Tan Poh Lin, Morgan S Philip, Zagheni Emilio
Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore, 469C Bukit Timah Road, Singapore 259772, P: +(65)6601-5228.
Department of Sociology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 155 Hamilton Hall CB 2310, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, P: (919)966-1710.
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2016 Jun;35(3):327-350. doi: 10.1007/s11113-016-9390-4. Epub 2016 Apr 2.
Household spending on children's pre-tertiary education is exceptionally high in Japan and South Korea, and has been cited as a cause of low fertility. Previous research attributes this high spending to a cultural emphasis on education in East Asian countries. In this paper, we argue that institutional factors, namely higher education and labor market systems, play an important role in reinforcing the pressure on parents to invest in their children's education. We review evidence showing that graduating from a prestigious university has very high economic and social returns in Japan and South Korea, and examine the implications for fertility within the framework of quantity-quality models. Finally, we put forward 'reverse one-child' policies that directly address the unintended consequences of these institutional factors on fertility. These policies have the additional virtues of having very low fiscal requirements and reducing social inequality.
在日本和韩国,家庭在子女高等教育前阶段的支出异常高昂,这被视为导致生育率低下的一个原因。先前的研究将这种高支出归因于东亚国家对教育的文化重视。在本文中,我们认为制度因素,即高等教育和劳动力市场体系,在加剧父母对子女教育投资的压力方面发挥着重要作用。我们回顾了相关证据,这些证据表明在日本和韩国,毕业于名牌大学有着非常高的经济和社会回报,并在数量—质量模型的框架内研究了其对生育率的影响。最后,我们提出了“反向独生子女”政策,该政策直接应对这些制度因素对生育率产生的意外后果。这些政策还有财政需求极低和减少社会不平等的额外优点。