Fuller Gary
Philosophy and Religion Department, Central Michigan University, USA.
Stud Hist Philos Sci. 2018 Apr;68:31-36. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
In the philosophy of mind and psychology, a central question since the 1960s has been that of how to give a philosophically adequate formulation of mind-body physicalism. A large quantity of work on the topic has been done in the interim. There have been, and continue to be, extensive discussions of the ideas of physicalism, identity, functionalism, realization, and constitution. My aim in this paper is a modest one: it is to get clearer about these ideas and some of their interrelations. After providing some background and history, I shall focus on two related topics: the distinction between a functional property and a structural one and the dispute over whether a realization account of the mental-physical relation provides a better physicalist account than a constitutional account.
在心灵哲学和心理学中,自20世纪60年代以来的一个核心问题一直是如何从哲学角度对身心物理主义进行恰当的阐述。在此期间,围绕该主题已经开展了大量工作。关于物理主义、同一性、功能主义、实现和构成等概念,过去进行过广泛讨论,并且仍在继续。本文的目的较为适度:旨在更清晰地理解这些概念及其相互关系。在提供一些背景和历史之后,我将聚焦于两个相关主题:功能属性与结构属性之间的区别,以及关于心理 - 物理关系的实现解释是否比构成解释能提供更好的物理主义解释的争论。