surgeons often elect to treat the patients with antibiotics and delay LC for 4-6 weeks to permit the inflammation to subside. This practice has recently been called into question, as there are data suggesting that LC even for AC patients with over 72 hours of symptoms confers decreased morbidity, shorter length of stay, and reduced overall healthcare costs. Finally, the role of percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) needs to be better defined. Traditional role of PC is a temporizing measure for patients who are poor surgical candidates. However, there are data suggesting that in AC patients with organ failure, PC patients suffered higher mortality and readmission rates when compared with a propensity-matched LC cohort. Beyond diagnosis, the surgical management of AC can be remarkably challenging. All surgeons need to be familiar with best-practice surgical techniques, adjunct intra-operative imaging, and bail-out options when performing LC.

摘要

急性胆囊炎(AC)的诊断和管理仍在不断发展。在美国最常见的外科治疗疾病中,AC的恰当诊断和管理需要敏锐的临床判断力和手术技巧。有用的诊断和分级系统已经制定出来,最著名的是东京指南,但最近的一些临床验证研究对其在美国人群中的通用性提出了质疑。手术干预的时机是另一个需要进一步研究的领域。美国外科医生传统上对症状出现<72小时的AC患者采用腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC),但对于症状超过72小时的患者,外科医生通常选择用抗生素治疗并将LC推迟4 - 6周,以使炎症消退。这种做法最近受到了质疑,因为有数据表明,即使对于症状超过72小时的AC患者,LC也能降低发病率、缩短住院时间并降低总体医疗成本。最后,经皮胆囊造瘘术(PC)的作用需要更明确地界定。PC的传统作用是作为手术条件较差患者的一种临时措施。然而,有数据表明,在伴有器官衰竭的AC患者中,与倾向匹配的LC队列相比,PC患者的死亡率和再入院率更高。除了诊断之外,AC的手术管理可能极具挑战性。所有外科医生在进行LC时都需要熟悉最佳实践手术技术、术中辅助成像以及补救措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74f1/6524093/9beba3405575/AGS3-3-247-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74f1/6524093/9beba3405575/AGS3-3-247-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74f1/6524093/9beba3405575/AGS3-3-247-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Advances in the management of acute cholecystitis.急性胆囊炎管理的进展
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2019 Feb 19;3(3):247-253. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12240. eCollection 2019 May.
2
Impact of percutaneous cholecystostomy in the management of acute cholecystitis: a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary center.经皮胆囊造口术在急性胆囊炎治疗中的影响:一家三级中心的回顾性队列研究。
Updates Surg. 2023 Jun;75(4):905-914. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01499-3. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
3
Tokyo Guidelines 2013 may be too restrictive and patients with moderate and severe acute cholecystitis can be managed by early cholecystectomy too.《2013东京指南》可能限制过多,中度和重度急性胆囊炎患者也可通过早期胆囊切除术进行治疗。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jul;31(7):2892-2900. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5300-4. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
4
Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in aged acute calculous cholecystitis: a cohort study.老年急性结石性胆囊炎行腹腔镜胆囊切除术与延期腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较:一项队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jul;34(7):2994-3001. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07091-4. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
5
Percutaneous Cholecystostomy in Severe Acute Cholecystitis: An Observational Study From a Single Institute.重症急性胆囊炎的经皮胆囊造瘘术:来自单一机构的观察性研究
Cureus. 2023 Feb 2;15(2):e34539. doi: 10.7759/cureus.34539. eCollection 2023 Feb.
6
Timing of cholecystectomy following cholecystostomy tube placement for acute cholecystitis: a retrospective study aiming to identify the optimal timing between a percutaneous cholecystostomy and cholecystectomy to reduce the number of poor surgical outcomes.经皮胆囊造瘘术后行胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的时机:一项旨在确定经皮胆囊造瘘术与胆囊切除术之间最佳时机以减少不良手术结局数量的回顾性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Oct;36(10):7541-7548. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09193-y. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
7
Percutaneous cholecystostomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis and failed conservative management: a matched-pair analysis.急性胆囊炎且保守治疗失败患者中行经皮胆囊造瘘术与腹腔镜胆囊切除术的配对分析
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2014 Dec;24(6):523-7. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31829015d2.
8
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Percutaneous Cholecystostomy: Suitability of APACHE-II Score, ASA Grade, and Tokyo Guidelines 18 Grade as Predictors of Outcome in Patients With Acute Cholecystitis.腹腔镜胆囊切除术与经皮胆囊造口术:APACHE-II 评分、ASA 分级和东京指南 18 分级作为急性胆囊炎患者结局预测因子的适用性。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2022 Jun 1;32(3):342-349. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001048.
9
Percutaneous cholecystostomy for delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis: analysis of a single-centre experience and literature review.经皮胆囊造瘘术用于急性胆囊炎患者延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术:单中心经验分析及文献综述
Prz Gastroenterol. 2017;12(4):250-255. doi: 10.5114/pg.2017.72098. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
10
A propensity score matched comparison of readmissions and cost of laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis.经腹腔镜胆囊切除术与经皮胆囊造口术治疗急性胆囊炎的再入院率和成本的倾向评分匹配比较。
Am J Surg. 2019 Jan;217(1):83-89. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.10.047. Epub 2018 Nov 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Concurrent Acute Appendicitis and Cholecystitis: A Systematic Literature Review.并发急性阑尾炎和胆囊炎:一项系统文献综述
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 15;14(14):5019. doi: 10.3390/jcm14145019.
2
Development and validation of a radiologically-based nomogram for preoperative prediction of difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy.基于放射学的列线图用于术前预测困难腹腔镜胆囊切除术的开发与验证
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Apr 22;12:1561769. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1561769. eCollection 2025.
3
Letter to the Editor RE: "A bifid gallbladder? A challenging laparoscopic cholecystectomy".

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute cholecystitis in high risk patients (CHOCOLATE): multicentre randomised clinical trial.腹腔镜胆囊切除术与经皮胆囊穿刺引流术治疗高危患者急性胆囊炎(CHOCOLATE):多中心随机临床试验。
BMJ. 2018 Oct 8;363:k3965. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k3965.
2
Evaluating the Relevance of the 2013 Tokyo Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Cholecystitis.评估 2013 年东京指南在胆囊炎的诊断和管理中的相关性。
J Am Coll Surg. 2018 Jul;227(1):38-43.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.02.016. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
3
[Emergency cholecystectomy versus percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage followed by delayed cholecystectomy in patients with moderate acute cholecystitis].
致编辑的信 主题:“双叶胆囊?一例具有挑战性的腹腔镜胆囊切除术”
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2024 Jul;120:109900. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.109900. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
4
The Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Cholecystitis: A Comprehensive Narrative Review for a Practical Approach.急性胆囊炎的诊断与治疗:实用方法的全面叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2024 May 3;13(9):2695. doi: 10.3390/jcm13092695.
5
Epidemiology and Outcomes of Symptomatic Cholelithiasis and Cholecystitis in the USA: Trends and Urban-Rural Variations.美国有症状胆结石和胆囊炎的流行病学及转归:趋势与城乡差异
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 May;27(5):932-944. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05604-0. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
6
The utility of the CADISS® system in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.CADISS® 系统在急性胆囊炎腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的应用。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Dec;36(12):9462-9468. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09616-w. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
7
Effect of timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on postoperative efficacy and rehabilitation of elderly patients with acute cholecystitis.腹腔镜胆囊切除术时机对老年急性胆囊炎患者术后疗效及康复的影响
Am J Transl Res. 2022 Feb 15;14(2):1107-1113. eCollection 2022.
8
CT findings and outcomes of acute cholecystitis: is additional ultrasound necessary?急性胆囊炎的CT表现及预后:是否需要额外进行超声检查?
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Nov;46(11):5434-5442. doi: 10.1007/s00261-021-03160-2. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
9
Clinical and therapeutic features of acute cholecystitis in diabetic patients.糖尿病患者急性胆囊炎的临床及治疗特点
Exp Ther Med. 2021 Jul;22(1):758. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.10190. Epub 2021 May 13.
10
Aggressive Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Accordance with the Tokyo Guideline 2018.根据 2018 年东京指南行积极腹腔镜胆囊切除术。
JSLS. 2021 Jan-Mar;25(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2020.00116.
[中度急性胆囊炎患者行急诊胆囊切除术与经皮经肝胆管胆囊引流术继以延期胆囊切除术的比较]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2018 Mar 13;98(10):768-772. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2018.10.011.
4
Near-infrared fluorescent cholangiography - real-time visualization of the biliary tree during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.近红外荧光胆管造影术——择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术期间胆管树的实时可视化
HPB (Oxford). 2018 Jun;20(6):538-545. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.11.013. Epub 2017 Dec 29.
5
Risk factors for difficulty of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in grade II acute cholecystitis according to the Tokyo guidelines 2013.根据《2013东京指南》探讨Ⅱ级急性胆囊炎患者行腹腔镜胆囊切除术困难的危险因素。
BMC Surg. 2017 Nov 28;17(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12893-017-0319-6.
6
Tokyo Guidelines 2018: flowchart for the management of acute cholecystitis.东京指南 2018:急性胆囊炎管理流程图。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018 Jan;25(1):55-72. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.516. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
7
Tokyo Guidelines 2018: diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis (with videos).东京指南 2018:急性胆囊炎的诊断标准与严重程度分级(附视频)。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018 Jan;25(1):41-54. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.515. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
8
Outcomes in Older Patients with Grade III Cholecystitis and Cholecystostomy Tube Placement: A Propensity Score Analysis.老年Ⅲ级胆囊炎患者行胆囊造瘘管置入术的结局:一项倾向评分分析
J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Apr;224(4):502-511.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.12.021. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
9
Early Versus Delayed Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis, Are the 72 hours Still the Rule?: A Randomized Trial.早期与延迟胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎:72 小时仍然是金标准吗?:一项随机试验。
Ann Surg. 2016 Nov;264(5):717-722. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001886.
10
Risk-adjusted treatment selection and outcome of patients with acute cholecystitis.急性胆囊炎患者的风险调整治疗选择与预后
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017 Jun;402(4):607-614. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1508-y. Epub 2016 Oct 4.