Ruback R Barry, Gladfelter Andrew S, Lantz Brendan
Violence Vict. 2018 Apr 1;33(2):330-350. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-16-00173.
Data on the incidence and prevalence of hate crimes in the United States come primarily from the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR). Although UCR data undercount most crimes, hate crimes are particularly underreported, especially for some groups. We compare 2000-2011 UCR data in Pennsylvania to data from a state agency that came from police, media, and citizen reports. First, we find that the state-agency database is generally consistent with the UCR data, in terms of absolute counts, correlations, and predictors. Second, we find that UCR data underestimate hate crime rates by a factor of about 1.6 overall and by a factor of 2.5 for rural areas. Moreover, although UCR data on hate crimes show a decrease in the most recent 5-year period, the state agency data show that hate crime incident counts have not dropped. We suggest that using a broader index that includes both the UCR and a database like that in Pennsylvania will give a more complete picture of hate crime.
美国仇恨犯罪的发生率和流行率数据主要来自《统一犯罪报告》(UCR)。尽管UCR数据对大多数犯罪存在少报情况,但仇恨犯罪尤其报告不足,特别是对某些群体而言。我们将宾夕法尼亚州2000 - 2011年的UCR数据与一个来自警方、媒体和公民报告的州机构数据进行比较。首先,我们发现就绝对计数、相关性和预测因素而言,该州机构数据库总体上与UCR数据一致。其次,我们发现UCR数据总体上低估仇恨犯罪率约1.6倍,农村地区则低估2.5倍。此外,尽管UCR关于仇恨犯罪的数据显示最近5年有所下降,但该州机构数据表明仇恨犯罪事件计数并未下降。我们建议使用一个更广泛的指数,包括UCR和类似宾夕法尼亚州那样的数据库,将能更全面地呈现仇恨犯罪情况。