Suppr超能文献

当代计算神经科学中,心灵是否存在于大脑之中?

Is the mind in the brain in contemporary computational neuroscience?

机构信息

Philosophy Department, University of Haifa, 199 Aba Khoushy Ave. Mount Carmel, Haifa, 3498838, Israel.

Program in History and Philosophy of Science, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91905, Israel.

出版信息

Stud Hist Philos Sci. 2023 Aug;100:64-80. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2023.05.007. Epub 2023 Jun 22.

Abstract

According to contemporary computational neuroscience the mental is associated with computations implemented in the brain. We analyze in physical terms based on recent results in the foundations of statistical mechanics two well-known (independent) problems that arise for this approach: the problem of multiple-computations and the problem of multiple-realization. We show that within the computational theory of the mind the two problems are insoluble by the physics of the brain. We further show that attempts to solve the problems by the interactions of the systems implementing the computations with an environment (in or outside the brain) must introduce non-physical factors, and therefore fail on physical grounds. We also show that the problems are endemic and pertain to other forms of functional theories of the mind, most notably, causal functionalism. Finally, we propose a physicalist reductive identity theory, which is a generalization of statistical mechanics for all the special sciences, and show that only a theory of this kind can provide physical solutions to the above two problems in computational neuroscience. We conclude that functionalism in the theory of mind must be replaced with a reductive identity theory. This result has far-reaching implications with respect to the research programs in brain science.

摘要

根据当代计算神经科学,心理与大脑中实现的计算有关。我们基于统计力学基础的最新结果从物理角度分析了该方法中出现的两个著名(独立)问题:多次计算问题和多次实现问题。我们表明,在心智的计算理论中,这两个问题是由大脑的物理学无法解决的。我们进一步表明,通过实现计算的系统与环境(大脑内外)的相互作用来解决这些问题,必须引入非物理因素,因此从物理角度来看是失败的。我们还表明,这些问题是普遍存在的,并且与心智的其他形式的功能理论有关,尤其是因果功能主义。最后,我们提出了一种物理主义的简化同型理论,这是一种适用于所有特殊科学的统计力学的推广,并表明只有这种理论才能为计算神经科学中的上述两个问题提供物理解决方案。我们得出结论,心智理论中的功能主义必须用简化同型理论来取代。这一结果对脑科学的研究计划具有深远的影响。

相似文献

1
Is the mind in the brain in contemporary computational neuroscience?
Stud Hist Philos Sci. 2023 Aug;100:64-80. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2023.05.007. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
3
The mind-body problem.
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2018 Jul;9(4):e1463. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1463. Epub 2018 May 4.
4
Mind Causality: A Computational Neuroscience Approach.
Front Comput Neurosci. 2021 Jul 8;15:706505. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2021.706505. eCollection 2021.
5
Physicalism, realization, and structure.
Stud Hist Philos Sci. 2018 Apr;68:31-36. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
6
A Neuroscience Levels of Explanation Approach to the Mind and the Brain.
Front Comput Neurosci. 2021 Apr 7;15:649679. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2021.649679. eCollection 2021.
7
Can Neuroscientists Test a New Physicalist Mind/Body View: DiCoToP (Diachronic Conjunctive Token Physicalism)?
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Dec 17;15:786133. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.786133. eCollection 2021.
8
Reincarnating the Identity Theory.
Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 24;9:2044. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02044. eCollection 2018.
9
The historical and philosophical roots of emergentism in the neurosciences.
J Hist Neurosci. 2024 Jan-Mar;33(1):73-88. doi: 10.1080/0964704X.2023.2248193. Epub 2023 Sep 8.
10
[Psychiatry without mind?].
Encephale. 2021 Dec;47(6):605-612. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2021.05.006. Epub 2021 Sep 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验