Saraya Takeshi, Nunokawa Hiroki, Ohkuma Kosuke, Watanabe Takayasu, Sada Mitsuru, Inoue Manami, Honda Kojiro, Oda Miku, Ogawa Yukari, Tamura Masaki, Yokoyama Takuma, Kurai Daisuke, Kimura Hirokazu, Ishii Haruyuki, Goto Hajime, Takizawa Hajime
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Japan.
Infectious Disease Surveillance Center, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Japan.
Intern Med. 2018 Sep 1;57(17):2479-2487. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.0491-17. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
Objective We investigated a novel diagnostic scoring system to differentiate Legionella pneumophila pneumonia from Streptococcus pneumoniae pneumonia. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 62 patients with L. pneumophila pneumonia (L-group) and 70 patients with S. pneumoniae pneumonia (S-group). Results The serum sodium (Na) levels tended to be lower according to the severity [age, dehydration, respiratory failure, orientation disturbance, low blood pressure (A-DROP)] score in the L-group. On a multivariate analysis, we found that four factors were independent predictive markers for inclusion in the L-group: relative bradycardia [hazard ratio (HR) 5.177, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.072-24.993, p=0.041], lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels ≥292 IU/L (HR 6.804, 95% CI: 1.629-28.416, p=0.009), C-reactive protein (CRP) levels ≥21 mg/dL (HR 28.073, 95% CI: 5.654-139.462, p<0.001), and Na levels ≤137 meq/L (HR 5.828, 95% CI: 1.411-24.065, p=0.015). Furthermore, a total score [ranging from 0 to 4, the sum of the points for each factor (0 or 1)] ≥3 points indicated a higher probability of inclusion in the L-group than in the S-group. The diagnostic accuracy of a total score of 3 had a sensitivity of 36.3%, specificity of 100%, and area under the curve of 0.682 (95% CI: 0.558-0.806, p=0.004), and that of a total score of 4 had a sensitivity 27.4%, specificity of 98.2%, and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.627 (95% CI: 0.501-0.754, p=0.045). The diagnostic accuracy had low sensitivity but high specificity. Conclusions We found four markers that might be useful for differentiating L-group from S-group and created a novel diagnostic scoring system.
目的 我们研究了一种新型诊断评分系统,以区分嗜肺军团菌肺炎和肺炎链球菌肺炎。方法 我们回顾性分析了62例嗜肺军团菌肺炎患者(L组)和70例肺炎链球菌肺炎患者(S组)的临床资料。结果 L组中,血清钠(Na)水平根据严重程度[年龄、脱水、呼吸衰竭、定向障碍、低血压(A-DROP)]评分有降低趋势。多因素分析显示,有四个因素是L组独立的预测指标:相对心动过缓[风险比(HR)5.177,95%置信区间(CI):1.072-24.993,p=0.041]、乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)水平≥292 IU/L(HR 6.804,95% CI:1.629-28.416,p=0.009)、C反应蛋白(CRP)水平≥21 mg/dL(HR 28.073,95% CI:5.654-139.462,p<0.001)以及Na水平≤137 meq/L(HR 5.828,95% CI:1.411-24.065,p=0.015)。此外,总分[范围为0至4,每个因素(0或1)的得分总和]≥3分表明纳入L组的可能性高于S组。总分3分的诊断准确性的敏感性为36.3%,特异性为100%,曲线下面积为0.682(95% CI:0.558-0.806,p=0.004),总分4分的诊断准确性的敏感性为27.4%,特异性为98.2%,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.627(95% CI:0.501-0.754,p=0.045)。该诊断准确性敏感性低但特异性高。结论 我们发现了四个可能有助于区分L组和S组的指标,并创建了一种新型诊断评分系统。