• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于筛状前列腺癌。

On cribriform prostate cancer.

作者信息

Kweldam Charlotte F, van der Kwast Theodorus, van Leenders Geert J

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Transl Androl Urol. 2018 Feb;7(1):145-154. doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.12.33.

DOI:10.21037/tau.2017.12.33
PMID:29594028
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5861292/
Abstract

The management of newly diagnosed prostate cancer is challenging because of its heterogeneity in histology, genetics and clinical outcome. The clinical outcome of patients with Gleason score 7 prostate cancer varies greatly. Improving risk assessment in this group is of particular interest, as Gleason score 7 prostate cancer on biopsy is an important clinical threshold for active treatment. Architecturally, four Gleason grade 4 growth patterns are recognized: ill-formed, fused, glomeruloid and cribriform. The aim of this review is to describe the role of cribriform growth in prostate cancer with respect to diagnosis, prognosis and molecular pathology. Secondly, we will discuss clinical applications for cribriform prostate cancer and give recommendations for future research.

摘要

新诊断前列腺癌的管理具有挑战性,因为其在组织学、遗传学和临床结果方面存在异质性。 Gleason评分7分的前列腺癌患者的临床结果差异很大。 由于活检时Gleason评分7分的前列腺癌是积极治疗的重要临床阈值,因此改善该组患者的风险评估尤为重要。 在结构上,公认有四种Gleason 4级生长模式:形态不良、融合、肾小球样和筛状。 本综述的目的是描述筛状生长在前列腺癌的诊断、预后和分子病理学方面的作用。 其次,我们将讨论筛状前列腺癌的临床应用,并为未来研究提出建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5855/5861292/61070d373b7b/tau-07-01-145-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5855/5861292/61070d373b7b/tau-07-01-145-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5855/5861292/61070d373b7b/tau-07-01-145-f1.jpg

相似文献

1
On cribriform prostate cancer.关于筛状前列腺癌。
Transl Androl Urol. 2018 Feb;7(1):145-154. doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.12.33.
2
Prostate cancer grading in 2018: limitations, implementations, cribriform morphology, and biological markers.2018年前列腺癌分级:局限性、实施情况、筛状形态及生物标志物
Int J Biol Markers. 2018 Nov;33(4):331-334. doi: 10.1177/1724600818781296. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
3
Prostate cancer with cribriform morphology: diagnosis, aggressiveness, molecular pathology and possible relationships with intraductal carcinoma.具有筛状形态的前列腺癌:诊断、侵袭性、分子病理学及与导管内癌的可能关系。
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2018 Jul;18(7):685-693. doi: 10.1080/14737140.2018.1469406. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
4
Prognostic Significance of Percentage and Architectural Types of Contemporary Gleason Pattern 4 Prostate Cancer in Radical Prostatectomy.当代前列腺癌 Gleason 模式 4 的百分比和结构类型对根治性前列腺切除术预后的意义。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2016 Oct;40(10):1400-6. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000691.
5
The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.2014年国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)前列腺癌Gleason分级共识会议:分级模式的定义及新分级系统的建议
Am J Surg Pathol. 2016 Feb;40(2):244-52. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000530.
6
Gleason grade 4 prostate adenocarcinoma patterns: an interobserver agreement study among genitourinary pathologists.Gleason 4级前列腺腺癌模式:泌尿生殖病理学家之间的观察者间一致性研究
Histopathology. 2016 Sep;69(3):441-9. doi: 10.1111/his.12976. Epub 2016 May 24.
7
Cribriform morphology predicts upstaging after radical prostatectomy in patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer at transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided needle biopsy.在经直肠超声(TRUS)引导下穿刺活检 Gleason 评分 3 + 4 = 7 的前列腺癌患者中,筛状形态可预测根治性前列腺切除术后分期升级。
Virchows Arch. 2015 Oct;467(4):437-42. doi: 10.1007/s00428-015-1809-5. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
8
Usual and unusual histologic patterns of high Gleason score 8 to 10 adenocarcinoma of the prostate in needle biopsy tissue.前列腺针芯活检组织中高 Gleason 评分 8 至 10 分腺癌的常见和不常见组织学形态。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2012 Jun;36(6):900-7. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3182495dee.
9
Utility of Gleason pattern 4 morphologies detected on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies for prediction of upgrading or upstaging in Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer.经直肠超声(TRUS)引导下活检检测到的Gleason 4级形态在预测Gleason评分3 + 4 = 7的前列腺癌升级或分期升高方面的效用
Virchows Arch. 2016 Sep;469(3):313-9. doi: 10.1007/s00428-016-1981-2. Epub 2016 Jul 10.
10
Clinical significance of subtypes of Gleason pattern 4 prostate cancer.Gleason 4级前列腺癌各亚型的临床意义
Transl Androl Urol. 2018 Sep;7(Suppl 4):S477-S483. doi: 10.21037/tau.2018.02.06.

引用本文的文献

1
Intermediate risk prostate tumors contain lethal subtypes.中度风险前列腺肿瘤包含致死性亚型。
Front Urol. 2024;4. doi: 10.3389/fruro.2024.1487873. Epub 2025 Jan 14.
2
Prospective selective embedding of radical prostatectomy specimens is not inferior to full embedding regarding established and new prognostic parameters.对于既定的和新的预后参数,前列腺癌根治术标本的前瞻性选择性包埋在效果上并不逊于完全包埋。
Virchows Arch. 2025 May;486(5):931-940. doi: 10.1007/s00428-024-03931-4. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
3
The presence of cribriform pattern in prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy is associated with negative postoperative pathological features.

本文引用的文献

1
Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate can evade androgen deprivation, with emergence of castrate-tolerant cells.前列腺管内癌可以逃避雄激素剥夺,出现去势耐受细胞。
BJU Int. 2018 Jun;121(6):971-978. doi: 10.1111/bju.14043. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
2
Presence of invasive cribriform or intraductal growth at biopsy outperforms percentage grade 4 in predicting outcome of Gleason score 3+4=7 prostate cancer.在活检中存在浸润性筛状或管内生长的情况下,预测 Gleason 评分 3+4=7 前列腺癌的结果优于 4 级百分比。
Mod Pathol. 2017 Aug;30(8):1126-1132. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2017.29. Epub 2017 May 19.
3
Impact of Gleason Subtype on Prostate Cancer Detection Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Correlation with Final Histopathology.
前列腺穿刺活检和根治性前列腺切除术中筛状模式的存在与术后病理特征不良相关。
Cent European J Urol. 2024;77(1):22-29. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2023.215. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
4
Enhancing PSMA PET/CT imaging of prostate cancer: investigating the impact of multiple time point evaluation, diuretic administration, cribriform pattern, and intraductal carcinoma.提高 PSMA PET/CT 成像在前列腺癌中的应用:探究多时间点评估、利尿剂给药、筛状模式和导管内癌的影响。
Ann Nucl Med. 2023 Nov;37(11):618-628. doi: 10.1007/s12149-023-01864-7. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
5
DNA Damage Repair Pathways in Prostate Cancer: A Narrative Review of Molecular Mechanisms, Emerging Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets in Precision Oncology.前列腺癌中的 DNA 损伤修复途径:精准肿瘤学中分子机制、新兴生物标志物和治疗靶点的叙事性综述。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jul 13;24(14):11418. doi: 10.3390/ijms241411418.
6
Artificial intelligence applications in prostate cancer.人工智能在前列腺癌中的应用。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2024 Mar;27(1):37-45. doi: 10.1038/s41391-023-00684-0. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
7
Prostate Cancer Morphologies: Cribriform Pattern and Intraductal Carcinoma Relations to Adverse Pathological and Clinical Outcomes-Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.前列腺癌形态学:筛状模式及导管内癌与不良病理和临床结局的关系——系统评价与荟萃分析
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Feb 21;15(5):1372. doi: 10.3390/cancers15051372.
8
Prostate Pathology: What is New in the 2022 WHO Classification of Urinary and Male Genital Tumors?前列腺病理学:2022 年世卫组织泌尿系统和男性生殖器官肿瘤分类有哪些新内容?
Pathologica. 2022 Feb;115(1):41-56. doi: 10.32074/1591-951X-822. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
9
Single cell analysis of cribriform prostate cancer reveals cell intrinsic and tumor microenvironmental pathways of aggressive disease.前列腺筛状癌的单细胞分析揭示了侵袭性疾病的细胞内在和肿瘤微环境途径。
Nat Commun. 2022 Oct 13;13(1):6036. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-33780-1.
10
Cribriform Patterned Lesions in the Prostate Gland with Emphasis on Differential Diagnosis and Clinical Significance.前列腺中的筛状病变:着重于鉴别诊断及临床意义
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jun 21;14(13):3041. doi: 10.3390/cancers14133041.
基于多参数磁共振成像的 Gleason 亚型对前列腺癌检出的影响:与最终组织病理学的相关性。
J Urol. 2017 Aug;198(2):316-321. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.077. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
4
Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator for Initial Prostate Biopsy by Incorporating the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology Gleason Grading and Cribriform growth.通过纳入 2014 年国际泌尿病理学会格里森分级和筛状生长,改进用于初始前列腺活检的 Rotterdam 欧洲前列腺癌筛查风险计算器。
Eur Urol. 2017 Jul;72(1):45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.01.033. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
5
Germline BRCA2 mutations drive prostate cancers with distinct evolutionary trajectories.胚系 BRCA2 突变驱动具有不同进化轨迹的前列腺癌。
Nat Commun. 2017 Jan 9;8:13671. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13671.
6
Blood-based and urinary prostate cancer biomarkers: a review and comparison of novel biomarkers for detection and treatment decisions.基于血液和尿液的前列腺癌生物标志物:用于检测和治疗决策的新型生物标志物综述与比较
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2017 Mar;20(1):12-19. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2016.59. Epub 2016 Dec 6.
7
Determination of the Association Between T2-weighted MRI and Gleason Sub-pattern: A Proof of Principle Study.T2加权磁共振成像与Gleason亚模式之间关联的确定:一项原理验证研究。
Acad Radiol. 2016 Nov;23(11):1412-1421. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.07.013. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
8
Histologic Grading of Prostatic Adenocarcinoma Can Be Further Optimized: Analysis of the Relative Prognostic Strength of Individual Architectural Patterns in 1275 Patients From the Canary Retrospective Cohort.前列腺腺癌的组织学分级可进一步优化:对来自金丝雀回顾性队列的1275例患者中个体结构模式的相对预后强度分析
Am J Surg Pathol. 2016 Nov;40(11):1439-1456. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000736.
9
Prostate cancer outcomes of men with biopsy Gleason score 6 and 7 without cribriform or intraductal carcinoma.活检Gleason评分为6分和7分且无筛状或导管内癌的男性前列腺癌预后
Eur J Cancer. 2016 Oct;66:26-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.07.012. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
10
Limitations in Predicting Organ Confined Prostate Cancer in Patients with Gleason Pattern 4 on Biopsy: Implications for Active Surveillance.在预测活检中出现格里森模式 4 的患者的器官局限型前列腺癌方面的局限性:对主动监测的影响。
J Urol. 2017 Jan;197(1):75-83. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.07.076. Epub 2016 Jul 22.