Suppr超能文献

醋酸艾司利卡西平辅助治疗期间报告为不良事件的癫痫发作加重和癫痫发作发生率:三项III期对照试验的汇总分析。

Incidence of seizure exacerbation and seizures reported as adverse events during adjunctive treatment with eslicarbazepine acetate: A pooled analysis of three Phase III controlled trials.

作者信息

Carreño Mar, Benbadis Selim, Rocha Francisco, Blum David, Cheng Hailong

机构信息

Epilepsy Unit Hospital Clinic Barcelona Spain.

Department of Neurology University of South Florida Tampa Florida U.S.A.

出版信息

Epilepsia Open. 2017 Nov 9;2(4):459-466. doi: 10.1002/epi4.12083. eCollection 2017 Dec.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether adjunctive eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) could lead to exacerbation of seizures in some patients.

METHODS

Post-hoc analysis of data pooled from three Phase III trials of adjunctive ESL (studies 301, 302, and 304) for refractory partial-onset seizures (POS). Following an 8-week baseline period, patients were randomized to receive placebo or ESL 400, 800, or 1,200 mg once daily (2-week titration, 12-week maintenance, 2-4 week tapering-off periods). Patient seizure diary data and seizure treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) reports were pooled for analysis.

RESULTS

The modified intent-to-treat and safety populations comprised 1,410 patients and 1,447 patients, respectively. : Compared with placebo (32/21%), significantly smaller proportions of patients taking ESL 800 mg (20/15%) and 1,200 mg (22/12%) had a ≥25/≥50% increase in standardized seizure frequency (SSF) from baseline; there was no significant difference between placebo and ESL 400 mg. : Compared with placebo (20%), significantly smaller proportions of patients taking ESL (400 mg, 12%; 800 mg, 12%; 1,200 mg, 14%) had an increase in SSF ≥25%. When evaluating ≥50% increases in SSF, only ESL 800 mg (7%) was significantly different from placebo (12%). Some patients had no secondarily generalized tonic-clonic (sGTC) seizures during baseline but had ≥1 sGTC seizure during maintenance treatment (placebo, 11%; ESL 400 mg, 5%; 800 mg, 10%; 1,200 mg, 5%). Fewer patients had a ≥25% increase in sGTC seizure frequency with ESL (400 mg, 11%; 800 mg, 9%; 1,200 mg, 14%) versus placebo (19%). The incidence of seizures reported as TEAEs was low in all treatment groups; incidences were generally lower with ESL versus placebo. : Similar proportions of patients taking ESL and placebo had a ≥25/≥50% increase in SSF. Seizure TEAE incidence was numerically higher with ESL versus placebo.

SIGNIFICANCE

Treatment with adjunctive ESL does not appear to aggravate POS or sGTC seizures.

摘要

目的

研究加用醋酸艾司利卡西平(ESL)是否会导致部分患者癫痫发作加剧。

方法

对三项ESL辅助治疗(研究301、302和304)难治性局灶性发作(POS)的III期试验汇总数据进行事后分析。在8周的基线期后,患者被随机分配接受安慰剂或每日一次400、800或1200mg的ESL(2周滴定期、12周维持期、2 - 4周减量期)。汇总患者癫痫发作日记数据和癫痫治疗中出现的不良事件(TEAE)报告进行分析。

结果

改良意向性治疗人群和安全性人群分别包括1410例患者和1447例患者。:与安慰剂组(32/21%)相比,服用800mg ESL(20/15%)和1200mg ESL(22/12%)的患者中,标准化癫痫发作频率(SSF)较基线增加≥25/≥50%的比例显著更小;安慰剂组和400mg ESL组之间无显著差异。:与安慰剂组(20%)相比,服用ESL(400mg,12%;800mg,12%;1200mg,14%)的患者中,SSF增加≥25%的比例显著更小。在评估SSF增加≥50%时,只有800mg ESL组(7%)与安慰剂组(12%)有显著差异。一些患者在基线期无继发性全面强直 - 阵挛(sGTC)发作,但在维持治疗期间出现≥1次sGTC发作(安慰剂组,11%;400mg ESL组,5%;800mg ESL组,10%;1200mg ESL组,5%)。服用ESL(400mg,11%;800mg,9%;1200mg,14%)的患者中,sGTC发作频率增加≥25%的人数少于安慰剂组(19%)。所有治疗组中报告为TEAE的癫痫发作发生率较低;ESL组的发生率总体低于安慰剂组。:服用ESL和安慰剂的患者中,SSF增加≥25/≥50%的比例相似。ESL组癫痫TEAE发生率在数值上高于安慰剂组。

意义

ESL辅助治疗似乎不会加重POS或sGTC发作。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30e7/5862126/de7b1aa88b23/EPI4-2-459-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验