Mielczarek Marzena, Norena Arnaud, Schlee Winfried, Olszewski Jurek
Department of Otolaryngology, Laryngological Oncology, Audiology and Phoniatrics, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.
Laboratoire Neurosciences Intégratives et Adaptatives, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France.
Front Neurosci. 2018 Mar 23;12:146. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00146. eCollection 2018.
One of possible approach that may suppress tinnitus is electrical stimulation of the ear. At first invasive techniques were used (promontory or round window stimulation), nowadays a non-invasive method, namely hydrotransmissive electric stimulation (ES) through external acoustic canal, has been developed. The aim of the study is to investigate the effect of applying ES with positive and negative current polarities on the ears of healthy subjects and on the tinnitus ears of patients with tinnitus. This comparison further clarifies the mechanisms of operation of non-invasive extra-cochlear ear ES. A second aim is to assess the effects of ES on tinnitus in tinnitus patients. The material was composed of two groups: tinnitus group-49 patients suffering from tinnitus, and healthy students group-34 healthy individuals. ES was performed with the use of a custom-made apparatus. The active, silver probe-was immersed inside saline filling external ear canal. The passive electrode was placed on the forehead. Positive and next negative DC stimulation was provided with the use following frequencies: 0.25, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 kHz. We checked for the presence of the auditory percept (AP) and, if AP was present, the minimum current amplitude necessary to produce AP was measured. In our research both positive and negative polarities were efficient to evoke AP in the participants. This effect, however, was more pronounced for positive polarity in no tinnitus and normal hearing individuals (healthy students group). In the tinnitus group, current intensity needed to evoke AP was higher than in the healthy students group. However, comparing normal hearing vs. hearing loss patients within the tinnitus group, we did not observe the relationship between hearing threshold and current intensity evoking AP. Afterwards, we analyzed the effect of multi-frequency ES on tinnitus. It appeared to be effective in 75% of tinnitus ears (with a high score of disappearance-22%). Our study proved that extracochlear ES with positive and negative current was efficient to stimulate the auditory system. Stimulating tinnitus ears with two polarities we obtained a higher ratio of improvement (75%) comparing to positive stimulations.
一种可能抑制耳鸣的方法是对耳朵进行电刺激。起初使用的是侵入性技术(鼓岬或圆窗刺激),如今已开发出一种非侵入性方法,即通过外耳道进行水传导电刺激(ES)。本研究的目的是探讨施加正负极性电流的ES对健康受试者耳朵以及耳鸣患者耳鸣耳朵的影响。这种比较进一步阐明了非侵入性耳蜗外耳ES的作用机制。第二个目的是评估ES对耳鸣患者耳鸣的影响。材料由两组组成:耳鸣组——49名患有耳鸣的患者,以及健康学生组——34名健康个体。使用定制设备进行ES。有源银探头浸入填充外耳道的盐水中。无源电极置于前额。使用以下频率提供正负极直流刺激:0.25、1、2、³、4、5、6、7、8千赫。我们检查是否存在听觉感知(AP),如果存在AP,则测量产生AP所需的最小电流幅度。在我们的研究中,正负极性都能有效诱发参与者的AP。然而,在无耳鸣和听力正常的个体(健康学生组)中,这种效应在正极性时更为明显。在耳鸣组中,诱发AP所需的电流强度高于健康学生组。然而,在耳鸣组中比较听力正常与听力损失患者时,我们未观察到听力阈值与诱发AP的电流强度之间的关系。之后,我们分析了多频ES对耳鸣的影响。结果显示,75%的耳鸣耳朵有效(高消失率为22%)。我们的研究证明,正负极性电流的耳蜗外ES能有效刺激听觉系统。与正极性刺激相比,用两种极性刺激耳鸣耳朵获得了更高的改善率(75%)。