Livingston George, Hack Lindsey, Steinmann Kimberly P, Grafton-Cardwell Elizabeth E, Rosenheim Jay A
Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA.
California Department of Pesticide Regulation, Sacramento, CA.
J Econ Entomol. 2018 May 28;111(3):1290-1297. doi: 10.1093/jee/toy067.
Experimental approaches to studying the consequences of pesticide use, including impacts on beneficial insects, are vital; however, they can be limited in scale and realism. We show that an ecoinformatics approach that leverages existing data on pesticides, pests, and beneficials across multiple fields can provide complementary insights. We do this using a multi-year dataset (2002-2013) on pesticide applications and density estimates of two pests, citrus thrips (Scirtothrips citri (Moulton [Thysanoptera: Thripidae])) and citrus red mites (Panonychus citri McGregor [Acari: Tetranychidae]), and a natural enemy (Euseius spp. predatory mites) collected from citrus groves in the San Joaquin Valley of California. Using correlative analyses, we investigated the long-term consequences of pesticide use on S. citri and P. citri population densities to evaluate the hypothesis that the pest status of these species is largely due to the disruption of natural biological control-i.e., these are induced pests. We also evaluated short-term pesticide efficacy (suppression of citrus thrips and citrus red mite populations immediately post-application) and asked if it was correlated with the suppression of Euseius predator populations. Although the short-term efficacy of different pesticides varied significantly, our dataset does not suggest that the use of citrus pesticides suppressed Euseius densities or worsened pest problems. We also find that there is no general trade-off between pesticide efficacy and pesticide risk to Eusieus, such that highly effective and minimally disruptive compounds were available to citrus growers during the studied time period.
研究农药使用后果(包括对益虫的影响)的实验方法至关重要;然而,这些方法在规模和现实性方面可能存在局限性。我们表明,一种利用多个领域现有农药、害虫和益虫数据的生态信息学方法可以提供补充性见解。我们利用一个多年数据集(2002 - 2013年)来做到这一点,该数据集包含加利福尼亚州圣华金谷柑橘园的农药施用情况、两种害虫(柑橘蓟马(Scirtothrips citri (Moulton [缨翅目:蓟马科]))和柑橘红蜘蛛(Panonychus citri McGregor [蜱螨目:叶螨科]))的密度估计以及一种天敌(胡瓜钝绥螨属捕食螨)的数据。通过相关性分析,我们研究了农药使用对柑橘蓟马和柑橘红蜘蛛种群密度的长期影响,以评估以下假设:这些物种的害虫地位很大程度上是由于自然生物控制的破坏,即它们是诱发害虫。我们还评估了短期农药效果(施用后立即对柑橘蓟马和柑橘红蜘蛛种群的抑制作用),并询问其是否与胡瓜钝绥螨捕食者种群的抑制作用相关。尽管不同农药的短期效果差异显著,但我们的数据集并未表明柑橘农药的使用抑制了胡瓜钝绥螨的密度或加剧了害虫问题。我们还发现,在农药效果和对胡瓜钝绥螨的农药风险之间不存在普遍的权衡,即在研究期间,柑橘种植者可以获得高效且干扰最小的化合物。