Suppr超能文献

对有风险的照顾者进行筛查:家庭照顾者负担量表简版(BSFC-s)的扩展验证以及适用于在家照顾老年人的照顾者的有效分类系统

Screening for caregivers at risk: Extended validation of the short version of the Burden Scale for Family Caregivers (BSFC-s) with a valid classification system for caregivers caring for an older person at home.

作者信息

Pendergrass Anna, Malnis Cintia, Graf Uta, Engel Sabine, Graessel Elmar

机构信息

Center for Health Services Research in Medicine, Department for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (Germany), Schwabachanlage 6, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.

The Catholic University of Applied Sciences of North Rhine-Westphalia Department Social Services, Campus Paderborn (Germany), Leostraße 19, 33098, Paderborn, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr 2;18(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3047-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Informal caregivers' (CGs') subjective burden is an important aspect of the care situation because it is linked to various outcomes such as health, mortality risk, institutionalization, and caregiving style. The aims of this study were a) to examine the convergent and discriminant validity of the 10-item short version of the Burden Scale for Family Caregivers (BSFC-s) and b) to develop a valid classification system for interpreting BSFC-s scores.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, we analyzed data obtained from 386 informal CGs who applied for an initial grade or upgrade of the care level for the care recipient at the Medical Service of Compulsory Health Insurance Funds of Bavaria (Germany). To validate the BSFC-s, we analyzed the reliability and the convergent/discriminant validity. We calculated correlations with the short form of the Giessen Symptom Complaints List (GBB-24), the Caregiver Strain Index (CSI), the personal further development sub-scale of the Berlin Inventory of Caregivers' Burden with Dementia Patients (BIZA-D), and other scales for establishing informal CGs' situations. To develop the classification system, we compared the percentile ranks of the GBB-24 with the respective BSFC-s sum scores and their distributions and derived three classification categories.

RESULTS

Results confirmed the convergent and discriminant validity of the BSFC-s (GBB-24: r = 0.68; CSI: r = 0.70; BIZA-D: r = 0.16; p < 0.001). For informal CGs with low subjective burden, the risk of physical psychosomatic complaints was elevated to a less than average level (BSFC-s scores of 0-4). In those with a moderate subjective burden (BSFC-s scores of 5-14), the risk was elevated. In those with a high burden (BSFC-s scores of 15-30), the risk was substantially elevated.

CONCLUSIONS

The BSFC-s is a valid scale for measuring subjective burden in informal CGs. The risk of physical psychosomatic complaints, which is a consequence of subjective CG burden, can be determined by using the valid classification system to deduce the necessity for action and to give concrete recommendations for interventions. The BSFC-s should therefore be employed as a screening instrument in medical contexts and in counseling services for informal CGs.

摘要

背景

非正式照料者(CGs)的主观负担是照料情况的一个重要方面,因为它与各种结果相关,如健康、死亡风险、机构化和照料方式。本研究的目的是:a)检验家庭照料者负担量表简版(BSFC-s)10项版本的收敛效度和区分效度;b)开发一个有效的分类系统来解释BSFC-s得分。

方法

在这项横断面研究中,我们分析了从386名非正式照料者那里获得的数据,这些照料者向德国巴伐利亚州法定医疗保险基金医疗服务部门申请了照料对象护理等级的初始评定或升级。为了验证BSFC-s,我们分析了其信度以及收敛效度/区分效度。我们计算了它与吉森症状清单简版(GBB-24)、照料者压力指数(CSI)、柏林痴呆患者照料者负担量表中个人进一步发展子量表(BIZA-D)以及其他用于确定非正式照料者情况的量表之间的相关性。为了开发分类系统,我们将GBB-24的百分等级与各自的BSFC-s总分及其分布进行了比较,并得出了三个分类类别。

结果

结果证实了BSFC-s的收敛效度和区分效度(GBB-24:r = 0.68;CSI:r = 0.70;BIZA-D:r = 0.16;p < 0.001)。对于主观负担较低的非正式照料者,身心症状的风险升高至低于平均水平(BSFC-s得分为0 - 4)。对于主观负担中等的照料者(BSFC-s得分为5 - 14),风险升高。对于负担较高的照料者(BSFC-s得分为15 - 30),风险大幅升高。

结论

BSFC-s是测量非正式照料者主观负担的有效量表。照料者主观负担导致的身心症状风险可以通过使用有效的分类系统来确定,以推断行动的必要性并给出具体的干预建议。因此,BSFC-s应在医疗环境和针对非正式照料者的咨询服务中用作筛查工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/228a/5880098/37cc935caa9c/12913_2018_3047_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验