Mirra Alessandro, von Rotz Alois, Schmidhalter Marta, Moser Lara, Casoni Daniela, Spadavecchia Claudia
Division of Anaesthesiology and Pain Therapy, Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Division of Veterinary Anatomy, Department of Clinical Research and Veterinary Public Health, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Vet Anaesth Analg. 2018 May;45(3):384-391. doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2018.02.001. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
To describe and assess the ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block feasibility in calf cadavers, to compare two injection volumes and to evaluate possible undesired solution spreads.
Prospective, descriptive, anatomic study.
A group of 15 bovine cadavers weighing 47±11 kg (mean±standard deviation).
Lateral (n = 24) and subcostal (n = 12) TAP block approaches were assessed. For each approach, two volumes (0.2 or 0.4 mL kg) of toluidine blue and contrast medium were injected using both sides of the animals. Nerve staining was assessed by anatomical dissection and spread of injectate by contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Objective and subjective technique feasibility was evaluated by a specific score (poor, good, excellent).
Using the lateral approach, 58%, 92% and 25% and 75%, 83% and 25% of the thirteenth thoracic, first and second lumbar nerves were stained by 0.2 and 0.4 mL kg, respectively. Craniocaudal and dorsoventral solution spread and number of blocks that adequately stained an individual nerve were not significantly different between the volumes. Using the subcostal approach, 67%, 83%, 67%, 67% and 50%, and 83%, 100%, 83%, 83% and 50% of the eighth, ninth, tenth, eleventh, twelfth thoracic nerves were stained by 0.2 and 0.4 mL kg, respectively. With both techniques, no intraspinal and one intraperitoneal spread were observed. Objective and subjective feasibility score was excellent for both approaches in the majority of the cases.
TAP injections were easy to perform with both techniques in calf cadavers. The volume of injectate did not influence spread. The authors conclude that a combination of the two approaches is necessary, but perhaps not sufficient, to stain all of the nerves innervating the ventral abdominal wall. Further studies are required to refine the technique and evaluate its efficacy in preventing nociception in calves.
描述并评估超声引导下在小牛尸体中进行腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞的可行性,比较两种注射容量,并评估可能出现的不期望的溶液扩散情况。
前瞻性、描述性解剖学研究。
一组15头体重为47±11千克(均值±标准差)的牛尸体。
评估外侧(n = 24)和肋下(n = 12)TAP阻滞方法。对于每种方法,在动物两侧使用两种容量(0.2或0.4毫升/千克)的甲苯胺蓝和造影剂进行注射。通过解剖评估神经染色情况,并通过增强CT评估注射剂的扩散情况。通过特定评分(差、好、优)评估客观和主观技术可行性。
采用外侧入路时,0.2毫升/千克和0.4毫升/千克分别使第13胸神经、第1腰神经和第2腰神经染色的比例为58%、92%和25%以及75%、83%和25%。两种容量之间,头侧尾侧和背腹侧溶液扩散情况以及能充分染色单根神经的阻滞次数无显著差异。采用肋下入路时,0.2毫升/千克和0.4毫升/千克分别使第8、9、10、11、12胸神经染色的比例为67%、83%、67%、67%和50%以及83%、100%、83%、83%和50%。两种技术均未观察到椎管内和1例腹腔内扩散。在大多数情况下,两种入路的客观和主观可行性评分均为优。
在小牛尸体中,两种技术进行TAP注射均易于操作。注射剂容量不影响扩散。作者得出结论,两种入路联合使用对于染色支配腹前壁的所有神经而言是必要的,但可能并不充分。需要进一步研究以完善该技术并评估其在预防小牛疼痛感受方面的疗效。