Chun Sejong, Ryu Mi Ra, Cha Seung-Yeon, Seo Ji-Young, Cho Duck
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Samsung Biomedical Research Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Transfus Med Hemother. 2018 Jan;45(1):5-10. doi: 10.1159/000475506. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
The -AB phenotype, although rare, is the relatively most frequent of ABO subgroups in Koreans. To prevent ABO mistyping of -AB samples, our hospital has applied a combination of the manual tile method with automated devices. Herein, we report cases of ABO mistyping detected by the combination testing system.
Cases that showed discrepant results by automated devices and the manual tile method were evaluated. These samples were also tested by the standard tube method. The automated devices used in this study were a QWALYS-3 and Galileo NEO. Exons 6 and 7 of the gene were sequenced.
13 cases that had the -AB allele showed results suggestive of the -AB subgroup by manual methods, but were interpreted as AB by either automated device. This happened in 87.5% of these cases by QWALYS-3 and 70.0% by Galileo NEO. Genotyping results showed that 12 cases were or , and one case was
-AB samples were mistyped as AB by the automated microplate technique in some cases. We suggest that the manual tile method can be a simple supplemental test for the detection of the -AB phenotype, especially in countries with relatively high AB prevalence.
-AB血型表型虽罕见,但在韩国人中是ABO亚群中相对最常见的。为防止对 -AB样本进行ABO血型误判,我院采用了手工玻片法与自动化设备相结合的方法。在此,我们报告通过联合检测系统检测到的ABO血型误判病例。
对自动化设备和手工玻片法检测结果不一致的病例进行评估。这些样本也采用标准试管法进行检测。本研究中使用的自动化设备为QWALYS - 3和伽利略NEO。对该基因的第6和第7外显子进行测序。
13例携带 -AB等位基因的病例,手工方法检测结果提示为 -AB亚群,但在两种自动化设备检测中均被判定为AB型。QWALYS - 3检测出现这种情况的病例占87.5%,伽利略NEO检测出现这种情况的病例占70.0%。基因分型结果显示,12例为 或 ,1例为
在某些情况下,自动化微孔板技术会将 -AB样本误判为AB型。我们建议,手工玻片法可作为检测 -AB表型的一种简单补充检测方法,尤其是在AB血型患病率相对较高的国家。