Harris Alex H S, Weisner Constance M, Chalk Mady, Capoccia Victor, Chen Cheng, Thomas Cindy Parks
Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, CA (AHSH, CC); University of California, San Francisco, CA (CMW); Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA (CMW); Treatment Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA (MC); Academy Health, Washington, DC (VC); and Brandeis University, Waltham, MA (CPT).
J Addict Med. 2016 May-Jun;10(3):148-55. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000203.
In 2013, the American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM) approved its Standards of Care for the Addiction Specialist Physician. Subsequently, an ASAM Performance Measures Panel identified and prioritized the standards to be operationalized into performance measures. The goal of this study is to describe the process of operationalizing 3 of these standards into quality measures, and to present the initial measure specifications and results of pilot testing these measures in a large health care system. By presenting the process rather than just the end results, we hope to shed light on the measure development process to educate, and also to stimulate debate about the decisions that were made.
Each measure was decomposed into major concepts. Then each concept was operationalized using commonly available administrative data sources. Alternative specifications examined and sensitivity analyses were conducted to inform decisions that balanced accuracy, clinical nuance, and simplicity. Using data from the US Veterans Health Administration (VHA), overall performance and variation in performance across 119 VHA facilities were calculated.
Three measures were operationalized and pilot tested: pharmacotherapy for alcohol use disorder, pharmacotherapy for opioid use disorder, and timely follow-up after medically managed withdrawal (aka detoxification). Each measure was calculable with available data, and showed ample room for improvement (no ceiling effects) and wide facility-level variability.
Next steps include conducting feasibility and pilot testing in other health care systems and other contexts such as standalone addiction treatment programs, and also to study the specification and predictive validity of these measures.
2013年,美国成瘾医学协会(ASAM)批准了其针对成瘾专科医生的照护标准。随后,一个ASAM绩效指标小组确定了这些标准并将其按优先顺序排列,以便转化为绩效指标。本研究的目的是描述将其中3项标准转化为质量指标的过程,并展示这些指标的初始规范以及在一个大型医疗系统中对这些指标进行试点测试的结果。通过展示这个过程而非仅仅是最终结果,我们希望能阐明指标开发过程,以起到教育作用,同时也引发关于所做决策的讨论。
每个指标都被分解为主要概念。然后使用常见的管理数据源对每个概念进行操作化。对替代规范进行了审查并进行了敏感性分析,以指导在准确性、临床细微差别和简单性之间取得平衡的决策。利用美国退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)的数据,计算了119个VHA设施的总体绩效和绩效差异。
三项指标得以操作化并进行了试点测试:酒精使用障碍的药物治疗、阿片类药物使用障碍的药物治疗以及药物辅助戒断(即排毒)后的及时随访。每项指标都可以根据现有数据进行计算,并且显示出有很大的改进空间(无天花板效应)以及设施层面的广泛差异。
下一步包括在其他医疗系统以及其他环境(如独立的成瘾治疗项目)中进行可行性和试点测试,同时研究这些指标的规范和预测效度。