Brandeis University Schneider Institutes for Health Policy (CPT, GAR, DWG); Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Stanford School of Medicine (AHSH); Tufts University School of Medicine and Lemuel Shattuck Hospital (KIF); and Commonwealth Care Alliance, Boston, MA (BH).
J Addict Med. 2018 Jul/Aug;12(4):287-294. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000408.
ASAM's Standards of Care for the Addiction Specialist established appropriate care for the treatment of substance use disorders. ASAM identified three high priority performance measures for specification and testing for feasibility in various systems using administrative claims: use of pharmacotherapy for alcohol use disorder (AUD); use of pharmacotherapy for opioid use disorder (OUD); and continuity of care after withdrawal management services. This study adds to the initial testing of these measures in the Veteran's Health Administration (VHA) by testing the feasibility of specifications in commercial insurance data (Cigna).
Using 2014 and 2015 administrative data, the proportion of individuals with an AUD or OUD diagnosis each year who filled prescriptions or were dispensed appropriate FDA-approved pharmacotherapy. For withdrawal management follow up, the proportion with an outpatient encounter within seven days was calculated. The sensitivity of specifications was also tested.
Rates of pharmacotherapy for AUD ranged from 6.2% to 7.6% (depending on year and specification details), and rates for OUD pharmacotherapy were 25.0% to 29.7%. Seven-day follow up rate after withdrawal management in an outpatient setting was 20.5%, and an additional 39.7% in an inpatient or residential setting.
Application of ASAM specifications is feasible in commercial administrative data. Because of varying system needs and payment practices across health systems, measures may require adjustment for different settings. Moving forward, important focus will be on the continued refinement of these measures with the new ICD-10 coding systems, new formulations of current medications, and new payment approaches such as bundled payment.
ASAM 的《成瘾专科治疗标准》为物质使用障碍的治疗确立了适当的治疗标准。ASAM 确定了三个高优先级的绩效指标,用于在各种系统中使用行政索赔进行规范和测试,以确定可行性:酒精使用障碍(AUD)的药物治疗;阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)的药物治疗;以及戒断管理服务后的连续护理。本研究通过在商业保险数据(信诺)中测试这些措施的规范的可行性,为退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)中这些措施的初步测试增添了内容。
使用 2014 年和 2015 年的行政数据,每年患有 AUD 或 OUD 诊断的个体中,每年有多少人开出处方或配药适当的 FDA 批准的药物治疗。对于戒断管理的后续治疗,计算在七天内进行门诊治疗的比例。还测试了规范的灵敏度。
AUD 药物治疗的比例为 6.2%至 7.6%(取决于年份和规范细节),OUD 药物治疗的比例为 25.0%至 29.7%。在门诊环境中戒断管理后的七天内的随访率为 20.5%,在住院或住院环境中为 39.7%。
ASAM 规范在商业行政数据中的应用是可行的。由于不同的医疗系统在系统需求和支付实践方面存在差异,这些措施可能需要在不同的环境中进行调整。今后,重要的重点将是继续改进这些措施,采用新的 ICD-10 编码系统、当前药物的新配方以及捆绑支付等新的支付方法。