• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血管活性药物对严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者死亡率的影响:一项随机试验的网状Meta分析

The effect of vasoactive drugs on mortality in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. A network meta-analysis of randomized trials.

作者信息

Belletti Alessandro, Benedetto Umberto, Biondi-Zoccai Giuseppe, Leggieri Carlo, Silvani Paolo, Angelini Gianni D, Zangrillo Alberto, Landoni Giovanni

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.

University of Bristol, School of Clinical Sciences, Bristol Heart Institute, Bristol, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Crit Care. 2017 Feb;37:91-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.08.010. Epub 2016 Aug 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.08.010
PMID:27660923
Abstract

PURPOSE

Inotropes and vasopressors are cornerstone of therapy in septic shock, but search for the best agent is ongoing. We aimed to determine which vasoactive drug is associated with the best survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, BioMedCentral, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register were searched. Randomized trials performed in septic patients with at least 1 group allocated to an inotrope/vasopressor were included. Network meta-analysis with a frequentist approach was performed.

RESULTS

The 33 included studies randomized 3470 patients to 16 different comparators. As compared with placebo, levosimendan (odds ratio [OR], 0.17, 95%; confidence interval [CI], 0.05-0.60), dobutamine (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.09-0.99), epinephrine (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.13-0.96), vasopressin (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.16-0.89), and norepinephrine plus dobutamine (OR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.11-0.96) were significantly associated with survival. Norepinephrine improved survival compared with dopamine (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.66-1.00). Rank analysis showed that levosimendan had the highest probability of being the best treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Among several regimens for pharmacological cardiovascular support in septic patients, regimens based on inodilators have the highest probability of improve survival.

摘要

目的

强心剂和血管升压药是感染性休克治疗的基石,但寻找最佳药物的工作仍在进行中。我们旨在确定哪种血管活性药物与最佳生存率相关。

材料与方法

检索了PubMed、BioMedCentral、Embase和Cochrane中央注册库。纳入了在感染性患者中进行的随机试验,其中至少有一组被分配使用强心剂/血管升压药。采用频率学派方法进行网络荟萃分析。

结果

纳入的33项研究将3470例患者随机分配至16种不同的对照药物。与安慰剂相比,左西孟旦(比值比[OR],0.17;95%置信区间[CI],0.05 - 0.60)、多巴酚丁胺(OR,0.30;95% CI,0.09 - 0.99)、肾上腺素(OR,0.35;95% CI,0.13 - 0.96)、血管加压素(OR,0.37;95% CI,0.16 - 0.89)以及去甲肾上腺素加多巴酚丁胺(OR,0.4;95% CI,0.11 - 0.96)与生存率显著相关。去甲肾上腺素与多巴胺相比可提高生存率(OR,0.81;95% CI,0.66 - 1.00)。排名分析表明左西孟旦成为最佳治疗药物的概率最高。

结论

在感染性患者的几种药物性心血管支持方案中,基于血管扩张剂的方案提高生存率的概率最高。

相似文献

1
The effect of vasoactive drugs on mortality in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. A network meta-analysis of randomized trials.血管活性药物对严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者死亡率的影响:一项随机试验的网状Meta分析
J Crit Care. 2017 Feb;37:91-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.08.010. Epub 2016 Aug 13.
2
Levosimendan reduces mortality in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: A meta-analysis of randomized trials.左西孟旦降低严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的死亡率:一项随机试验的荟萃分析。
J Crit Care. 2015 Oct;30(5):908-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.05.017. Epub 2015 May 29.
3
Levosimendan does not provide mortality benefit over dobutamine in adult patients with septic shock: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.左西孟旦并未为脓毒性休克成年患者带来死亡率获益:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Clin Anesth. 2017 Jun;39:67-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.03.011. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
4
Mortality benefit of vasopressor and inotropic agents in septic shock: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.血管加压药和正性肌力药物在感染性休克中的死亡率获益:随机对照试验的贝叶斯网络荟萃分析
J Crit Care. 2014 Oct;29(5):706-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.04.011. Epub 2014 Apr 26.
5
THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF VASOPRESSORS FOR SEPTIC SHOCK PATIENTS: A SYSTEMIC REVIEW AND NETWORK META-ANALYSIS.血管加压药治疗脓毒性休克患者的疗效和安全性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Shock. 2023 Dec 1;60(6):746-752. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000002193. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
6
Days alive and free as an alternative to a mortality outcome in pivotal vasopressor and septic shock trials.作为主要血管加压药和脓毒性休克试验死亡率结局的替代指标,存活天数和无残疾天数。
J Crit Care. 2018 Oct;47:333-337. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.05.003. Epub 2018 May 12.
7
Vasopressors and Inotropes in Sepsis.脓毒症中的血管升压药与正性肌力药
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2017 Feb;35(1):75-91. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2016.09.005.
8
Effect of levosimendan on mortality in severe sepsis and septic shock: a meta-analysis of randomised trials.左西孟旦对严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克死亡率的影响:一项随机试验的荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 30;8(3):e019338. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019338.
9
Inotropic agents and vasodilator strategies for the treatment of cardiogenic shock or low cardiac output syndrome.用于治疗心源性休克或低心排血量综合征的正性肌力药物和血管扩张剂策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 5;11(11):CD009669. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009669.pub4.
10
Inotropic agents and vasodilator strategies for the treatment of cardiogenic shock or low cardiac output syndrome.用于治疗心源性休克或低心输出量综合征的正性肌力药物和血管扩张剂策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 29;1(1):CD009669. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009669.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
[S3 guideline on sepsis-prevention, diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up care-update 2025].[S3 脓毒症预防、诊断、治疗及随访指南 - 2025年更新版]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2025 Aug 18. doi: 10.1007/s00063-025-01317-1.
2
The Effects of Levosimendan on Microcirculation and Peripheral Perfusion in Septic Shock: A Pilot Study.左西孟旦对感染性休克患者微循环及外周灌注的影响:一项初步研究
Life (Basel). 2025 May 28;15(6):871. doi: 10.3390/life15060871.
3
Diagnostic values of noradrenaline administered dose, procalcitonin (PCT) and blood lactic acid for septic shock.
去甲肾上腺素给药剂量、降钙素原(PCT)及血乳酸对感染性休克的诊断价值
J Med Biochem. 2025 Mar 21;44(2):319-329. doi: 10.5937/jomb0-53853.
4
ADJUNCTIVE VASOPRESSORS AND SHORT-TERM MORTALITY IN ADULTS WITH SEPTIC SHOCK: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS.成人感染性休克患者辅助血管加压药物与短期死亡率:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Shock. 2025 May 1;63(5):668-676. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000002558. Epub 2025 Feb 7.
5
Sepsis-induced cardiogenic shock: controversies and evidence gaps in diagnosis and management.脓毒症诱导的心源性休克:诊断与治疗中的争议和证据空白
J Intensive Care. 2025 Jan 2;13(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s40560-024-00770-y.
6
Adjunctive Vasopressors in Patients with Septic Shock: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.脓毒性休克患者的辅助血管升压药:系统评价和荟萃分析方案
medRxiv. 2023 Jul 30:2023.07.29.23293364. doi: 10.1101/2023.07.29.23293364.
7
Expert consensus on blood pressure management in critically ill patients.危重症患者血压管理专家共识
J Intensive Med. 2023 Jul 14;3(3):185-203. doi: 10.1016/j.jointm.2023.06.001. eCollection 2023 Jul 31.
8
Circulatory shock in adults in emergency department.成人急诊科的循环性休克
Turk J Emerg Med. 2023 Jan 9;23(3):139-148. doi: 10.4103/2452-2473.367400. eCollection 2023 Jul-Sep.
9
Sepsis-Induced myocardial dysfunction: heterogeneity of functional effects and clinical significance.脓毒症诱导的心肌功能障碍:功能效应的异质性及临床意义
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jul 14;10:1200441. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1200441. eCollection 2023.
10
Ventriculo-arterial (un)coupling in septic shock: Impact of current and upcoming hemodynamic drugs.脓毒性休克中的心室-动脉(不)耦合:现有及即将出现的血流动力学药物的影响
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 May 30;10:1172703. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1172703. eCollection 2023.