Dundee Institute for Healthcare Simulation, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK.
University of Dundee School of Medicine, Angus, Dundee, UK.
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Apr 2;18(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1158-6.
Medical schools globally are encouraged to widen access and participation for students from less privileged backgrounds. Many strategies have been implemented to address this inequality, but much still needs to be done to ensure fair access for all. In the literature, adverse circumstances include financial issues, poor educational experience and lack of professional-status parents. In order to take account of adverse circumstances faced by applicants, The University of Dundee School of Medicine offers applicants the opportunity to report circumstances which may have resulted in disadvantage. Applicants do this by completing a free text statement, known as an 'adversity statement', in addition to the other application information. This study analysed adversity statements submitted by applicants during two admissions cycles. Analysis of content and theme was done to identify the information applicants wished to be taken into consideration, and what range of adverse circumstances individuals reported.
This study used a qualitative approach with thematic analysis to categorise the adversity statements. The data was initially analysed to create a coding framework which was then applied to the whole data set. Each coded segment was then analysed for heterogeneity and homogeneity, segments merged into generated themes, or to create sub-themes.
The data set comprised a total of 384 adversity statements. These showed a wide range of detail involving family, personal health, education and living circumstances. Some circumstances, such as geographical location, have been identified and explored in previous research, while others, such as long term health conditions, have had less attention in the literature. The degree of impact, the length of statement and degree of detail, demonstrated wide variation between submissions.
This study adds to the debate on best practice in contextual admissions and raises awareness of the range of circumstances and impact applicants wish to be considered. The themes which emerged from the data included family, school, personal health, and geographical location issues. Descriptions of the degree of impact that an adverse circumstance had on educational or other attainment was found to vary substantially from statements indicating minor, impact through to circumstances stated as causing major impact.
全球的医学院都被鼓励为来自弱势群体背景的学生拓宽入学途径和扩大招生规模。为了解决这种不平等现象,已经实施了许多策略,但为了确保所有人都有公平的入学机会,仍有许多工作要做。在文献中,不利的情况包括经济问题、较差的教育经历和缺乏职业地位的父母。为了考虑到申请人面临的不利情况,邓迪大学医学院为申请人提供了一个机会,可以报告可能导致不利的情况。申请人通过完成一份名为“逆境声明”的免费文本陈述来做到这一点,该陈述是对其他申请信息的补充。本研究分析了在两个招生周期中申请人提交的逆境声明。通过内容和主题分析来确定申请人希望被考虑的信息,以及个人报告的不利情况的范围。
本研究采用定性方法和主题分析来对逆境声明进行分类。首先对数据进行分析,创建一个编码框架,然后将其应用于整个数据集。然后对每个编码段进行异质性和同质性分析,将段合并为生成的主题,或创建子主题。
数据集共包含 384 份逆境声明。这些声明详细说明了涉及家庭、个人健康、教育和生活环境的广泛情况。一些情况,如地理位置,在之前的研究中已经被确定和探讨过,而其他情况,如长期健康状况,在文献中受到的关注较少。情况的严重程度、声明的长度和详细程度在提交的材料中显示出很大的差异。
本研究增加了关于背景入学最佳实践的辩论,并提高了对申请人希望被考虑的情况和影响的认识。从数据中出现的主题包括家庭、学校、个人健康和地理位置问题。发现对逆境对教育或其他成就的影响程度的描述,从表示轻微影响到表示重大影响的陈述,差异很大。