Suppr超能文献

用于非心脏病专家的基于中胸骨旁短轴和心尖四腔视图的简化节段运动评分的左心室射血分数。

Left ventricular ejection fraction using a simplified wall motion score based on mid-parasternal short axis and apical four-chamber views for non-cardiologists.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, 5400 Gouin Blvd W., Montreal, QC, H4J 1C5, Canada.

Centre de Rercherche de l'Hôpital Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023 Mar 8;23(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12872-023-03141-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a need for a convenient, yet reliable method to assess left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) with point-of-care ultrasound study (POCUS). We aim to validate a novel and simplified wall motion score LVEF based on the analysis of a simplified combination of echocardiographic views.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, transthoracic echocardiograms of randomly selected patients were analysed by the standard 16-segments wall motion score index (WMSI) to derive the reference semi-quantitative LVEF. To develop our semi-quantitative simplified-views method, a limited combination of imaging views and only 4 segments per view were tested: (1) A combination of the three parasternal short-axis views (PSAX BASE, MID-, APEX); (2) A combination of the three apical views (apical 2-chamber, 3-chamber and 4-chamber) and (3) A more limited combination of PSAX-MID and apical 4-chamber is called the MID-4CH. Global LVEF is obtained by averaging segmental EF based on contractility (normal = 60%, hypokinesia = 40%, and akinesia = 10%). Accuracy of the novel semi-quantitative simplified-views WMS method compared to the reference WMSI was evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis and correlation was assessed in both emergency physicians and cardiologists.

RESULTS

In the 46 patients using the 16 segments WMSI method, the mean LVEF was 34 ± 10%. Among the three combinations of the two or three imaging views analysed, the MID-4CH had the best correlation with the reference method (r = 0.90) with very good agreement (mean LVEF bias = - 0.2%) and precision (± 3.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiac POCUS by emergency physicians and other non-cardiologists is a decisive therapeutic and prognostic tool. A simplified semi-quantitative WMS method to assess LVEF using the easiest technically achievable combination of mid-parasternal and apical four-chamber views provides a good approximative estimate for both non-cardiologist emergency physicians and cardiologists.

摘要

背景

需要一种方便且可靠的方法,通过即时护理超声检查(POCUS)来评估左心室射血分数(LVEF)。我们旨在验证一种新的简化壁运动评分 LVEF,该方法基于对简化的超声心动图视图组合的分析。

方法

在这项回顾性研究中,通过标准的 16 节段壁运动评分指数(WMSI)对随机选择的患者的经胸超声心动图进行分析,以得出参考半定量 LVEF。为了开发我们的半定量简化视图方法,我们测试了仅 4 个节段/视图的有限成像视图组合:(1)三个胸骨旁短轴视图(PSAX BASE、MID、APEX)的组合;(2)三个心尖视图(心尖 2 腔、3 腔和 4 腔)的组合和(3)称为 MID-4CH 的 PSAX-MID 和心尖 4 腔的更有限组合。通过基于收缩性的节段 EF 的平均值获得整体 LVEF(正常=60%,运动低下=40%,无运动=10%)。使用 Bland-Altman 分析评估新型半定量简化视图 WMS 方法与参考 WMSI 的准确性,并在急诊医师和心脏病专家中评估相关性。

结果

在使用 16 节段 WMSI 方法的 46 名患者中,平均 LVEF 为 34±10%。在分析的两种或三种成像视图的三种组合中,MID-4CH 与参考方法相关性最好(r=0.90),具有很好的一致性(平均 LVEF 偏差=−0.2%)和精度(±3.3%)。

结论

急诊医师和其他非心脏病专家的心脏 POCUS 是一种决定性的治疗和预后工具。使用最容易获得的中胸骨旁和心尖四腔视图的简化半定量 WMS 方法评估 LVEF,可以为非心脏病专家的急诊医师和心脏病专家提供良好的近似估计。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a413/9993504/496f559b358d/12872_2023_3141_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验