Suppr超能文献

在超声心动图中使用新的16节段壁运动评分评估左心室射血分数。

Assessment of LVEF using a new 16-segment wall motion score in echocardiography.

作者信息

Lebeau Real, Serri Karim, Lorenzo Maria Di, Sauvé Claude, Le Van Hoai Viet, Soulières Vicky, El-Rayes Malak, Pagé Maude, Zaïani Chimène, Garot Jérôme, Poulin Frédéric

机构信息

Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.

Institut cardiovasculaire Paris Sud, Massy, France.

出版信息

Echo Res Pract. 2018 Jun;5(2):63-69. doi: 10.1530/ERP-18-0006. Epub 2018 Mar 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Simpson biplane method and 3D by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), radionuclide angiography (RNA) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) are the most accepted techniques for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) assessment. Wall motion score index (WMSI) by TTE is an accepted complement. However, the conversion from WMSI to LVEF is obtained through a regression equation, which may limit its use. In this retrospective study, we aimed to validate a new method to derive LVEF from the wall motion score in 95 patients.

METHODS

The new score consisted of attributing a segmental EF to each LV segment based on the wall motion score and averaging all 16 segmental EF into a global LVEF. This segmental EF score was calculated on TTE in 95 patients, and RNA was used as the reference LVEF method. LVEF using the new segmental EF 15-40-65 score on TTE was compared to the reference methods using linear regression and Bland-Altman analyses.

RESULTS

The median LVEF was 45% (interquartile range 32-53%; range from 15 to 65%). Our new segmental EF 15-40-65 score derived on TTE correlated strongly with RNA-LVEF ( = 0.97). Overall, the new score resulted in good agreement of LVEF compared to RNA (mean bias 0.61%). The standard deviations (s.d.s) of the distributions of inter-method difference for the comparison of the new score with RNA were 6.2%, indicating good precision.

CONCLUSION

LVEF assessment using segmental EF derived from the wall motion score applied to each of the 16 LV segments has excellent correlation and agreement with a reference method.

摘要

背景

辛普森双平面法以及经胸超声心动图(TTE)、放射性核素血管造影(RNA)和心脏磁共振成像(CMR)三维成像技术是评估左心室射血分数(LVEF)最常用的方法。TTE测定的壁运动评分指数(WMSI)是一种公认的补充方法。然而,WMSI向LVEF的转换是通过回归方程实现的,这可能会限制其应用。在这项回顾性研究中,我们旨在验证一种从95例患者的壁运动评分中得出LVEF的新方法。

方法

新评分方法是基于壁运动评分给每个左心室节段赋予一个节段射血分数,并将所有16个节段射血分数平均得到一个整体LVEF。在95例患者中通过TTE计算该节段射血分数评分,并将RNA作为LVEF的参考方法。使用TTE上的新节段射血分数15 - 40 - 65评分得出的LVEF与参考方法进行线性回归和布兰德 - 奥特曼分析比较。

结果

LVEF中位数为45%(四分位间距32% - 53%;范围为15%至65%)。我们通过TTE得出的新节段射血分数15 - 40 - 65评分与RNA - LVEF密切相关(r = 0.97)。总体而言,与RNA相比,新评分得出的LVEF一致性良好(平均偏差0.61%)。新评分与RNA比较的方法间差异分布的标准差(s.d.s)为6.2%,表明精度良好。

结论

将壁运动评分应用于16个左心室节段得出的节段射血分数评估LVEF,与参考方法具有极好的相关性和一致性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bda7/5887066/232edd302cda/erp-5-63-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验