• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

妇科癌症患者盆腔廓清术前和术后患者报告结局的前瞻性评估。

Prospective assessment of patient-reported outcomes in gynecologic cancer patients before and after pelvic exenteration.

机构信息

Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States.

Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States.

出版信息

Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Jun;149(3):484-490. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.03.054. Epub 2018 Apr 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.03.054
PMID:29622276
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5986607/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Pelvic exenteration (PE) is a surgical procedure associated with significant morbidity offered to select women with locally advanced or recurrent gynecologic cancers. This ongoing study examines an array of patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction with PE.

METHODS

Since February 2009, prospectively enrolled participants completed questionnaires evaluating body image (BIS), depression (CESD), social support (DUFSS), symptoms (MDASI), sexual function (SAQ), functional status (SF-12), quality of life (The Stoma-QOL), satisfaction with decision (SWD) and an investigator-designed survey at baseline, 6, and 12months after PE. Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to evaluate the data.

RESULTS

Fifty-four women enrolled. Median age was 56years (31, 85). Median BMI was 30.7kg/m (16.8, 54.4). The majority of patients (78%) were white. Cancer diagnoses included 41% cervix, 22% uterus, 19% vagina, 17% vulva and 2% ovary. Most surgeries were total PEs (76%). Patients were satisfied with their decision to undergo PE at 6 and 12months. One year after exenteration, 79% of women stated they would have a PE again. Sexual pleasure decreased from baseline to 12months after PE (p=0.02), while sexual discomfort remained unchanged (p=0.42). Body image worsened over time (p=0.003). Physical functioning (SF-12) declined (p=0.001), while mental functioning remained stable (p=0.46). There were no significant changes in stoma-related QOL, social support, or depression scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a decrease in physical functioning, persistent low body image and sexual pleasure, most women were satisfied with their decision and would undergo pelvic exenteration again. This study identifies survivorship issues that should be addressed after PE.

摘要

目的

盆腔廓清术(PE)是一种与显著发病率相关的手术,仅提供给少数局部晚期或复发性妇科癌症患者。本研究正在调查一系列患者报告的结局和对 PE 的满意度。

方法

自 2009 年 2 月以来,前瞻性入组的参与者完成了评估体像(BIS)、抑郁(CESD)、社会支持(DUFSS)、症状(MDASI)、性功能(SAQ)、功能状态(SF-12)、生活质量(Stoma-QOL)、决策满意度(SWD)以及研究者设计的调查的问卷。在 PE 前、6 个月和 12 个月时进行基线评估。采用 Mann-Whitney 和 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验进行数据分析。

结果

共有 54 名女性入组。中位年龄为 56 岁(31,85)。中位 BMI 为 30.7kg/m(16.8,54.4)。大多数患者(78%)为白人。癌症诊断包括 41%的宫颈癌、22%的子宫癌、19%的阴道癌、17%的外阴癌和 2%的卵巢癌。大多数手术为全盆腔廓清术(76%)。患者在 6 个月和 12 个月时对接受 PE 的决定表示满意。1 年后,79%的女性表示会再次接受 PE。PE 后 12 个月时,性愉悦感较基线下降(p=0.02),而性不适保持不变(p=0.42)。体像随时间恶化(p=0.003)。身体机能(SF-12)下降(p=0.001),而心理机能保持稳定(p=0.46)。在与造口相关的生活质量、社会支持或抑郁评分方面没有显著变化。

结论

尽管身体机能下降、持续的低体像和性愉悦感,但大多数患者对其决策表示满意,并会再次接受盆腔廓清术。本研究确定了 PE 后应解决的生存问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05da/5986607/3c79167027cc/nihms957724f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05da/5986607/3c79167027cc/nihms957724f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05da/5986607/3c79167027cc/nihms957724f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Prospective assessment of patient-reported outcomes in gynecologic cancer patients before and after pelvic exenteration.妇科癌症患者盆腔廓清术前和术后患者报告结局的前瞻性评估。
Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Jun;149(3):484-490. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.03.054. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
2
A prospective study of quality of life in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration: interim results.盆腔廓清术患者生活质量的前瞻性研究:中期结果。
Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Feb;128(2):191-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.09.030. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
3
Prospective Assessment of First-Year Quality of Life After Pelvic Exenteration for Gynecologic Malignancy: A French Multicentric Study.妇科恶性肿瘤盆腔脏器切除术后第一年生活质量的前瞻性评估:一项法国多中心研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Feb;25(2):535-541. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-6120-z. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
4
Quality of life after pelvic exenteration for gynecologic cancer: Findings from a qualitative study.妇科癌症盆腔廓清术后的生活质量:一项定性研究的结果。
Psychooncology. 2018 Oct;27(10):2357-2362. doi: 10.1002/pon.4832. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
5
Quality of Life in Women After Pelvic Exenteration for Gynecological Malignancies: A Multicentric Study.妇科恶性肿瘤盆腔脏器切除术后女性的生活质量:一项多中心研究。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2018 Feb;28(2):267-273. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000612.
6
Post-traumatic reactions and quality of life after pelvic exenteration for gynecologic cancer: a retrospective cohort study.妇科癌症盆腔廓清术后的创伤后反应和生活质量:一项回顾性队列研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Oct 15;32(11):729. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08899-0.
7
Comparison of postoperative complications and quality of life between patients undergoing continent versus non-continent urinary diversion after pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies.比较妇科恶性肿瘤盆腔脏器切除术后行可控性与非可控性尿流改道术患者的术后并发症和生活质量。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Feb;30(2):233-240. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000863. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
8
Improvement in quality of life after robotic surgery results in patient satisfaction.机器人手术后生活质量的改善带来了患者满意度。
Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Sep;138(3):727-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.07.013. Epub 2015 Jul 18.
9
Quality of life after pelvic exenteration.盆腔脏器清除术后的生活质量。
Gynecol Oncol. 2004 Jun;93(3):610-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.03.008.
10
Vaginal reconstruction at the time of pelvic exenteration: a surgical and psychosexual analysis of techniques.盆腔脏器清除术同期阴道重建:技术的外科及性心理分析
Gynecol Oncol. 2002 Oct;87(1):39-45. doi: 10.1006/gyno.2002.6780.

引用本文的文献

1
A Retrospective Study of the Usefulness of Partial Cystectomy for Advanced Colorectal Cancer With Bladder Invasion.晚期结直肠癌侵犯膀胱行膀胱部分切除术疗效的回顾性研究
Cureus. 2025 May 31;17(5):e85130. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85130. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Double-Barrel Urocolostomy After Pelvic Exenteration: Short-Term Morbidity and Patient-Reported Quality of Life.盆腔脏器清除术后的双腔输尿管结肠造口术:短期发病率及患者报告的生活质量
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Jun;32(6):4534-4541. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17020-6. Epub 2025 Mar 14.
3
A Prospective Observational Cohort Study Comparing High-Complexity Against Conventional Pelvic Exenteration Surgery.一项比较高复杂性盆腔廓清术与传统盆腔廓清术的前瞻性观察性队列研究。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jan 1;17(1):111. doi: 10.3390/cancers17010111.
4
Mobile App for Gynecologic Cancer Support for Patients With Gynecologic Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy in China: Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.中国接受化疗的妇科癌症患者的妇科癌症支持移动应用:多中心随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 13;25:e49939. doi: 10.2196/49939.
5
Age-related differences in the occurrence, severity, and distress of symptoms in older patients at the initiation of chemotherapy.老年患者化疗起始时症状的发生、严重程度和困扰的年龄相关差异。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Aug 9;23(1):481. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04198-1.
6
Depression after stoma surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.造口手术后的抑郁:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 May 22;23(1):352. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04871-0.
7
Feasibility and Prediction of Adverse Events in a Postoperative Monitoring Program of Patient-Reported Outcomes and a Wearable Device Among Gynecologic Oncology Patients.妇科肿瘤患者术后患者报告结局及可穿戴设备监测项目中不良事件的可行性与预测
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2022 Mar;6(1):e2100167. doi: 10.1200/CCI.21.00167.
8
Opportunities and Limitations of Pelvic Exenteration Surgery.盆腔脏器切除术的机遇与局限
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Dec 7;13(24):6162. doi: 10.3390/cancers13246162.
9
Patient-Reported Outcomes in Surgical Oncology: An Overview of Instruments and Scores.外科肿瘤学中的患者报告结局:工具和评分概述。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Jan;27(1):45-53. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07752-7. Epub 2019 Aug 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality of life and symptoms in long-term survivors of colorectal cancer: results from NSABP protocol LTS-01.结直肠癌长期幸存者的生活质量与症状:NSABP LTS-01方案的结果
J Cancer Surviv. 2017 Feb;11(1):111-118. doi: 10.1007/s11764-016-0567-y. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
2
Self-reported financial burden of cancer care and its effect on physical and mental health-related quality of life among US cancer survivors.美国癌症幸存者自我报告的癌症治疗经济负担及其对身心健康相关生活质量的影响。
Cancer. 2016 Apr 15;122(8):283-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29808. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
3
Systematic review of health-related quality of life in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration.盆腔廓清术患者健康相关生活质量的系统评价
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Aug;42(8):1132-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.01.007. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
4
The Paradox of Pelvic Exenteration: The Interaction of Clinical and Psychological Variables.盆腔脏器切除术的悖论:临床与心理变量的相互作用
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 Oct;25(8):1534-40. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000523.
5
Overall survival after pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancy.妇科恶性肿瘤盆腔廓清术后的总生存。
Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Sep;134(3):546-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.06.034. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
6
Quality of life and other patient-reported outcomes following exenteration for pelvic malignancy.盆腔恶性肿瘤根治性切除术治疗后的生活质量和其他患者报告的结果。
Br J Surg. 2014 Feb;101(3):277-87. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9392. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
7
Should pelvic exenteration for symptomatic relief in gynaecology malignancies be offered?对于妇科恶性肿瘤患者,为缓解症状而行盆腔廓清术是否合理?
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Mar;289(3):657-62. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-3023-5. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
8
A prospective study of quality of life in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration: interim results.盆腔廓清术患者生活质量的前瞻性研究:中期结果。
Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Feb;128(2):191-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.09.030. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
9
Total pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies.妇科恶性肿瘤的全盆腔脏器切除术
Int J Surg Oncol. 2012;2012:693535. doi: 10.1155/2012/693535. Epub 2012 Jun 10.
10
Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.研究电子数据采集(REDCap)——一种用于提供转化研究信息学支持的元数据驱动方法和工作流程。
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Sep 30.