Amy Jean-Jacques, Rowlands Sam
a Faculty of Medicine & Pharmacy , Vrije Universiteit Brussel , Brussels , Belgium.
b Faculty of Health & Social Sciences , Bournemouth University , Bournemouth , UK.
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2018 Apr;23(2):121-129. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2018.1450973. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
In the late 19th century, eugenics, a pseudo-scientific doctrine based on an erroneous interpretation of the laws of heredity, swept across the industrialised world. Academics and other influential figures who promoted it convinced political stakeholders to enact laws authorising the sterilisation of people seen as 'social misfits'. The earliest sterilisation Act was enforced in Indiana, in 1907; most states in the USA followed suit and so did several countries, with dissimilar political regimes. The end of the Second World War saw the suspension of Nazi legislation in Germany, including that regulating coerced sterilisation. The year 1945 should have been the endpoint of these inhuman practices but, in the early post-war period, the existing sterilisation Acts were suspended solely in Germany and Austria. Only much later did certain countries concerned - not Japan so far - officially acknowledge the human rights violations committed, issue apologies and develop reparation schemes for the victims' benefit.
19世纪末,优生学这一基于对遗传规律错误解读的伪科学理论席卷了工业化世界。倡导优生学的学者及其他有影响力的人物说服了政治利益相关者颁布法律,授权对被视为“社会异类”的人进行绝育。最早的绝育法案于1907年在印第安纳州实施;美国的大多数州纷纷效仿,一些政治体制不同的国家也这么做了。第二次世界大战结束时,德国的纳粹立法被暂停,包括强制绝育的相关规定。1945年本应是这些不人道做法的终点,但在战后初期,现有的绝育法案仅在德国和奥地利被暂停。直到很久以后,一些相关国家——目前日本除外——才正式承认所犯下的侵犯人权行为,作出道歉,并制定赔偿计划以造福受害者。