Department of Psychology and Social Behavior, School of Social Ecology, University of California Irvine, 4201 Social and Behavioral Sciences Gateway, Irvine, CA, 92697-7085, USA.
Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunology, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
J Behav Med. 2018 Aug;41(4):516-527. doi: 10.1007/s10865-018-9921-z. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
Existing research on childhood adversity and health risk across the lifespan lacks specificity regarding which types of exposures to assess and when. The purpose of this study was to contribute to an empirically-supported framework to guide practitioners interested in identifying youth who may be at greatest risk for a lifelong trajectory of health disparities. We also sought to identify the point in childhood at which screening for adversity exposure would capture the largest group of at risk individuals for triage to prevention and intervention services. Participants (n = 4036) collected as part of the Midlife in the United States study reported their medical status and history including physical (cardiovascular disease, hypertension, obesity, diabetes, cancer) and mental health (depression, substance use problems, sleep problems). Participants indicated whether they were exposed to 7 adversities at any point in childhood and their age of exposure to 19 additional lifetime adversities before the age of 18. Parent drug abuse, dropping out or failing out of school, being fired from a job, and sexual assault during childhood exhibited the largest effect sizes on health in adulthood, which were comparable to the effects of childhood maltreatment. Childhood adversity screening in early adolescence may identify the largest proportion of youth at risk for negative health trajectories. The results of this descriptive analysis provide an empirical framework to guide screening for childhood adversity in pediatric populations. We discuss the implications of these observations in the context of prevention science and practice.
现有关于儿童期逆境与终生健康风险的研究在评估哪些暴露类型以及何时进行评估方面缺乏特异性。本研究旨在为一个经验支持的框架做出贡献,该框架旨在指导有兴趣识别可能面临终生健康差异风险最大的青年的从业者。我们还试图确定在儿童期进行逆境暴露筛查的时间点,以便为预防和干预服务筛选最大比例的高危个体。作为“美国中年研究”的一部分,参与者报告了他们的医疗状况和病史,包括身体(心血管疾病、高血压、肥胖、糖尿病、癌症)和心理健康(抑郁、物质使用问题、睡眠问题)。参与者表明,他们在儿童时期是否曾经历过 7 种逆境,以及在 18 岁之前经历过 19 种其他一生中的逆境。儿童时期父母吸毒、辍学或退学、被解雇以及性侵犯对成年后健康的影响最大,与儿童期虐待的影响相当。在青少年早期进行儿童逆境筛查可能会识别出最大比例的处于不良健康轨迹风险中的青年。本描述性分析的结果为在儿科人群中进行儿童逆境筛查提供了一个经验框架。我们将这些观察结果置于预防科学和实践的背景下进行讨论。