Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago.
Department of Communication, University at Albany, State University of New York.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Aug;147(8):1200-1210. doi: 10.1037/xge0000421. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
The future of groups of people is a topic of broad interest in society and academia. Nonetheless, relatively little is known about the manner in which people think about the collective future of groups, and whether personal and collective future thinking represent distinct domains of future-oriented cognition. In the present studies (N = 691), we used an adapted future fluency task to demonstrate a novel domain-by-valence interaction between personal and collective future thinking, such that U.S.-based participants were positively biased about their personal future while at the same time being negatively biased about the future of their country. We further present evidence that this valence-based dissociation extends into the distant future, emerges in a non-U.S. (Canadian) sample, depends on the individual's relation to the group, and has consequences for how people think about the world around them. Taken together, our findings represent the first behavioral evidence of a dissociation between personal and collective future thinking, and suggest that the study of collective future thinking represents a fruitful endeavor for psychological science. (PsycINFO Database Record
人群的未来是社会和学术界广泛关注的话题。尽管如此,人们对于人们如何思考群体的集体未来,以及个人和集体未来思维是否代表不同的未来导向认知领域,知之甚少。在本研究中(N=691),我们使用了一种经过改编的未来流畅性任务,来证明个人和集体未来思维之间存在新颖的领域-效价交互作用,即基于美国的参与者对自己的个人未来有积极偏见,而对自己国家的未来有消极偏见。我们进一步提供了证据表明,这种基于效价的分离延伸到了遥远的未来,出现在非美国(加拿大)样本中,取决于个体与群体的关系,并对人们如何思考周围的世界产生影响。总之,我们的发现代表了个人和集体未来思维之间分离的第一个行为证据,并表明集体未来思维的研究代表了心理科学的一项富有成效的努力。