• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

倡导物理科学与肿瘤学研究的新视野。

New Horizons in Advocacy Engaged Physical Sciences and Oncology Research.

作者信息

Samson Susan, Northey Jason J, Plaks Vicki, Baas Carole, Dean Ivory, LaBarge Mark A, Goga Andrei, Van't Veer Laura J, Weaver Valerie M

机构信息

Breast Science Advocacy Core (BSAC), Breast Oncology Program, University of California, San Francisco, CA, 94115, USA; Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, 94115, USA.

Department of Surgery and Center for Bioengineering and Tissue Regeneration, University of California, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.

出版信息

Trends Cancer. 2018 Apr;4(4):260-264. doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 Mar 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.trecan.2018.02.002
PMID:29606307
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6932745/
Abstract

To address cancer as a multifaceted adaptive system, the increasing momentum for cross-disciplinary connectivity between cancer biologists, physical scientists, mathematicians, chemists, biomedical engineers, computer scientists, clinicians, and advocates is fueling the emergence of new scientific frontiers, principles, and opportunities within physical sciences and oncology. In parallel to highlighting the advances, challenges, and acceptance of advocates as credible contributors, we offer recommendations for addressing real world hurdles in advancing equitable partnerships among advocacy stakeholders.

摘要

为了将癌症作为一个多层面的适应性系统来研究,癌症生物学家、物理科学家、数学家、化学家、生物医学工程师、计算机科学家、临床医生和倡导者之间跨学科联系的势头日益增强,这推动了物理科学和肿瘤学领域新科学前沿、原则和机遇的出现。在强调这些进展、挑战以及倡导者作为可信贡献者被认可的同时,我们还就解决倡导利益相关者之间推进公平伙伴关系的现实障碍提出了建议。

相似文献

1
New Horizons in Advocacy Engaged Physical Sciences and Oncology Research.倡导物理科学与肿瘤学研究的新视野。
Trends Cancer. 2018 Apr;4(4):260-264. doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
2
The NCI Physical Sciences - Oncology Network.美国国立癌症研究所物理科学-肿瘤学网络
Trends Cancer. 2018 Apr;4(4):e1-e6. doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2018.03.008. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
3
A Physical View of Cancer.癌症的实体观
Trends Cancer. 2018 Apr;4(4):257. doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2018.03.001. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
4
Engineering and physical sciences in oncology: challenges and opportunities.肿瘤学中的工程和物理科学:挑战与机遇。
Nat Rev Cancer. 2017 Nov;17(11):659-675. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2017.83. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
5
[Clinical research and human and social sciences at Cancéropôle PACA].[普罗旺斯-阿尔卑斯-蓝色海岸癌症防治联盟的临床研究与人文社会科学]
Med Sci (Paris). 2012 Mar;28 Spec No 1:5. doi: 10.1051/medsci/2012281s102. Epub 2012 Apr 9.
6
[Clinical research and human and social sciences at Institut National du Cancer (INCa)].[法国国立癌症研究所(INCa)的临床研究以及人文与社会科学]
Med Sci (Paris). 2012 Mar;28 Spec No 1:6. doi: 10.1051/medsci/2012281s103. Epub 2012 Apr 9.
7
Clinical Cancer Advances 2013: Annual Report on Progress Against Cancer from the American Society of Clinical Oncology.临床肿瘤进展 2013:美国临床肿瘤学会癌症进展年度报告。
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jan 10;32(2):129-60. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.7076. Epub 2013 Dec 10.
8
Clinical cancer research: the past, present and the future.临床癌症研究:过去、现在和未来。
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2014 Nov;11(11):663-9. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2014.153. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
9
Clinical Cancer Advances 2017: Annual Report on Progress Against Cancer From the American Society of Clinical Oncology.《2017年临床癌症进展:美国临床肿瘤学会抗癌进展年度报告》
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Apr 20;35(12):1341-1367. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.71.5292. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
10
Future cancer research priorities in the USA: a Lancet Oncology Commission.美国未来癌症研究重点:《柳叶刀·肿瘤学》委员会报告
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Nov;18(11):e653-e706. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30698-8. Epub 2017 Oct 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving the odds together: a framework for breast cancer research scientists to include patient advocates in their research.共同提高胜算:乳腺癌研究科学家将患者倡导者纳入其研究的框架。
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2022 Jun 30;8(1):75. doi: 10.1038/s41523-022-00440-y.
2
NCI's publication affiliation conundrum: Reframing innovation to incentivize an equitable path for advocate representation.美国国家癌症研究所的出版物归属难题:重新构建创新模式,以激励为倡导者代表提供公平的途径。
Transl Oncol. 2022 Feb;16:101325. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2021.101325. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
3
Education and Outreach in Physical Sciences in Oncology.肿瘤学中物理科学的教育与拓展。
Trends Cancer. 2021 Jan;7(1):3-9. doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2020.10.007. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
4
Promoting Scientist-Advocate Collaborations in Cancer Research: Why and How.促进癌症研究中的科学家-倡导者合作:为什么以及如何。
Cancer Res. 2018 Oct 15;78(20):5723-5728. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-1600. Epub 2018 Aug 17.

本文引用的文献

1
The PCORI Engagement Rubric: Promising Practices for Partnering in Research.患者为中心的结果研究所参与度评分标准:研究合作的成功实践
Ann Fam Med. 2017 Mar;15(2):165-170. doi: 10.1370/afm.2042.
2
Convergence of Implementation Science, Precision Medicine, and the Learning Health Care System: A New Model for Biomedical Research.实施科学、精准医学与学习型医疗保健系统的融合:生物医学研究的新模式。
JAMA. 2016 May 10;315(18):1941-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.3867.
3
From passengers to co-pilots: Patient roles expand.从乘客到副驾驶:患者角色的扩展。
Sci Transl Med. 2015 Jun 10;7(291):291fs25. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aac6023.
4
Human breast cancer invasion and aggression correlates with ECM stiffening and immune cell infiltration.人类乳腺癌的侵袭和侵袭性与细胞外基质硬化及免疫细胞浸润相关。
Integr Biol (Camb). 2015 Oct;7(10):1120-34. doi: 10.1039/c5ib00040h. Epub 2015 May 11.
5
Cancer research advocacy: past, present, and future.癌症研究倡导:过去、现在和未来。
Cancer Res. 2013 Aug 1;73(15):4611-5. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-4553-T. Epub 2013 May 29.
6
Patient advocacy in research: merely an afterthought?研究中的患者权益倡导:仅仅是事后的想法吗?
Patient. 2011;4(2):69-71. doi: 10.2165/11590710-000000000-00000.
7
How have patient advocates in the United States benefited cancer research?美国的患者权益倡导者如何推动了癌症研究?
Nat Rev Cancer. 2005 Jan;5(1):73-8. doi: 10.1038/nrc1530.