Suppr超能文献

在等式中加入睡眠限制:对热环境下野外消防员工作表现和生理机能的影响。

Adding sleep restriction to the equation: impact on wildland firefighters' work performance and physiology in hot conditions.

机构信息

Appleton Institute, Central Queensland University, 44 Greenhill Road, Wayville, SA, 5034, Australia.

Bushfire Co-Operative Research Centre, East Melbourne, 3002, Australia.

出版信息

Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2018 Jul;91(5):601-611. doi: 10.1007/s00420-018-1304-9. Epub 2018 Apr 6.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To examine the effects of sleep restriction on firefighters' physical task performance, physical activity, and physiological and perceived exertion during simulated hot wildfire conditions.

METHODS

31 firefighters were randomly allocated to either the hot (n = 18, HOT; 33 °C, 8-h sleep opportunity) or hot and sleep restricted (n = 13, HOT + SR; 33 °C, 4-h sleep opportunity) condition. Intermittent, self-paced work circuits of six firefighting tasks were performed for 3 days. Firefighters self-reported ratings of perceived exertion. Heart rate, core temperature, and physical activity were measured continuously. Fluids were consumed ad libitum, and all food and fluids consumed were recorded. Urine volume and urine specific gravity (USG) were analysed and sleep was assessed using polysomnography (PSG).

RESULTS

There were no differences between the HOT and HOT + SR groups in firefighters' physical task performance, heart rate, core temperature, USG, or fluid intake. Ratings of perceived exertion were higher (p < 0.05) in the HOT + SR group for two of the six firefighting tasks. The HOT group spent approximately 7 min more undertaking moderate physical activity throughout the 2-h work circuits compared to the HOT + SR group.

CONCLUSION

Two nights of sleep restriction did not influence firefighters' physical task performance or physiological responses during 3 days of simulated wildfire suppression. Further research is needed to explore firefighters' pacing strategies during real wildfire suppression.

摘要

目的

研究睡眠限制对模拟高热野外火灾条件下消防员身体任务表现、身体活动、生理和感知用力的影响。

方法

31 名消防员随机分配到高热组(n=18,HOT;33°C,8 小时睡眠机会)或高热和睡眠限制组(n=13,HOT+SR;33°C,4 小时睡眠机会)。消防员进行了三天间歇性、自我调节的六个消防任务工作循环。消防员自我报告感知用力的等级。连续测量心率、核心体温和身体活动。自由摄入液体,记录所有摄入的食物和液体。分析尿液量和尿比重(USG),并使用多导睡眠图(PSG)评估睡眠。

结果

高热和高热+睡眠限制组消防员的身体任务表现、心率、核心体温、USG 或液体摄入没有差异。在 HOT+SR 组的两项消防任务中,感知用力的等级更高(p<0.05)。与 HOT+SR 组相比,HOT 组在 2 小时工作循环中进行适度身体活动的时间大约多了 7 分钟。

结论

两晚的睡眠限制并没有影响模拟野外火灾扑灭 3 天期间消防员的身体任务表现或生理反应。需要进一步研究来探索消防员在实际野外火灾扑灭中的步伐策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验