Suppr超能文献

格拉斯哥-布拉奇福德评分和急性上消化道出血的风险分层:我们能否将其扩展到 2 级以进行紧急门诊管理?

Glasgow Blatchford Score and risk stratifications in acute upper gastrointestinal bleed: can we extend this to 2 for urgent outpatient management?

机构信息

Salford Royal Foundation Trust, Salford, UK.

Salford Royal Foundation Trust, Salford, UK

出版信息

Clin Med (Lond). 2018 Mar;18(2):118-122. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.18-2-118.

Abstract

Upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeds are a common presentation to emergency departments in the UK. The Glasgow Blatchford score (GBS) predicts the outcome of patients at presentation. Current UK and European guidelines recommend outpatient management for a GBS of 0. In the current study, our aim was to assess whether extending the GBS allows for early discharge while maintaining patient safety. We also analysed whether pathologies could be missed by discharging patients too early. Data were retrospectively collected on patients admitted with symptoms of an upper GI bleed between 1 October 2013 and 10 June 2016. The GBS was calculated and gastroscopy reports were obtained for each patient. In total, 399 patients were identified, 63 of whom required therapy. The negative predictive value (NPV) for excluding the need for endoscopic intervention with a GBS score up to 1 was 100%. Extending the score to 2 and 3 reduced the NPV to 98.53% and 98.77%, respectively. The NPV of GBS in excluding any diagnosis at 0 was 43.55%. Two patients died as a result of GI bleeding, with a GBS score of 3. Therefore, we can conclude that, for non-variceal bleeds, the GBS can be extended to 2 for safe outpatient management, thereby reducing the number of bed days and pressure for urgent endoscopies.

摘要

上消化道 (GI) 出血是英国急诊科常见的就诊原因。格拉斯哥 Blatchford 评分 (GBS) 可预测患者就诊时的预后。目前英国和欧洲的指南建议对 GBS 评分为 0 的患者进行门诊治疗。在本研究中,我们旨在评估是否可以通过扩展 GBS 评分来实现早期出院,同时保持患者安全。我们还分析了过早出院是否会遗漏患者的病理情况。我们回顾性地收集了 2013 年 10 月 1 日至 2016 年 6 月 10 日期间因上消化道出血症状入院的患者数据。计算了每位患者的 GBS 评分,并获取了胃镜报告。共确定了 399 例患者,其中 63 例需要治疗。GBS 评分最高为 1 时,排除内镜干预需求的阴性预测值 (NPV) 为 100%。将评分扩展至 2 和 3 时,NPV 分别降至 98.53%和 98.77%。GBS 评分为 0 时,排除任何诊断的 NPV 为 43.55%。两名患者因 GBS 评分为 3 的 GI 出血而死亡。因此,我们可以得出结论,对于非静脉曲张性出血,GBS 评分可以扩展至 2 分以进行安全的门诊治疗,从而减少住院天数和紧急内镜检查的压力。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

8
Turn over the new leaf of the treatment in peptic ulcer bleeding: a review of the literature.翻开消化性溃疡出血治疗的新篇章:文献综述
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2024 Sep 8;17:17562848241275318. doi: 10.1177/17562848241275318. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验