From the Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition (Wolf, Willette), Iowa State University, Ames; Institute on Aging (Tsenkova, Ryff, Davidson), and Department of Psychology (Ryff, Davidson), University of Wisconsin-Madison; Center for Healthy Minds (Davidson), and Waisman Laboratory for Brain Imaging and Behavior (Davidson), University of Wisconsin-Madison; Departments of Psychology (Willette) and Biomedical Sciences (Willette), Iowa State University, Ames; and Department of Neurology (Willette), University of Iowa, Iowa City.
Psychosom Med. 2018 Jun;80(5):452-459. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000582.
Prediabetes and type 2 diabetes (i.e., hyperglycemia) are characterized by insulin resistance. These problems with energy metabolism may exacerbate emotional reactivity to negatively valenced stimuli and related phenomena such as predisposition toward negative affect, as well as cognitive deficits. Higher emotional reactivity is seen with hyperglycemia and insulin resistance. However, it is largely unknown how metabolic dysfunction correlates with related neural, hormonal, and cognitive outcomes.
Among 331 adults from the Midlife in the United States study, eye-blink response (EBR) we cross sectionally examined to gauge reactivity to negative, positive, or neutrally valenced pictures from international affect picture system stimuli proximal to an acoustic startle probe. Increased EBR to negative stimuli was considered an index of stress reactivity. Frontal alpha asymmetry, a biomarker of negative affect predisposition, was determined using resting electroencephalography. Baseline urinary cortisol output was collected. Cognitive performance was gauged using the Brief Test of Adult Cognition by telephone. Fasting glucose and insulin characterized hyperglycemia or the homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance.
Higher homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance corresponded to an increased startle response, measured by EBR magnitude, for negative versus positive stimuli (R = 0.218, F(1,457) = 5.48, p = .020, euglycemia: M(SD) = .092(.776), hyperglycemia: M(SD) = .120(.881)). Participants with hyperglycemia versus euglycemia showed greater right frontal alpha asymmetry (F(1,307) = 6.62, p = .011, euglycemia: M(SD) = .018(.167), hyperglycemia: M(SD) = -.029(.160)), and worse Brief Test of Adult Cognition by telephone arithmetic performance (F(1,284) = 4.25, p = .040, euglycemia: M(SD) = 2.390(1.526), hyperglycemia: M(SD) = 1.920(1.462)). Baseline urinary cortisol (log10 μg/12 hours) was also dysregulated in individuals with hyperglycemia (F(1,324) = 5.09, p = .025, euglycemia: M(SD) = 1.052 ± .332, hyperglycemia: M(SD) = .961 (.362)).
These results suggest that dysmetabolism is associated with increased emotional reactivity, predisposition toward negative affect, and specific cognitive deficits.
前驱糖尿病和 2 型糖尿病(即高血糖)的特征是胰岛素抵抗。这些能量代谢问题可能会加剧对负性刺激的情绪反应,以及对负性情绪的倾向等相关现象,以及认知缺陷。高血糖和胰岛素抵抗会导致更高的情绪反应。然而,代谢功能障碍与相关的神经、激素和认知结果如何相关在很大程度上尚不清楚。
在美国中年研究中,我们对 331 名成年人进行了横断面研究,通过眼跳反应(EBR)来评估对国际情感图片系统刺激的负性、正性或中性图片的反应性,这些刺激与声学惊跳探针接近。增加对负性刺激的 EBR 被认为是应激反应的指标。使用静息脑电图确定负性情绪倾向的生物标志物——额前 alpha 不对称。收集基础尿皮质醇输出。使用电话进行的成人认知简短测试来衡量认知表现。空腹血糖和胰岛素描述了高血糖或胰岛素抵抗的稳态模型评估。
胰岛素抵抗的稳态模型评估越高,EBR 幅度测量的负性与正性刺激之间的惊跳反应越大(R = 0.218,F(1,457)= 5.48,p =.020,血糖正常:M(SD)=.092(.776),高血糖:M(SD)=.120(.881))。与血糖正常相比,高血糖参与者的右额前 alpha 不对称更大(F(1,307)= 6.62,p =.011,血糖正常:M(SD)=.018(.167),高血糖:M(SD)= -.029(.160)),成人认知简短测试电话算术表现更差(F(1,284)= 4.25,p =.040,血糖正常:M(SD)= 2.390(1.526),高血糖:M(SD)= 1.920(1.462))。高血糖个体的基础尿皮质醇(log10μg/12 小时)也失调(F(1,324)= 5.09,p =.025,血糖正常:M(SD)= 1.052 ±.332,高血糖:M(SD)=.961(.362))。
这些结果表明,代谢紊乱与情绪反应增加、负性情绪倾向和特定认知缺陷有关。