Suppr超能文献

比较合成和天然来源的防暴剂的相对安全性评估。

Comparative safety evaluation of riot control agents of synthetic and natural origin.

机构信息

a Toxicology Laboratory , Defence Research & Development Establishment , Nagpur , India.

b Division of Pharmacology & Toxicology , Defence Research and Development Establishment , Gwalior , India.

出版信息

Inhal Toxicol. 2018 Feb;30(2):89-97. doi: 10.1080/08958378.2018.1451575.

Abstract

Riot control agents (RCA) are lachrymatory, irritating compounds which temporarily incapacitate the uncontainable crowd. Ortho-Chlorobenzylidene-malononitrile (CS), 2-chloroacetophenone (CN), dibenz[b,f]1:4-oxazepine (CR), and nonivamide (PAVA) are synthetic RCAs, while oleoresin extract of chili known as oleoresin capsicum (OC) a natural irritant has been in use by various law enforcement agencies. Though efficacy of these agents is beyond doubt, they suffer from certain drawbacks including toxicity, production cost, and ecological compatibility. Presently, we have evaluated the safety of CR, OC, and PAVA on inhalation variables along with oral lethality. Additionally, the liver function test (LFT) in serum and lungs function was evaluated in broncho-alveolar-lavage fluid (BALF), both collected on the 14th day after RCA exposure. Animals then sacrificed and histopathology of liver and lungs was carried out. Results showed OC and PAVA to be more toxic than CR with an oral LD of 150 and 200 mg/kg body weight, respectively, while CR was safe at >3 g/kg body weight. All three agents caused severe impairment of respiratory variables bringing down normal respiration by >80% with rise in sensory irritation. Recovery from the irritating effect of CR was more rapid than OC and PAVA. LFT and BALF variables were not significantly different from that of control. There were no remarkable histopathological changes in liver and lungs. Hence, as per results, CR is safest among all synthetic and natural origin RCAs and can be safely used for effective dispersion of disobedient mob.

摘要

防暴制剂(RCA)是催泪性刺激化合物,可暂时使无法控制的人群丧失能力。邻氯苯亚甲基丙二腈(CS)、2-氯苯乙酮(CN)、二苯并[b,f]1:4-恶嗪(CR)和非那胺(PAVA)是合成 RCA,而辣椒的油树脂提取物,俗称辣椒素(OC),作为一种天然刺激物,已被各种执法机构使用。虽然这些制剂的功效毋庸置疑,但它们存在某些缺点,包括毒性、生产成本和生态兼容性。目前,我们评估了 CR、OC 和 PAVA 在吸入变量以及口服致死性方面的安全性。此外,还在 RCA 暴露后第 14 天收集的支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)中评估了血清和肺中的肝功能测试(LFT)。然后处死动物,并对肝脏和肺部进行组织病理学检查。结果表明,OC 和 PAVA 比 CR 毒性更大,口服 LD50 分别为 150 和 200mg/kg 体重,而 CR 在>3g/kg 体重时是安全的。这三种制剂都严重损害了呼吸变量,使正常呼吸下降了>80%,同时感觉刺激增加。CR 的刺激性效应恢复比 OC 和 PAVA 更快。LFT 和 BALF 变量与对照组无显著差异。肝脏和肺部没有明显的组织病理学变化。因此,根据结果,CR 是所有合成和天然来源 RCA 中最安全的,可以安全用于有效驱散不服从的暴徒。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验