• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者随机临床试验中头盔与面罩无创通气的一年结局。

One-Year Outcomes in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Enrolled in a Randomized Clinical Trial of Helmet Versus Facemask Noninvasive Ventilation.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Section of Pulmonary/Critical Care, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.

Department of Medicine, Internal Medicine Residency Program, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2018 Jul;46(7):1078-1084. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003124.

DOI:10.1097/CCM.0000000000003124
PMID:29595563
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6005726/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Many survivors of acute respiratory distress syndrome have poor long-term outcomes possibly due to supportive care practices during "invasive" mechanical ventilation. Helmet noninvasive ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome may reduce intubation rates; however, it is unknown if avoiding intubation with helmet noninvasive ventilation alters the consequences of surviving acute respiratory distress syndrome.

DESIGN

Long-term follow-up data from a previously published randomized controlled trial.

PATIENTS

Adults patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome enrolled in a previously published clinical trial.

SETTING

Adult ICU.

INTERVENTION

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary outcome was functional independence at 1 year after hospital discharge defined as independence in activities of daily living and ambulation. At 1 year, patients were surveyed to assess for functional independence, survival, and number of institution-free days, defined as days alive spent living at home. The presence of ICU-acquired weakness and functional independence was also assessed by a blinded therapist on hospital discharge. On hospital discharge, there was a greater prevalence of ICU-acquired weakness (79.5% vs 38.6%; p = 0.0002) and less functional independence (15.4% vs 50%; p = 0.001) in the facemask group. One-year follow-up data were collected for 81 of 83 patients (97.6%). One-year mortality was higher in the facemask group (69.2% vs 43.2%; p = 0.017). At 1 year, patients in the helmet group were more likely to be functionally independent (40.9% vs 15.4%; p = 0.015) and had more institution-free days (median, 268.5 [0-354] vs 0 [0-323]; p = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

Poor functional recovery after invasive mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome is common. Helmet noninvasive ventilation may be the first intervention that mitigates the long-term complications that plague survivors of acute respiratory distress syndrome managed with noninvasive ventilation.

摘要

目的

急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)幸存者的长期预后较差,可能与“有创”机械通气期间的支持治疗措施有关。ARDS 患者应用头盔式无创通气可降低插管率;但尚不清楚避免使用头盔式无创通气而插管是否会改变 ARDS 幸存者的结局。

设计

先前发表的随机对照试验的长期随访数据。

患者

先前临床试验中纳入的 ARDS 成年患者。

设置

成人 ICU。

干预

无。

测量和主要结果

主要结局为出院后 1 年时的功能独立性,定义为日常生活活动和步行的独立性。在 1 年时,通过问卷调查评估功能独立性、生存情况以及机构无天数,即生存在家中的天数。出院时,由盲法治疗师评估 ICU 获得性肌无力和功能独立性。与面罩组相比,在出院时头盔组 ICU 获得性肌无力的发生率更高(79.5% vs. 38.6%;p = 0.0002),功能独立性更低(15.4% vs. 50%;p = 0.001)。83 例患者中的 81 例(97.6%)完成了 1 年随访。面罩组 1 年死亡率更高(69.2% vs. 43.2%;p = 0.017)。在 1 年时,头盔组患者更可能达到功能独立性(40.9% vs. 15.4%;p = 0.015),机构无天数更多(中位数,268.5[0-354] vs. 0[0-323];p = 0.017)。

结论

急性呼吸窘迫综合征行有创机械通气后,功能恢复不良较为常见。头盔式无创通气可能是减轻接受无创通气治疗的 ARDS 幸存者长期并发症的首个干预措施。

相似文献

1
One-Year Outcomes in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Enrolled in a Randomized Clinical Trial of Helmet Versus Facemask Noninvasive Ventilation.急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者随机临床试验中头盔与面罩无创通气的一年结局。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Jul;46(7):1078-1084. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003124.
2
Effect of Noninvasive Ventilation Delivered by Helmet vs Face Mask on the Rate of Endotracheal Intubation in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial.头盔式与面罩式无创通气对急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者气管插管率的影响:一项随机临床试验
JAMA. 2016 Jun 14;315(22):2435-41. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.6338.
3
[Study of timing of invasive and noninvasive sequential ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome].[急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者有创与无创序贯通气时机的研究]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2014 May;26(5):330-4. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2014.05.009.
4
Comparison of the clinical outcomes of non-invasive ventilation by helmet vs facemask in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.头盔与面罩无创通气治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的临床结局比较。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jan 29;100(4):e24443. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024443.
5
Non-invasive ventilation by helmet more effective than face mask in acute respiratory distress syndrome.在急性呼吸窘迫综合征中,头盔无创通气比面罩无创通气更有效。
Lancet Respir Med. 2016 Aug;4(8):610. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)30183-7. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
6
Meta-analysis of the effects of helmet-assisted non-invasive ventilation in the treatment of acute respiratory failure.头盔辅助无创通气治疗急性呼吸衰竭的效果的荟萃分析。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2019 May;23(10):4382-4390. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201905_17945.
7
Noninvasive ventilation with a helmet in patients with acute respiratory failure caused by chest trauma: a randomized controlled trial.头盔无创通气在创伤性急性呼吸衰竭患者中的应用:一项随机对照试验。
Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 8;10(1):21489. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78607-5.
8
The Impact of Preintubation Noninvasive Ventilation on Outcomes in Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.预插管无创通气对小儿急性呼吸窘迫综合征结局的影响。
Crit Care Med. 2021 May 1;49(5):816-827. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004819.
9
Noninvasive ventilation with helmet versus control strategy in patients with acute respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled studies.急性呼吸衰竭患者使用头盔无创通气与对照策略的比较:对照研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Crit Care. 2016 Aug 23;20(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1449-4.
10
Use of noninvasive ventilation in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome due to accidental chlorine inhalation: a case report.意外吸入氯气导致的严重急性呼吸窘迫综合征中无创通气的应用:一例报告
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2017 Jan-Mar;29(1):105-110. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20170015.

引用本文的文献

1
ESICM guidelines on acute respiratory distress syndrome: definition, phenotyping and respiratory support strategies.急性呼吸窘迫综合征 ESICM 指南:定义、表型和呼吸支持策略。
Intensive Care Med. 2023 Jul;49(7):727-759. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07050-7. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
2
Long-term outcome of COVID-19 patients treated with helmet noninvasive ventilation vs. high-flow nasal oxygen: a randomized trial.头盔无创通气与高流量鼻导管吸氧治疗COVID-19患者的长期结局:一项随机试验。
J Intensive Care. 2023 May 19;11(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40560-023-00669-0.
3
Helmet trials: resolving the puzzle.

本文引用的文献

1
Noninvasive Ventilation of Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Insights from the LUNG SAFE Study.急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的无创通气。来自 LUNG SAFE 研究的见解。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Jan 1;195(1):67-77. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201606-1306OC.
2
Point Prevalence Study of Mobilization Practices for Acute Respiratory Failure Patients in the United States.美国急性呼吸衰竭患者动员实践的现况研究
Crit Care Med. 2017 Feb;45(2):205-215. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002058.
3
Mechanical Ventilation to Minimize Progression of Lung Injury in Acute Respiratory Failure.
头盔试验:解开谜团。
Intensive Care Med. 2023 Apr;49(4):458-461. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07004-z. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
4
Helmet noninvasive support for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: rationale, mechanism of action and bedside application.头盔无创支持治疗急性低氧性呼吸衰竭:原理、作用机制及床旁应用
Ann Intensive Care. 2022 Oct 14;12(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s13613-022-01069-7.
5
Awake Prone-Positioning in Patients on Non-Invasive Ventilation for Management of SARS-CoV-2 Pneumonia: A Systematic Review.清醒俯卧位通气在治疗 SARS-CoV-2 肺炎中的应用:一项系统评价。
Adv Respir Med. 2022 Aug 18;90(4):362-375. doi: 10.3390/arm90040046.
6
The use of head helmets to deliver noninvasive ventilatory support: a comprehensive review of technical aspects and clinical findings.使用头盔来提供无创通气支持:技术方面和临床发现的综合回顾。
Crit Care. 2021 Sep 8;25(1):327. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03746-8.
7
Helmet Non-Invasive Ventilation for COVID-19 Patients (Helmet-COVID): study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.COVID-19 患者头盔无创通气(Helmet-COVID):一项多中心随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 26;11(8):e052169. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052169.
8
The roles of noninvasive mechanical ventilation with helmet in patients with acute respiratory failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.头盔无创机械通气在急性呼吸衰竭患者中的作用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 15;16(4):e0250063. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250063. eCollection 2021.
9
Supporting the Quadruple Aim Using Simulation and Human Factors During COVID-19 Care.在 COVID-19 护理中使用模拟和人为因素支持四重目标。
Am J Med Qual. 2021;36(2):73-83. doi: 10.1097/01.JMQ.0000735432.16289.d2.
10
The use of oxygen hoods in patients failing on conventional high-flow oxygen delivery systems, the effects on oxygenation, mechanical ventilation and mortality rates in hypoxic patients with COVID-19. A Prospective Controlled Cohort Study.在常规高流量氧输送系统失败的患者中使用氧气罩,对 COVID-19 低氧血症患者的氧合、机械通气和死亡率的影响。一项前瞻性对照队列研究。
Respir Med. 2021 Apr;179:106312. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2021.106312. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
机械通气以尽量减少急性呼吸衰竭中肺损伤的进展。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Feb 15;195(4):438-442. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201605-1081CP.
4
Effect of Noninvasive Ventilation Delivered by Helmet vs Face Mask on the Rate of Endotracheal Intubation in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial.头盔式与面罩式无创通气对急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者气管插管率的影响:一项随机临床试验
JAMA. 2016 Jun 14;315(22):2435-41. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.6338.
5
A Randomized Trial of an Intensive Physical Therapy Program for Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure.一项针对急性呼吸衰竭患者的强化物理治疗方案的随机试验。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 May 15;193(10):1101-10. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201505-1039OC.
6
Failure of Noninvasive Ventilation for De Novo Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: Role of Tidal Volume.新发低氧性呼吸衰竭行无创通气失败:潮气量的作用。
Crit Care Med. 2016 Feb;44(2):282-90. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001379.
7
High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen in Respiratory Failure.高流量鼻导管吸氧治疗呼吸衰竭
N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct;373(14):1374-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1508390.
8
Rapidly reversible, sedation-related delirium versus persistent delirium in the intensive care unit.在重症监护病房中,快速可逆性镇静相关谵妄与持续性谵妄。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Mar 15;189(6):658-65. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201310-1815OC.
9
Early mobilization of mechanically ventilated patients: a 1-day point-prevalence study in Germany.机械通气患者的早期活动:德国的一项 1 天时点患病率研究。
Crit Care Med. 2014 May;42(5):1178-86. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000149.
10
Intensive care unit mobility practices in Australia and New Zealand: a point prevalence study.澳大利亚和新西兰重症监护室移动实践:一项时点患病率研究。
Crit Care Resusc. 2013 Dec;15(4):260-5.