Suppr超能文献

修订童年不良经历筛查工具的证据:一项范围综述。

Evidence for Revising the Adverse Childhood Experiences Screening Tool: a Scoping Review.

作者信息

SmithBattle Lee, Loman Deborah G, Yoo Jee Hye, Cibulka Nancy, Rariden Christina

机构信息

Trudy Busch Valentine School of Nursing, Saint Louis University, 3525 Caroline Mall, St. Louis, MO 63104 USA.

出版信息

J Child Adolesc Trauma. 2021 May 6;15(1):89-103. doi: 10.1007/s40653-021-00358-w. eCollection 2022 Mar.

Abstract

The relationship between adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and risky behavior, chronic illness, and premature mortality is well documented. Despite this evidence, screening for ACEs in primary care settings remains limited. Objections to widespread screening include concerns that the original ACE screening tool limited childhood adversities to family and household dysfunction. The purpose of this scoping review is to describe current knowledge for expanding ACEs categories and revising the formatting and scoring of the screening tool. With the assistance of a medical librarian, we used a two-step process to conduct a systematic search in three databases (CINAHL, OVID Medline, PsycINFO). Our aim was to focus on articles that expanded ACE categories and/or revised the scoring or formatting of the ACE tool. Eighteen articles (reporting 19 studies) met criteria. A minimum of two authors extracted the relevant characteristics of the studies independently and conferred to reach agreement. The majority of studies broadened ACEs to include community and systemic categories; three studies revised the formatting or scoring of the ACE tool. Exposure to community violence (ECV) was the most frequently added category (15), followed by economic hardship in childhood (EHC) (13); bullying (10); absence/death of parent or significant others (9); and discrimination (7). This evidence supports the expansion of ACE screening tools for assessment of childhood trauma and timely treatment.

摘要

童年不良经历(ACEs)与危险行为、慢性病和过早死亡之间的关系已有充分记录。尽管有这些证据,但在初级保健环境中对ACEs进行筛查的情况仍然有限。对广泛筛查的反对意见包括担心最初的ACE筛查工具将童年逆境局限于家庭和家庭功能障碍。本范围综述的目的是描述关于扩展ACEs类别以及修订筛查工具的格式和评分的现有知识。在医学图书馆员的协助下,我们采用两步法在三个数据库(CINAHL、OVID Medline、PsycINFO)中进行系统检索。我们的目标是专注于扩展ACE类别和/或修订ACE工具评分或格式的文章。18篇文章(报告了19项研究)符合标准。至少两名作者独立提取了研究的相关特征并进行商讨以达成一致。大多数研究将ACEs扩展到包括社区和系统类别;三项研究修订了ACE工具的格式或评分。接触社区暴力(ECV)是最常新增的类别(15项),其次是童年经济困难(EHC)(13项);欺凌(10项);父母或重要他人缺席/死亡(9项);以及歧视(7项)。这一证据支持扩展ACE筛查工具以评估儿童期创伤并及时进行治疗。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Expanding the Original Definition of Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs).扩展童年不良经历(ACEs)的原始定义。
J Child Adolesc Trauma. 2018 Nov 12;12(3):289-306. doi: 10.1007/s40653-018-0237-5. eCollection 2019 Sep.
9
Investigating racial differences in clusters of adverse childhood experiences.探讨不良童年经历簇中的种族差异。
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2020;90(1):106-114. doi: 10.1037/ort0000405. Epub 2019 Feb 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验