Kenneth S. Pitzer Center for Theoretical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry , University of California at Berkeley , Berkeley , California 94720 , United States.
Chemical Sciences Division , Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory , Berkeley , California 94720 , United States.
J Chem Theory Comput. 2018 May 8;14(5):2401-2417. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b01256. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
Charge-transfer (CT) is an important binding force in the formation of intermolecular complexes, and there have been a variety of theoretical models proposed to quantify this effect. These approaches, which typically rely on a definition of a "CT-free" state based on a partition of the system, sometimes yield significantly different results for a given intermolecular complex. Two widely used definitions of the "CT-free" state, the absolutely localized molecular orbitals (ALMO) method (where only on-fragment orbital mixings are permitted) and the constrained density functional theory (CDFT) approach (where fragment electron populations are fixed), are carefully examined in this work. Natural bond orbital (NBO) and the regularized symmetry-adapted perturbation theory (SAPT) are also briefly considered. Results for the ALMO and CDFT definitions of CT are compared on a broad range of model systems, including hydrogen-bonding systems, borane complexes, metal-carbonyl complexes, and complexes formed by water and metal cations. For most of these systems, CDFT yields a much smaller equilibrium CT energy compared to that given by the ALMO-based definition. This is mainly because the CDFT population constraint does not fully inhibit CT, which means that the CDFT "CT-free" state is in fact CT-contaminated. Examples of this contamination include (i) matching forward and backward donation (e.g., formic acid dimer) and (ii) unidirectional CT without changing fragment populations. The magnitude of the latter effect is quantified in systems such as the water dimer by employing a 3-space density constraint in addition to the orbital constraint. Furthermore, by means of the adiabatic EDA, it is shown that several observable effects of CT, such as the "pyramidalization" of the planar BH molecule upon the complexation with Lewis bases, already appear on the "CT-free" CDFT surface. These results reveal the essential distinctions between the ALMO and CDFT definitions of CT and suggest that the former is more consistent with accepted understanding of the role of CT in intermolecular binding.
电荷转移 (CT) 是形成分子间复合物的重要结合力,已经提出了各种理论模型来量化这种效应。这些方法通常依赖于基于系统划分的“无 CT”状态的定义,对于给定的分子间复合物,有时会产生显著不同的结果。在这项工作中,仔细研究了两种广泛使用的“无 CT”状态定义,即绝对局域分子轨道 (ALMO) 方法(仅允许片段内轨道混合)和约束密度泛函理论 (CDFT) 方法(其中片段电子密度固定)。自然键轨道 (NBO) 和正则化对称自适应微扰理论 (SAPT) 也被简要考虑。在广泛的模型系统上比较了 ALMO 和 CDFT 对 CT 的定义,包括氢键系统、硼烷配合物、金属羰基配合物以及水和金属阳离子形成的配合物。对于大多数这些系统,与基于 ALMO 的定义相比,CDFT 给出的平衡 CT 能要小得多。这主要是因为 CDFT 人口约束不能完全抑制 CT,这意味着 CDFT“无 CT”状态实际上是 CT 污染的。这种污染的例子包括(i)匹配正向和反向供体(例如,甲酸二聚体)和(ii)不改变片段密度的单向 CT。通过在轨道约束之外还采用 3 空间密度约束,在水二聚体等系统中定量了后一种效应的大小。此外,通过绝热 EDA,表明 CT 的几个可观察效应,例如平面 BH 分子在与路易斯碱络合时的“三角化”,已经出现在“无 CT”CDFT 表面上。这些结果揭示了 ALMO 和 CDFT 对 CT 的定义之间的基本区别,并表明前者与 CT 在分子间结合中的作用的公认理解更一致。