• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

科研基金申请书撰写训练营:提升理工科领域学术女性研究能力的一项干预措施

Grant-Writing Bootcamp: An Intervention to Enhance the Research Capacity of Academic Women in STEM.

作者信息

Smith Jessi L, Stoop Chatanika, Young Micaela, Belou Rebecca, Held Suzanne

机构信息

Jessi L. Smith (

出版信息

Bioscience. 2017 Jul 1;67(7):638-645. doi: 10.1093/biosci/bix050. Epub 2017 Jun 7.

DOI:10.1093/biosci/bix050
PMID:29599541
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5862288/
Abstract

Broadening the participation of women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematical (STEM) fields is more than a social-justice issue; diversity is paramount to a thriving national research agenda. However, women face several obstacles to fully actualizing their research potential. Enhancing the research capacity and opportunity of women faculty requires purposeful changes in university practice. Therefore, we designed an intervention, a grant-writing bootcamp informed by self-determination theory (Deci and Ryan 2012), to support the participants' feelings of relatedness, autonomy, and competence. Three grant-writing bootcamps were run over an 18-month period. Using a pre- and post-test design over the span of 1 year (and contrasting results with a comparison sample who were not part of the intervention) showed that the women participating in the grant-writing bootcamp significantly increased the number of external grants submitted, the number of proposals led as principal investigator, the number of external grants awarded, and the amount of external funding dollars awarded.

摘要

扩大女性在科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)领域的参与度,这不仅仅是一个社会正义问题;多样性对于蓬勃发展的国家研究议程至关重要。然而,女性在充分发挥其研究潜力方面面临若干障碍。提高女性教员的研究能力和机会需要大学实践做出有目的的改变。因此,我们设计了一项干预措施,即一个基于自我决定理论(德西和瑞安,2012年)的科研基金申请书撰写训练营,以支持参与者的归属感、自主感和胜任感。在18个月的时间里举办了三期科研基金申请书撰写训练营。在1年的时间跨度内采用前测和后测设计(并将结果与未参与该干预措施的对照样本进行对比)表明,参加科研基金申请书撰写训练营的女性显著增加了提交的外部科研基金申请数量、作为首席研究员牵头的提案数量、获得的外部科研基金数量以及获得的外部资金数额。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3952/5862288/d104ef43601b/bix050fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3952/5862288/d104ef43601b/bix050fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3952/5862288/d104ef43601b/bix050fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Grant-Writing Bootcamp: An Intervention to Enhance the Research Capacity of Academic Women in STEM.科研基金申请书撰写训练营:提升理工科领域学术女性研究能力的一项干预措施
Bioscience. 2017 Jul 1;67(7):638-645. doi: 10.1093/biosci/bix050. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
2
Gender differences in research grant applications and funding outcomes for medical school faculty.医学院教员研究基金申请与资助结果中的性别差异。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2008 Mar;17(2):207-14. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2007.0412.
3
Biosciences Proposal Bootcamp: Structured peer and faculty feedback improves trainees' proposals and grantsmanship self-efficacy.生物科学提案训练营:结构化的同行和教师反馈提高了学员的提案和资助能力自我效能感。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 28;15(12):e0243973. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243973. eCollection 2020.
4
Twelve tips for writing educational research grant proposals.撰写教育研究资助提案的 12 个技巧。
Med Teach. 2012;34(6):450-3. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.668246. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
5
Facilitating faculty development and research through critical review of grant proposals and articles.通过对资助申请和文章的批判性审查来促进教师发展和研究。
Acad Med. 1994 Jan;69(1):62-4. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199401000-00018.
6
Comparing National Institutes of Health funding of emergency medicine to four medical specialties.比较美国国立卫生研究院对急诊医学与四个医学专业的资助。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Sep;18(9):1001-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01138.x. Epub 2011 Aug 19.
7
A Community-Academic Partnered Grant Writing Series to Build Infrastructure for Partnered Research.一个社区-学术合作的资助写作系列,用于为合作研究建立基础设施。
Clin Transl Sci. 2015 Oct;8(5):573-8. doi: 10.1111/cts.12327. Epub 2015 Sep 13.
8
Impact of a remotely delivered, writing for publication program on publication outcomes of novice researchers.远程授课的科研论文发表写作课程对新手研究人员论文发表成果的影响。
Rural Remote Health. 2018 May;18(2):4468. doi: 10.22605/RRH4468. Epub 2018 May 24.
9
Trends in National Institutes of Health Funding of Principal Investigators in Dermatology Research by Academic Degree and Sex.按学术学位和性别划分的皮肤科研究首席研究员 NIH 资助趋势。
JAMA Dermatol. 2016 Aug 1;152(8):883-8. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.0271.
10
Bursaries, writing grants and fellowships: a strategy to develop research capacity in primary health care.助学金、写作资助和奖学金:培养初级卫生保健研究能力的策略。
BMC Fam Pract. 2007 Apr 5;8:19. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-8-19.

引用本文的文献

1
Increasing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in the Health and Health Services Research Workforce: A Systematic Scoping Review.增加卫生与卫生服务研究人员队伍的多样性、公平性和包容性:一项系统性综述。
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 May;40(7):1487-1497. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09041-w. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
2
Research productivity and training support for doctoral students in the biological and biomedical sciences.生物与生物医学科学领域博士生的研究生产力与培训支持
FASEB Bioadv. 2023 Feb 14;5(3):131-148. doi: 10.1096/fba.2022-00117. eCollection 2023 Mar.
3
U.S. Women Faculty in the Social Sciences Also Face Gender Inequalities.

本文引用的文献

1
Journals invite too few women to referee.期刊邀请女性担任审稿人的人数过少。
Nature. 2017 Jan 25;541(7638):455-457. doi: 10.1038/541455a.
2
Analysis of National Institutes of Health R01 Application Critiques, Impact, and Criteria Scores: Does the Sex of the Principal Investigator Make a Difference?美国国立卫生研究院R01申请评审、影响及标准评分分析:首席研究员的性别有影响吗?
Acad Med. 2016 Aug;91(8):1080-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001272.
3
DIVERSITY IN SCIENCE. A recipe for change: Creating a more inclusive academy.科学中的多样性。变革之道:创建一个更具包容性的学术机构。
美国社会科学领域的女性教员也面临性别不平等问题。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 26;13:792756. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.792756. eCollection 2022.
4
Variations of a group coaching intervention to support early-career biomedical researchers in Grant proposal development: a pragmatic, four-arm, group-randomized trial.一种群组辅导干预措施的变化,旨在支持早期职业生物医学研究人员进行资助提案的开发:一项实用的、四臂、群组随机试验。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jan 10;22(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-03093-w.
5
Gender equity in epidemiology: a policy brief.流行病学中的性别公平:政策简报。
Ann Epidemiol. 2019 Jul;35:1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2019.03.010. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
Science. 2016 Apr 8;352(6282):148-9. doi: 10.1126/science.aad8493.
4
Now Hiring! Empirically Testing a Three-Step Intervention to Increase Faculty Gender Diversity in STEM.现正招聘!实证检验一项三步干预措施以增加STEM领域教师的性别多样性。
Bioscience. 2015 Nov 1;65(11):1084-1087. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biv138. Epub 2015 Oct 10.
5
The Role of Altruistic Values in Motivating Underrepresented Minority Students for Biomedicine.利他价值观在激励弱势群体学生投身生物医学领域中的作用。
Bioscience. 2015 Feb 1;65(2):183-188. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biu199.
6
National Institutes of Health addresses the science of diversity.美国国立卫生研究院探讨多样性科学。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Oct 6;112(40):12240-2. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1515612112. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
7
Gender contributes to personal research funding success in The Netherlands.在荷兰,性别因素会影响个人获得研究资金的成功率。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Oct 6;112(40):12349-53. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1510159112. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
8
Sex Differences in Institutional Support for Junior Biomedical Researchers.机构对初级生物医学研究人员支持的性别差异。
JAMA. 2015 Sep 15;314(11):1175-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.8517.
9
Gender balance: Women are funded more fairly in social science.性别平衡:在社会科学领域,女性获得的资金更为公平。
Nature. 2015 Sep 10;525(7568):181-3. doi: 10.1038/525181a.
10
Self-Determination Theory Applied to Health Contexts: A Meta-Analysis.自我决定理论在健康领域的应用:一项元分析。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Jul;7(4):325-40. doi: 10.1177/1745691612447309.