• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于区分嗜肺军团菌肺炎和肺炎链球菌肺炎的新型诊断评分系统。

A Novel Diagnostic Scoring System to Differentiate between Legionella pneumophila Pneumonia and Streptococcus pneumoniae Pneumonia.

作者信息

Saraya Takeshi, Nunokawa Hiroki, Ohkuma Kosuke, Watanabe Takayasu, Sada Mitsuru, Inoue Manami, Honda Kojiro, Oda Miku, Ogawa Yukari, Tamura Masaki, Yokoyama Takuma, Kurai Daisuke, Kimura Hirokazu, Ishii Haruyuki, Goto Hajime, Takizawa Hajime

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Japan.

Infectious Disease Surveillance Center, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Japan.

出版信息

Intern Med. 2018 Sep 1;57(17):2479-2487. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.0491-17. Epub 2018 Mar 30.

DOI:10.2169/internalmedicine.0491-17
PMID:29607950
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6172550/
Abstract

Objective We investigated a novel diagnostic scoring system to differentiate Legionella pneumophila pneumonia from Streptococcus pneumoniae pneumonia. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 62 patients with L. pneumophila pneumonia (L-group) and 70 patients with S. pneumoniae pneumonia (S-group). Results The serum sodium (Na) levels tended to be lower according to the severity [age, dehydration, respiratory failure, orientation disturbance, low blood pressure (A-DROP)] score in the L-group. On a multivariate analysis, we found that four factors were independent predictive markers for inclusion in the L-group: relative bradycardia [hazard ratio (HR) 5.177, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.072-24.993, p=0.041], lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels ≥292 IU/L (HR 6.804, 95% CI: 1.629-28.416, p=0.009), C-reactive protein (CRP) levels ≥21 mg/dL (HR 28.073, 95% CI: 5.654-139.462, p<0.001), and Na levels ≤137 meq/L (HR 5.828, 95% CI: 1.411-24.065, p=0.015). Furthermore, a total score [ranging from 0 to 4, the sum of the points for each factor (0 or 1)] ≥3 points indicated a higher probability of inclusion in the L-group than in the S-group. The diagnostic accuracy of a total score of 3 had a sensitivity of 36.3%, specificity of 100%, and area under the curve of 0.682 (95% CI: 0.558-0.806, p=0.004), and that of a total score of 4 had a sensitivity 27.4%, specificity of 98.2%, and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.627 (95% CI: 0.501-0.754, p=0.045). The diagnostic accuracy had low sensitivity but high specificity. Conclusions We found four markers that might be useful for differentiating L-group from S-group and created a novel diagnostic scoring system.

摘要

目的 我们研究了一种新型诊断评分系统,以区分嗜肺军团菌肺炎和肺炎链球菌肺炎。方法 我们回顾性分析了62例嗜肺军团菌肺炎患者(L组)和70例肺炎链球菌肺炎患者(S组)的临床资料。结果 L组中,血清钠(Na)水平根据严重程度[年龄、脱水、呼吸衰竭、定向障碍、低血压(A-DROP)]评分有降低趋势。多因素分析显示,有四个因素是L组独立的预测指标:相对心动过缓[风险比(HR)5.177,95%置信区间(CI):1.072-24.993,p=0.041]、乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)水平≥292 IU/L(HR 6.804,95% CI:1.629-28.416,p=0.009)、C反应蛋白(CRP)水平≥21 mg/dL(HR 28.073,95% CI:5.654-139.462,p<0.001)以及Na水平≤137 meq/L(HR 5.828,95% CI:1.411-24.065,p=0.015)。此外,总分[范围为0至4,每个因素(0或1)的得分总和]≥3分表明纳入L组的可能性高于S组。总分3分的诊断准确性的敏感性为36.3%,特异性为100%,曲线下面积为0.682(95% CI:0.558-0.806,p=0.004),总分4分的诊断准确性的敏感性为27.4%,特异性为98.2%,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.627(95% CI:0.501-0.754,p=0.045)。该诊断准确性敏感性低但特异性高。结论 我们发现了四个可能有助于区分L组和S组的指标,并创建了一种新型诊断评分系统。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de3c/6172550/036fdc18c72f/1349-7235-57-2479-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de3c/6172550/e2cb7ac217b5/1349-7235-57-2479-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de3c/6172550/2b5881d93d2e/1349-7235-57-2479-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de3c/6172550/02aba5f967f1/1349-7235-57-2479-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de3c/6172550/ed8a6a60c237/1349-7235-57-2479-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de3c/6172550/036fdc18c72f/1349-7235-57-2479-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de3c/6172550/e2cb7ac217b5/1349-7235-57-2479-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de3c/6172550/2b5881d93d2e/1349-7235-57-2479-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de3c/6172550/02aba5f967f1/1349-7235-57-2479-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de3c/6172550/ed8a6a60c237/1349-7235-57-2479-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de3c/6172550/036fdc18c72f/1349-7235-57-2479-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
A Novel Diagnostic Scoring System to Differentiate between Legionella pneumophila Pneumonia and Streptococcus pneumoniae Pneumonia.一种用于区分嗜肺军团菌肺炎和肺炎链球菌肺炎的新型诊断评分系统。
Intern Med. 2018 Sep 1;57(17):2479-2487. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.0491-17. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
2
Validation of a diagnostic score model for the prediction of Legionella pneumophila pneumonia.用于预测嗜肺军团菌肺炎的诊断评分模型的验证
J Infect Chemother. 2019 Jun;25(6):407-412. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2019.03.009. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
3
Clinical predictors for Legionella in patients presenting with community-acquired pneumonia to the emergency department.急诊科收治的社区获得性肺炎患者中军团菌的临床预测因素。
BMC Pulm Med. 2009 Jan 19;9:4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-9-4.
4
Diagnostic predictors of Legionella pneumonia in Japan.日本军团菌肺炎的诊断预测因素。
J Infect Chemother. 2018 Mar;24(3):159-163. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2017.12.009. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
5
Clinical presentation of Legionella pneumonia: Evaluation of clinical scoring systems and therapeutic efficacy.军团菌肺炎的临床表现:临床评分系统及治疗效果评估
J Infect Chemother. 2017 Nov;23(11):727-732. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Sep 23.
6
Legionella pneumonia due to non-Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1: usefulness of the six-point scoring system.非嗜肺军团菌血清群 1 导致的军团菌肺炎:六点评分系统的实用性。
BMC Pulm Med. 2017 Dec 16;17(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12890-017-0559-3.
7
Clinical potential of C-reactive protein and procalcitonin serum concentrations to guide differential diagnosis and clinical management of pneumococcal and Legionella pneumonia.血清 C 反应蛋白和降钙素原浓度在指导肺炎链球菌性肺炎和军团菌性肺炎鉴别诊断和临床管理中的临床潜力。
J Clin Microbiol. 2010 May;48(5):1915-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01348-09. Epub 2010 Mar 10.
8
Validating a clinical prediction score for Legionella-related community acquired pneumonia.验证军团菌相关社区获得性肺炎的临床预测评分。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 May 9;22(1):442. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07433-z.
9
Comparative study of community-acquired pneumonia caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophila or Chlamydia pneumoniae.肺炎链球菌、嗜肺军团菌或肺炎衣原体所致社区获得性肺炎的比较研究。
Scand J Infect Dis. 2004;36(5):330-4. doi: 10.1080/00365540410020091.
10
Pneumococcal and Legionella Urinary Antigen Tests in Community-acquired Pneumonia: Prospective Evaluation of Indications for Testing.社区获得性肺炎中肺炎球菌和军团菌尿抗原检测:检测适应证的前瞻性评估。
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 May 30;68(12):2026-2033. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy826.

引用本文的文献

1
A case of pneumonia after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后肺炎一例。
IJU Case Rep. 2024 Feb 27;7(3):213-216. doi: 10.1002/iju5.12705. eCollection 2024 May.
2
Severe Bacterial Pneumonia Due to Legionella longbeachae Transmitted from Potting Soil in Japan.日本盆栽土壤传播的长滩军团菌导致严重细菌性肺炎。
Intern Med. 2024 Jul 1;63(13):1951-1957. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.2590-23. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
3
Atypical Pathogens in Adult Community-Acquired Pneumonia and Implications for Empiric Antibiotic Treatment: A Narrative Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Ruling out Legionella in community-acquired pneumonia.排除社区获得性肺炎中的军团菌感染
Am J Med. 2014 Oct;127(10):1010.e11-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.03.042. Epub 2014 May 6.
2
Hyponatremia and anti-diuretic hormone in Legionnaires' disease.军团病中的低钠血症与抗利尿激素
BMC Infect Dis. 2013 Dec 11;13:585. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-585.
3
[A case of Legionnaires' infection with meningeal irritation and abnormal cerebrospinal fluid].[一例伴有脑膜刺激征及脑脊液异常的军团菌感染病例]
成人社区获得性肺炎中的非典型病原体及其对经验性抗生素治疗的影响:叙述性综述
Microorganisms. 2022 Nov 24;10(12):2326. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10122326.
4
A risk model to identify Legionella among patients admitted with community-acquired pneumonia: A retrospective cohort study.一种用于识别社区获得性肺炎住院患者中军团菌的风险模型:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Hosp Med. 2022 Aug;17(8):624-632. doi: 10.1002/jhm.12919. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
5
Accuracy of a score predicting the presence of an atypical pathogen in hospitalized patients with moderately severe community-acquired pneumonia.评分预测住院中重度社区获得性肺炎患者存在非典型病原体的准确性。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 May 3;22(1):424. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07423-1.
6
Hyponatremia in Infectious Diseases-A Literature Review.传染病中的低钠血症:文献综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 23;17(15):5320. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155320.
7
Clinical Presentation of Community-Acquired Legionella Pneumonia Identified by Universal Testing in an Endemic Area.社区获得性军团菌肺炎的临床特征:在流行地区进行通用检测识别。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 15;17(2):533. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020533.
Rinsho Shinkeigaku. 2013;53(7):526-30. doi: 10.5692/clinicalneurol.53.526.
4
[A case of severe Legionella pneumonia in which survival was achieved without sequelae with the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)].[一例使用体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)成功存活且无后遗症的重症军团菌肺炎病例]
Kansenshogaku Zasshi. 2013 May;87(3):375-9. doi: 10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi.87.375.
5
Clinical predictors for Legionella in patients presenting with community-acquired pneumonia to the emergency department.急诊科收治的社区获得性肺炎患者中军团菌的临床预测因素。
BMC Pulm Med. 2009 Jan 19;9:4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-9-4.
6
The JRS guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults: an update and new recommendations.成人社区获得性肺炎管理的日本呼吸学会指南:更新与新建议
Intern Med. 2006;45(7):419-28. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.45.1691. Epub 2006 May 1.
7
The diagnostic significance of relative bradycardia in infectious disease.相对缓脉在传染病中的诊断意义。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2000 Dec;6(12):633-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2000.0194f.x.
8
Hyponatraemia in legionnaires' disease.军团病中的低钠血症。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982 Apr 3;284(6321):1047.
9
Hyponatraemia in Legionnaires' disease.军团病中的低钠血症
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982 Feb 20;284(6315):558-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.284.6315.558.
10
Hyponatremia in legionnaires' disease.
Ann Intern Med. 1979 Jan;90(1):132-3. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-90-1-132_2.