• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

软件版本对口腔内扫描设备准确性的影响。

Effect of Software Version on the Accuracy of an Intraoral Scanning Device.

作者信息

Haddadi Yasser, Bahrami Golnosh, Isidor Flemming

出版信息

Int J Prosthodont. 2018 July/August;31(4):375–376. doi: 10.11607/ijp.5781. Epub 2018 Apr 6.

DOI:10.11607/ijp.5781
PMID:29624626
Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the impact of software version on the accuracy of an intraoral scanning device.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A master tooth was scanned with a high-precision optical scanner and then 10 times with a CEREC Omnicam scanner with software versions 4.4.0 and 4.4.4. Discrepancies were measured using quality control software.

RESULTS

Mean deviation for 4.4.0 was 36.2 ± 35 μm and for 4.4.4 was 20.7 ± 14.2 μm (P ≤ .001).

CONCLUSION

Software version has a significant impact on the accuracy of an intraoral scanner. It is important that researchers also publish the software version of scanners when publishing their findings.

摘要

目的

研究软件版本对口腔内扫描设备准确性的影响。

材料与方法

用高精度光学扫描仪扫描一颗标准牙齿，然后使用软件版本为4.4.0和4.4.4的CEREC Omnicam扫描仪对其进行10次扫描。使用质量控制软件测量差异。

结果

4.4.0版本的平均偏差为36.2±35μm，4.4.4版本的平均偏差为20.7±14.2μm（P≤.001）。

结论

软件版本对口腔内扫描仪的准确性有显著影响。研究人员在发表研究结果时公布扫描仪的软件版本很重要。

相似文献

1
Effect of Software Version on the Accuracy of an Intraoral Scanning Device.软件版本对口腔内扫描设备准确性的影响。
Int J Prosthodont. 2018 July/August;31(4):375–376. doi: 10.11607/ijp.5781. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
2
Accuracy of single-abutment digital cast obtained using intraoral and cast scanners.使用口内扫描仪和模型扫描仪获取的单基台数字模型的准确性。
J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Feb;117(2):253-259. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.07.021. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
3
Computer-aided analysis of digital dental impressions obtained from intraoral and extraoral scanners.计算机辅助分析从口内和口外扫描仪获得的数字牙印模。
J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Nov;118(5):617-623. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.11.018. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
4
[Comparative analysis of 3D data accuracy of single tooth and full dental arch captured by different intraoral and laboratory digital impression systems].不同口腔内及实验室数字印模系统采集的单颗牙齿和全牙弓三维数据准确性的比较分析
Stomatologiia (Mosk). 2016;95(4):65-70. doi: 10.17116/stomat201695465-70.
5
Accuracy of five intraoral scanners compared to indirect digitalization.与间接数字化相比，五种口腔内扫描仪的准确性。
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Jun;21(5):1445-1455. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1902-4. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
6
Accuracy of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing-generated dental casts based on intraoral scanner data.基于口内扫描仪数据的计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造生成的牙模的准确性。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2014 Nov;145(11):1133-40. doi: 10.14219/jada.2014.87.
7
Evaluation of the Precision of Different Intraoral Scanner-Computer Aided Design (CAD) Software Combinations in Digital Dentistry.不同口内扫描仪-计算机辅助设计（CAD）软件组合在数字化牙科中的精度评估。
Med Sci Monit. 2020 Jan 3;26:e918529. doi: 10.12659/MSM.918529.
8
Intraoral Scanning Systems: Need for Maintenance.口腔内扫描系统：维护需求。
Int J Prosthodont. 2017 Jan/Feb;30(1):27-29. doi: 10.11607/ijp.4976.
9
Complete-arch accuracy of intraoral scanners.口内扫描仪的全牙弓精度。
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Sep;120(3):382-388. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.01.005. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
10
Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: An in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons.评估 7 种数字扫描仪的准确性：基于三维比较的体外分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Jul;118(1):36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.09.024. Epub 2016 Dec 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing Intraoral Scanning Accuracy: From the Influencing Factors to a Procedural Guideline.提高口内扫描准确性：从影响因素到操作指南
J Clin Med. 2025 May 20;14(10):3562. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103562.
2
Evaluation of Marginal Fit of CAD/CAM Ceramic Crowns and Scanning Time Using Different Intraoral Scanning Systems.使用不同口腔内扫描系统评估CAD/CAM全瓷冠的边缘适合性及扫描时间
J Funct Biomater. 2024 Nov 26;15(12):359. doi: 10.3390/jfb15120359.
3
Long-term Survival Rate and Clinical Quality of Individually Layered Indirect Composite Restorations in Adolescents and Young Adults.
青少年和年轻成人中分层间接复合树脂修复体的长期存活率和临床质量。
J Adhes Dent. 2024 Nov 13;26:263-274. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.b5825410.
4
Effect of scanning strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanners: a meta-analysis of studies.扫描策略对数字口内扫描仪准确性的影响：一项研究的荟萃分析
J Adv Prosthodont. 2023 Dec;15(6):315-332. doi: 10.4047/jap.2023.15.6.315. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
5
A Comprehensive Review of Factors That Influence the Accuracy of Intraoral Scanners.影响口腔内扫描仪准确性的因素综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Oct 24;13(21):3291. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13213291.
6
The effect of generation change on the accuracy of full arch digital impressions.世代交替对全口数字印模准确性的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Oct 18;23(1):766. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03476-z.
7
Comparison of 3D accuracy of three different digital intraoral scanners in full-arch implant impressions.三种不同数字口腔内扫描仪在全牙弓种植体印模中的三维精度比较。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2023 Aug;15(4):179-188. doi: 10.4047/jap.2023.15.4.179. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
8
Fibre-reinforced Cad/CAM post and cores: The new "gold standard" for anterior teeth with extensive coronal destruction?-A fully digital chairside workflow.纤维增强型计算机辅助设计与制造桩核：广泛冠部破坏的前牙的新“金标准”？——一种完全数字化的椅旁工作流程。
Heliyon. 2023 Aug 9;9(8):e19048. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19048. eCollection 2023 Aug.
9
Comparison of the learning curve of intraoral scanning with two different intraoral scanners based on scanning time.基于扫描时间的两种不同口内扫描仪的学习曲线比较。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 May 9;23(1):267. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02963-7.
10
The Effect of Scanning Strategy on Intraoral Scanner's Accuracy.扫描策略对口腔内扫描仪准确性的影响。
Dent J (Basel). 2022 Jul 4;10(7):123. doi: 10.3390/dj10070123.