Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Santa Casa de São Paulo School of Medical Sciences, São Paulo, Brazil.
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Santa Casa de São Paulo School of Medical Sciences, São Paulo, Brazil.
BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Apr 3;18(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3069-x.
Conventional local treatment for medullary osteomyelitis (OM) includes insertion of antibiotic-loaded polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement. Nevertheless, PMMA may delivery irregular concentration of antibiotic to surrounding tissue. We aimed to compare the in vitro antibacterial activity of Bioactive Glass (BAG) S53P4, which is a compound showing local antibacterial activity, to that of antibiotic-loaded PMMA against multidrug resistant bacteria from OM isolates.
We studied convenience samples of multidrug resistant (MDR) microorganisms obtained from patients presenting OM and prosthetic joint infection (PJI). Mixtures containing tryptic soy broth (TSB) and inert glass beads (2 mm), BAG-S53P4 granules (0.5-0.8 mm and < 45 mm) and Gentamicin or Vancomycin-loaded PMMA beads were inoculated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (MR-CoNS), Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates. Glass beads (2.0 mm) were used as a control. Antibacterial activity was evaluated by means of time-kill curve, through seeding the strains on blood agar plates, and subsequently performing colony counts after 24, 48, 72, 96, 120 and 168 h of incubation. Differences between groups were evaluated by means of two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Bonferroni's t test.
Inhibition of bacterial growth started soon after 48 h of incubation, reached zero CFU/ml between 120 and 168 h of incubation for both antibiotic-loaded PMMA and BAG S53P4 groups, in comparison with inert glass (p < 0.05). No difference regarding time-kill curves between antibiotic-loaded PMMA and BAG S53P4 was observed.
BAG S53P4 presented antibacterial properties as much as antibiotic-loaded PMMA for MDR bacteria producing OM and PJI.
治疗骨髓炎(OM)的传统局部治疗包括植入载抗生素的聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)水泥。然而,PMMA 可能会向周围组织输送不均匀浓度的抗生素。我们旨在比较生物活性玻璃(BAG)S53P4 的体外抗菌活性,BAG S53P4 是一种具有局部抗菌活性的化合物,与 OM 分离株中的多药耐药菌对抗生素载 PMMA 的抗菌活性。
我们研究了来自患有 OM 和人工关节感染(PJI)的患者的多药耐药(MDR)微生物的方便样本。含有胰蛋白酶大豆肉汤(TSB)和惰性玻璃珠(2 毫米)、BAG-S53P4 颗粒(0.5-0.8 毫米和<45 毫米)和庆大霉素或万古霉素载 PMMA 珠的混合物用耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)和耐甲氧西林凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(MR-CoNS)、铜绿假单胞菌或肺炎克雷伯菌分离物接种。使用 2.0 毫米的玻璃珠作为对照。通过在血琼脂平板上接种菌株并随后在孵育 24、48、72、96、120 和 168 小时后进行菌落计数来评估抗菌活性。通过双因素方差分析(ANOVA)和 Bonferroni t 检验评估组间差异。
在孵育 48 小时后,细菌生长的抑制很快开始,在 120-168 小时孵育期间,抗生素载 PMMA 和 BAG S53P4 组的细菌生长均达到零 CFU/ml,与惰性玻璃相比(p<0.05)。抗生素载 PMMA 和 BAG S53P4 之间的时间杀灭曲线没有差异。
BAG S53P4 对产生 OM 和 PJI 的 MDR 细菌具有与抗生素载 PMMA 相同的抗菌特性。