• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用基于片段的计算方法可靠地预测人类皮肤致敏性。

Making reliable negative predictions of human skin sensitisation using an in silico fragmentation approach.

机构信息

Lhasa Limited, Granary Wharf House, 2 Canal Wharf, Leeds, LS11 5PS, UK.

Lhasa Limited, Granary Wharf House, 2 Canal Wharf, Leeds, LS11 5PS, UK.

出版信息

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2018 Jun;95:227-235. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.03.015. Epub 2018 Mar 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.03.015
PMID:29580972
Abstract

A previously published fragmentation method for making reliable negative in silico predictions has been applied to the problem of predicting skin sensitisation in humans, making use of a dataset of over 2750 chemicals with publicly available skin sensitisation data from 18 in vivo assays. An assay hierarchy was designed to enable the classification of chemicals within this dataset as either sensitisers or non-sensitisers where data from more than one in vivo test was available. The negative prediction approach was validated internally, using a 5-fold cross-validation, and externally, against a proprietary dataset of approximately 1000 chemicals with in vivo reference data shared by members of the pharmaceutical, nutritional, and personal care industries. The negative predictivity for this proprietary dataset was high in all cases (>75%), and the model was also able to identify structural features that resulted in a lower accuracy or a higher uncertainty in the negative prediction, termed misclassified and unclassified features respectively. These features could serve as an aid for further expert assessment of the negative in silico prediction.

摘要

先前发表的一种用于进行可靠的计算机虚拟阴性预测的片段化方法已应用于预测人类皮肤致敏的问题,该方法利用了一个包含超过 2750 种化学物质的数据集,这些化学物质具有来自 18 种体内试验的公开可用的皮肤致敏数据。设计了一个试验层次结构,以便能够对该数据集中的化学物质进行分类,分为致敏剂或非致敏剂,只要有多个体内试验的数据可用。使用 5 倍交叉验证对内进行了阴性预测方法的验证,并针对制药、营养和个人护理行业成员共享的体内参考数据的大约 1000 种化学物质的专有数据集进行了外部验证。在所有情况下,该专有数据集的阴性预测率都很高(>75%),并且该模型还能够识别导致阴性预测准确性降低或不确定性增加的结构特征,分别称为错误分类和未分类特征。这些特征可以作为进一步对计算机虚拟阴性预测进行专家评估的辅助。

相似文献

1
Making reliable negative predictions of human skin sensitisation using an in silico fragmentation approach.利用基于片段的计算方法可靠地预测人类皮肤致敏性。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2018 Jun;95:227-235. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.03.015. Epub 2018 Mar 24.
2
A defined approach for predicting skin sensitisation hazard and potency based on the guided integration of in silico, in chemico and in vitro data using exclusion criteria.一种基于使用排除标准对计算机模拟、化学实验和体外数据进行引导整合来预测皮肤致敏危害和效力的明确方法。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2019 Feb;101:35-47. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.11.001. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
3
Updating the Dermal Sensitisation Thresholds using an expanded dataset and an in silico expert system.使用扩展数据集和基于计算机的专家系统更新皮肤致敏阈值。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2022 Aug;133:105200. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2022.105200. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
4
Predicting skin sensitisation using a decision tree integrated testing strategy with an in silico model and in chemico/in vitro assays.使用结合计算机模拟模型与化学/体外试验的决策树综合测试策略预测皮肤致敏性。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2016 Apr;76:30-8. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2016.01.009. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
5
Consensus of classification trees for skin sensitisation hazard prediction.用于皮肤致敏危害预测的分类树共识
Toxicol In Vitro. 2016 Oct;36:197-209. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2016.07.014. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
6
An evaluation of selected (Q)SARs/expert systems for predicting skin sensitisation potential.评价用于预测皮肤致敏潜力的选定(QSARs)/专家系统。
SAR QSAR Environ Res. 2018 Jun;29(6):439-468. doi: 10.1080/1062936X.2018.1455223. Epub 2018 Apr 20.
7
Extension of the Dermal Sensitisation Threshold (DST) approach to incorporate chemicals classified as reactive.扩展皮肤致敏阈值(DST)方法以纳入被归类为具有反应性的化学品。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015 Aug;72(3):694-701. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.04.020. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
8
Improvements to in silico skin sensitisation predictions through privacy-preserving data sharing.通过隐私保护数据共享改进计算机模拟皮肤致敏预测。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2023 Jan;137:105292. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2022.105292. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
9
Principles for identification of High Potency Category Chemicals for which the Dermal Sensitisation Threshold (DST) approach should not be applied.不应采用皮肤致敏阈值(DST)方法的高效能类别化学品的识别原则。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015 Aug;72(3):683-93. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.03.001. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
10
Classification of chemicals as sensitisers based on new test methods.基于新测试方法的化学物质致敏原分类
Toxicol Lett. 1992 Dec;64-65 Spec No:165-71. doi: 10.1016/0378-4274(92)90186-n.

引用本文的文献

1
The skin allergy risk assessment-integrated chemical environment (SARA-ICE) defined approach to derive points of departure for skin sensitization.用于推导皮肤致敏起始点的皮肤过敏风险评估综合化学环境(SARA-ICE)定义方法。
Curr Res Toxicol. 2024 Dec 14;8:100205. doi: 10.1016/j.crtox.2024.100205. eCollection 2025.
2
Matrine and Oxymatrine: evaluating the gene mutation potential using in silico tools and the bacterial reverse mutation assay (Ames test).苦参碱和氧化苦参碱:利用计算机工具和细菌回复突变试验(Ames 试验)评估基因突变潜力。
Mutagenesis. 2024 Feb 8;39(1):32-42. doi: 10.1093/mutage/gead032.
3
Standardisation and international adoption of defined approaches for skin sensitisation.
皮肤致敏定义方法的标准化及国际采用
Front Toxicol. 2022 Aug 11;4:943152. doi: 10.3389/ftox.2022.943152. eCollection 2022.
4
An Evaluation of the Occupational Health Hazards of Peptide Couplers.肽偶联剂的职业健康危害评估。
Chem Res Toxicol. 2022 Jun 20;35(6):1011-1022. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.2c00031. Epub 2022 May 9.
5
Use of Lhasa Limited Products for the In Silico Prediction of Drug Toxicity.利用拉萨有限产品进行药物毒性的计算机预测。
Methods Mol Biol. 2022;2425:435-478. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1960-5_17.
6
Prediction of Skin Sensitization: ?皮肤致敏预测:?
Front Pharmacol. 2021 May 4;12:655771. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.655771. eCollection 2021.
7
Skin Doctor: Machine Learning Models for Skin Sensitization Prediction that Provide Estimates and Indicators of Prediction Reliability.皮肤医生:用于皮肤致敏预测的机器学习模型,提供预测可靠性的估计和指标。
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Sep 28;20(19):4833. doi: 10.3390/ijms20194833.