Said S, Omar K, Koetsawang S, Kiriwat O, Srisatayapan Y, Kazi A, Ajmal F, Wynter H H, Pretnar-Darovec A, Benitez I B
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Shatby Maternity Hospital, University of Alexandria, Egypt.
Contraception. 1987 Jun;35(6):591-610. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(87)80019-7.
A multicentered phase III clinical trial was conducted in seven countries to compare two dosages of depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA), 100mg and 150mg, given every 90 days. Contraceptive efficacy and side-effects of both regimens were reported previously. Their effect on vaginal bleeding patterns is the object of this paper. A total of 1216 women were randomly assigned to a dose group and 1156 of them provided a menstrual diary. The comparison of the bleeding patterns is made using a 90-day reference period approach and following the guidelines published by WHO. In addition, the longest bleeding/spotting episode and the longest bleeding/spotting-free interval are calculated over the entire diary length. The only difference found between the two dose groups is a higher incidence of amenorrhea with the 150mg regimen. Overall, there is a high degree of consistency between the reasons given by individual women for discontinuing the contraceptive method and their vaginal bleeding pattern during the 90 days preceding discontinuation. However the data revealed large between-centre differences, both in the incidence of specific patterns, and in the identification by women of bleeding problems as reasons for discontinuation. This last point suggests that the life-table analysis underestimates the true incidence of menstrual irregularities. Comments on the reference period analysis method are made.
在七个国家开展了一项多中心III期临床试验,以比较每90天注射一次的两种剂量醋酸甲羟孕酮长效针剂(DMPA),即100毫克和150毫克的避孕效果。两种给药方案的避孕效果和副作用已在之前报道过。本文的研究对象是它们对阴道出血模式的影响。共有1216名女性被随机分配到一个剂量组,其中1156名提供了月经日记。采用90天参考期方法并遵循世界卫生组织发布的指南对出血模式进行比较。此外,在整个日记记录期间计算最长出血/点滴出血期和最长无出血/点滴出血间隔。两个剂量组之间唯一的差异是150毫克给药方案的闭经发生率较高。总体而言,个体女性给出的停止使用避孕方法的原因与其在停止使用前90天内的阴道出血模式之间存在高度一致性。然而,数据显示,在特定模式的发生率以及女性将出血问题认定为停止使用的原因方面,各中心之间存在很大差异。最后这一点表明,生命表分析低估了月经不调的真实发生率。文中对参考期分析方法进行了评论。