Lim Eunsoo, Hyun Sunah, Lee Jae Myeong, Kim Seirhan, Lee Min-Jeong, Lee Sun-Mi, Oh Ye-Sung, Park Inwhee, Shin Gyu-Tae, Kim Heungsoo, Morisky Donald E, Jeong Jong Cheol
Department of Nephrology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
Department of Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
Kidney Res Clin Pract. 2018 Mar;37(1):69-76. doi: 10.23876/j.krcp.2018.37.1.69. Epub 2018 Mar 31.
For phosphate control, patient education is essential due to the limited clearance of phosphate by dialysis. However, well-designed randomized controlled trials about dietary and phosphate binder education have been scarce.
We enrolled maintenance hemodialysis patients and randomized them into an education group (n = 48) or a control group (n = 22). We assessed the patients' drug compliance and their knowledge about the phosphate binder using a questionnaire.
The primary goal was to increase the number of patients who reached a calcium-phosphorus product of lower than 55. In the education group, 36 (75.0%) patients achieved the primary goal, as compared with 16 (72.7%) in the control group ( = 0.430). The education increased the proportion of patients who properly took the phosphate binder (22.9% vs. 3.5%, = 0.087), but not to statistical significance. Education did not affect the amount of dietary phosphate intake per body weight (education vs. control: -1.18 ± 3.54 vs. -0.88 ± 2.04 mg/kg, = 0.851). However, the dietary phosphate-to-protein ratio tended to be lower in the education group (-0.64 ± 2.04 vs. 0.65 ± 3.55, = 0.193). The education on phosphate restriction affected neither the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment score (0.17 ± 4.58 vs. -0.86 ± 3.86, = 0.363) nor the level of dietary protein intake (-0.03 ± 0.33 vs. -0.09 ± 0.18, = 0.569).
Education did not affect the calcium-phosphate product. Education on the proper timing of phosphate binder intake and the dietary phosphate-to-protein ratio showed marginal efficacy.
对于磷酸盐控制而言,由于透析对磷酸盐的清除有限,患者教育至关重要。然而,关于饮食和磷酸盐结合剂教育的精心设计的随机对照试验却很稀缺。
我们招募了维持性血液透析患者,并将他们随机分为教育组(n = 48)或对照组(n = 22)。我们使用问卷评估患者的药物依从性以及他们对磷酸盐结合剂的了解情况。
主要目标是增加钙磷乘积低于55的患者数量。在教育组中,36名(75.0%)患者达到了主要目标,而对照组为16名(72.7%)(P = 0.430)。教育提高了正确服用磷酸盐结合剂的患者比例(22.9%对3.5%,P = 0.087),但未达到统计学显著性。教育并未影响每体重的饮食磷酸盐摄入量(教育组对对照组:-1.18±3.54对-0.88±2.04mg/kg,P = 0.851)。然而,教育组的饮食磷蛋白比趋于更低(-0.64±2.04对0.65±3.55,P = 0.193)。磷酸盐限制教育既未影响患者自评主观全面评定分数(0.17±4.58对-0.86±3.86,P = 0.363),也未影响饮食蛋白质摄入量水平(-0.03±0.33对-0.09±0.18,P = 0.569)。
教育并未影响钙磷乘积。关于磷酸盐结合剂摄入的正确时间以及饮食磷蛋白比的教育显示出边际疗效。