Schneider Institutes for Health Policy, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02454, USA.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2013 Jul;45(1):11-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2013.01.004. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
This paper presents the rationale and feasibility of standardized performance measures for use of pharmacotherapy in the treatment of substance use disorders (SUD), an evidence-based practice and critical component of treatment that is often underused. These measures have been developed and specified by the Washington Circle, to measure treatment of alcohol and opioid dependence with FDA-approved prescription medications for use in office-based general health and addiction specialty care. Measures were pilot tested in private health plans, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), and Medicaid. Testing revealed that use of standardized measures using administrative data for overall use and initiation of SUD pharmacotherapy is feasible and practical. Prevalence of diagnoses and use of pharmacotherapy vary widely across health systems. Pharmacotherapy is generally used in a limited portion of those for whom it might be indicated. An important methodological point is that results are sensitive to specifications, so that standardization is critical to measuring performance across systems.
本文介绍了药物治疗物质使用障碍(SUD)的标准化绩效衡量标准的基本原理和可行性,这是一种循证实践和治疗的关键组成部分,但经常被低估。这些衡量标准是由华盛顿圈制定和规定的,用于衡量在基于办公室的一般健康和成瘾专科护理中使用经 FDA 批准的处方药物治疗酒精和阿片类药物依赖的情况。这些措施已经在私人健康计划、退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)和医疗补助计划中进行了试点测试。测试结果表明,使用基于行政数据的标准化措施来衡量 SUD 药物治疗的总体使用情况和开始使用情况是可行和实用的。不同的医疗系统之间,诊断和药物治疗的使用情况存在很大差异。在可能需要的人群中,药物治疗的使用通常只局限在一小部分。一个重要的方法学观点是,结果对规范很敏感,因此标准化对于衡量跨系统的绩效至关重要。