• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

圣文森特和格林纳丁斯三一医学院临床前医学生学习方法的分布及其学术意义

Distribution and academic significance of learning approaches among pre-clinical medical students at Trinity School of Medicine, St Vincent and the Grenadines.

作者信息

Paudel Keshab Raj, Nepal Hari Prasad, Shrestha Binu, Panta Raju, Toth Stephen

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacology, Trinity School of Medicine, Ribishi, Rathomill, St. Vincent and the Grenadines.

Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Microbiology, Trinity School of Medicine, Ribishi, Rathomill, St. Vincent and the Grenadines.

出版信息

J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2018 Apr 6;15:9. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2018.15.9. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.3352/jeehp.2018.15.9
PMID:29627969
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5968219/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Different students may adopt different learning approaches: namely, deep and surface. This study aimed to characterize the learning strategies of medical students at Trinity School of Medicine and to explore potential correlations between deep learning approach and the students' academic scores.

METHODS

The study was a questionnaire-based, cross-sectional, observational study. A total of 169 medical students in the basic science years of training were included in the study after giving informed consent. The Biggs's Revised Two-Factor Study Process Questionnaire in paper form was distributed to subjects from January to November 2017. For statistical analyses, the Student t-test, 1-way analysis of variance followed by the post-hoc t-test, and the Pearson correlation test were used. The Cronbach alpha was used to test the internal consistency of the questionnaire.

RESULTS

Of the 169 subjects, 132 (response rate, 78.1%) completely filled out the questionnaires. The Cronbach alpha value for the items on the questionnaire was 0.8. The score for the deep learning approach was 29.4± 4.6, whereas the score for the surface approach was 24.3± 4.2, which was a significant difference (P< 0.05). A positive correlation was found between the deep learning approach and students' academic performance (r= 0.197, P< 0.05, df= 130).

CONCLUSION

Medical students in the basic science years at Trinity School of Medicine adopted the deep learning approach more than the surface approach. Likewise, students who were more inclined towards the deep learning approach scored significantly higher on academic tests.

摘要

目的

不同的学生可能会采用不同的学习方法,即深度学习法和表面学习法。本研究旨在描述三一医学院医学生的学习策略,并探讨深度学习方法与学生学业成绩之间的潜在相关性。

方法

本研究是一项基于问卷调查的横断面观察性研究。在获得知情同意后,共有169名处于基础科学培训阶段的医学生被纳入研究。2017年1月至11月,向受试者发放了纸质版的比格斯修订的两因素学习过程问卷。统计分析采用学生t检验、单因素方差分析及事后t检验,以及Pearson相关检验。采用Cronbach α系数检验问卷的内部一致性。

结果

169名受试者中,132名(回复率78.1%)完整填写了问卷。问卷项目的Cronbach α值为0.8。深度学习方法的得分为29.4±4.6,而表面学习方法的得分为24.3±4.2,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。深度学习方法与学生学业成绩之间存在正相关(r=0.197,P<0.05,自由度=130)。

结论

三一医学院基础科学阶段的医学生采用深度学习方法的多于表面学习方法。同样,更倾向于深度学习方法的学生在学业测试中的得分显著更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbd2/5968219/c64e658eec37/jeehp-15-09f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbd2/5968219/c64e658eec37/jeehp-15-09f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbd2/5968219/c64e658eec37/jeehp-15-09f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Distribution and academic significance of learning approaches among pre-clinical medical students at Trinity School of Medicine, St Vincent and the Grenadines.圣文森特和格林纳丁斯三一医学院临床前医学生学习方法的分布及其学术意义
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2018 Apr 6;15:9. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2018.15.9. eCollection 2018.
2
Assessing Saudi medical students learning approach using the revised two-factor study process questionnaire.使用修订后的双因素学习过程问卷评估沙特医学生的学习方法。
Int J Med Educ. 2017 Aug 17;8:292-296. doi: 10.5116/ijme.5974.7a06.
3
Patterns of Change in Approaches to Learning and Their Impact on Academic Performance Among Medical Students: Longitudinal Analysis.医学生学习方法的变化模式及其对学业成绩的影响:纵向分析
Teach Learn Med. 2021 Apr-May;33(2):173-183. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2020.1814295. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
4
Observations of veterinary medicine students' approaches to study in pre-clinical years.对兽医学专业学生临床前几年学习方法的观察。
J Vet Med Educ. 2004 Fall;31(3):242-54. doi: 10.3138/jvme.31.3.242.
5
Superficial and deep learning approaches among medical students in an interdisciplinary integrated curriculum.跨学科综合课程中,医学生的浅层和深度学习方法。
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2014 Jan-Apr;27(1):10-4. doi: 10.4103/1357-6283.134293.
6
Exploring the relationships between epistemic beliefs about medicine and approaches to learning medicine: a structural equation modeling analysis.探索关于医学的认知信念与医学学习方法之间的关系:一项结构方程模型分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Jul 18;16:181. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0707-0.
7
First year medical students' learning style preferences and their correlation with performance in different subjects within the medical course.医学专业一年级学生的学习风格偏好及其与医学课程不同科目成绩的相关性。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Aug 8;17(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0965-5.
8
Measuring students' perceptions of the educational climate of the new curriculum at the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile: performance of the Spanish translation of the Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM).评估智利天主教大学学生对新课程教育氛围的看法:邓迪预备教育环境量表(DREEM)西班牙语翻译的表现。
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2009 May;22(1):112. Epub 2009 Apr 29.
9
Teaching neuroanatomy using computer-aided learning: What makes for successful outcomes?运用计算机辅助学习教授神经解剖学:哪些因素决定了成功的结果?
Anat Sci Educ. 2017 Nov;10(6):560-569. doi: 10.1002/ase.1694. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
10
Learning and study strategies correlate with medical students' performance in anatomical sciences.学习和研究策略与医学生在解剖科学中的表现相关。
Anat Sci Educ. 2018 May 6;11(3):236-242. doi: 10.1002/ase.1742. Epub 2017 Sep 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and Preliminary Validation of the Physical Education-Study Process Questionnaire : Insights for Physical Education University Students.《体育-学习过程问卷的编制与初步验证:对体育专业大学生的启示》。
Front Public Health. 2022 Mar 17;10:856167. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.856167. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
The perceived stress and approach to learning effects on academic performance among Sudanese medical students.苏丹医学生的感知压力及学习方式对学业成绩的影响
Electron Physician. 2017 Apr 25;9(4):4072-4076. doi: 10.19082/4072. eCollection 2017 Apr.
2
Learning approach among health sciences students in a medical college in Nepal: a cross-sectional study.尼泊尔一所医学院校健康科学专业学生的学习方法:一项横断面研究。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2016 Mar 4;7:137-43. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S100968. eCollection 2016.
3
Graduate entry and undergraduate medical students' study approaches, stress levels and ways of coping: a five year longitudinal study.
研究生入学医学生和本科医学生的学习方法、压力水平及应对方式:一项为期五年的纵向研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2015 Jan 24;15:5. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0284-7.
4
Approaches to study in undergraduate nursing students in regional Victoria, Australia.澳大利亚维多利亚州地区本科护理专业学生的学习方法。
Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2014 Nov 8;11:/j/ijnes.2014.11.issue-1/ijnes-2014-0020/ijnes-2014-0020.xml. doi: 10.1515/ijnes-2014-0020.
5
Superficial and deep learning approaches among medical students in an interdisciplinary integrated curriculum.跨学科综合课程中,医学生的浅层和深度学习方法。
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2014 Jan-Apr;27(1):10-4. doi: 10.4103/1357-6283.134293.
6
Does medical training promote or deter self-directed learning? A longitudinal mixed-methods study.医学培训促进还是阻碍自我导向学习?一项纵向混合方法研究。
Acad Med. 2013 Nov;88(11):1754-64. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182a9262d.
7
Learning styles and approaches to learning among medical undergraduates and postgraduates.医学生和研究生的学习风格和学习方法。
BMC Med Educ. 2013 Mar 25;13:42. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-42.
8
The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F.修订后的双因素学习过程问卷:R-SPQ-2F。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2001 Mar;71(Pt 1):133-49. doi: 10.1348/000709901158433.