• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与手持显示器(基于纸质系统和智能手机)相比,通过头戴式显示器(“智能眼镜”)呈现信息对双任务步行时步态变异性的时间结构的影响较小。

Information presentation through a head-worn display ("smart glasses") has a smaller influence on the temporal structure of gait variability during dual-task gait compared to handheld displays (paper-based system and smartphone).

机构信息

Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, United States of America.

School of Biomedical Engineering and Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Apr 9;13(4):e0195106. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195106. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0195106
PMID:29630614
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5891005/
Abstract

The need to complete multiple tasks concurrently is a common occurrence both daily life and in occupational activities, which can often include simultaneous cognitive and physical demands. As one example, there is increasing availability of head-worn display technologies that can be employed when a user is mobile (e.g., while walking). This new method of information presentation may, however, introduce risks of adverse outcomes such as a decrement to gait performance. The goal of this study was thus to quantify the effects of a head-worn display (i.e., smart glasses) on motor variability during gait and to compare these effects with those of other common information displays (i.e., smartphone and paper-based system). Twenty participants completed four walking conditions, as a single task and in three dual-task conditions (three information displays). In the dual-task conditions, the information display was used to present several cognitive tasks. Three different measures were used to quantify variability in gait parameters for each walking condition (using the cycle-to-cycle standard deviation, sample entropy, and the "goal-equivalent manifold" approach). Our results indicated that participants used less adaptable gait strategies in dual-task walking using the paper-based system and smartphone conditions compared with single-task walking. Gait performance, however, was less affected during dual-task walking with the smart glasses. We conclude that the risk of an adverse gait event (e.g., a fall) in head-down walking conditions (i.e., the paper-based system and smartphone conditions) were higher than in single-task walking, and that head-worn displays might help reduce the risk of such events during dual-task gait conditions.

摘要

同时完成多项任务是日常生活和职业活动中的常见现象,这些任务通常同时包括认知和身体需求。例如,越来越多的头戴式显示技术可在用户移动时使用(例如,行走时)。这种新的信息呈现方式可能会带来不良后果的风险,例如步态性能下降。因此,本研究的目的是量化头戴式显示器(即智能眼镜)对步态运动变异性的影响,并将这些影响与其他常见信息显示器(即智能手机和基于纸张的系统)进行比较。二十名参与者完成了四项行走条件,即单一任务和三种双任务条件(三种信息显示器)。在双任务条件下,信息显示器用于呈现几个认知任务。使用三种不同的测量方法来量化每个行走条件下步态参数的变异性(使用周期到周期标准差、样本熵和“目标等效流形”方法)。我们的结果表明,与单一任务行走相比,参与者在使用基于纸张的系统和智能手机条件下进行双任务行走时使用的适应性步态策略较少。然而,在使用智能眼镜进行双任务行走时,步态性能受影响较小。我们得出的结论是,在低头行走条件下(即基于纸张的系统和智能手机条件)发生不良步态事件(例如跌倒)的风险高于单一任务行走,而头戴式显示器可能有助于降低双任务行走条件下发生此类事件的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f8e/5891005/cdccec1f7da8/pone.0195106.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f8e/5891005/ec2708c5748a/pone.0195106.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f8e/5891005/7ff272e721de/pone.0195106.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f8e/5891005/072bed13f7d0/pone.0195106.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f8e/5891005/320217a74390/pone.0195106.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f8e/5891005/a750d4d926b4/pone.0195106.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f8e/5891005/ab8a6936bb4d/pone.0195106.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f8e/5891005/7f659a6f2705/pone.0195106.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f8e/5891005/cdccec1f7da8/pone.0195106.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f8e/5891005/ec2708c5748a/pone.0195106.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f8e/5891005/7ff272e721de/pone.0195106.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f8e/5891005/072bed13f7d0/pone.0195106.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f8e/5891005/320217a74390/pone.0195106.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f8e/5891005/a750d4d926b4/pone.0195106.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f8e/5891005/ab8a6936bb4d/pone.0195106.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f8e/5891005/7f659a6f2705/pone.0195106.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f8e/5891005/cdccec1f7da8/pone.0195106.g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Information presentation through a head-worn display ("smart glasses") has a smaller influence on the temporal structure of gait variability during dual-task gait compared to handheld displays (paper-based system and smartphone).与手持显示器(基于纸质系统和智能手机)相比,通过头戴式显示器(“智能眼镜”)呈现信息对双任务步行时步态变异性的时间结构的影响较小。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 9;13(4):e0195106. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195106. eCollection 2018.
2
A head-worn display ("smart glasses") has adverse impacts on the dynamics of lateral position control during gait.头戴式显示器(“智能眼镜”)会对行走时的侧方位置控制动态产生不利影响。
Gait Posture. 2020 Sep;81:126-130. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.07.014. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
3
Cognitive control processes associated with successful gait performance in dual-task walking in healthy young adults.认知控制过程与健康年轻成年人双任务行走中的成功步态表现相关。
Psychol Res. 2020 Sep;84(6):1766-1776. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01184-4. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
4
Cognitive and visual demands, but not gross motor demand, of concurrent smartphone use affect laboratory and free-living gait among young and older adults.同时使用智能手机时的认知和视觉需求,而非大肌肉运动需求,会影响年轻人和老年人在实验室及日常生活中的步态。
Gait Posture. 2019 Feb;68:30-36. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.11.003. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
5
Specific smartphone usage and cognitive performance affect gait characteristics during free-living and treadmill walking.特定的智能手机使用情况和认知表现会影响自由行走和在跑步机上行走时的步态特征。
Gait Posture. 2018 May;62:415-421. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.04.007. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
6
Influence of cognitive and motor tasks using smartphone during gait: EMG and gait performance analysis - Dual-task study.使用智能手机进行认知和运动任务对步态的影响:肌电图和步态表现分析 - 双重任务研究。
Hum Mov Sci. 2023 Jun;89:103097. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2023.103097. Epub 2023 May 3.
7
Impacts of using a head-worn display on gait performance during level walking and obstacle crossing.使用头戴式显示器对平路行走和跨越障碍物时步态表现的影响。
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2018 Apr;39:142-148. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2018.02.007. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
8
Gait parameters are differently affected by concurrent smartphone-based activities with scaled levels of cognitive effort.步态参数受到基于智能手机的并发活动的不同影响,这些活动具有不同程度的认知努力。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 12;12(10):e0185825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185825. eCollection 2017.
9
The impact of walking while using a smartphone on pedestrians' awareness of roadside events.使用智能手机时行走对行人路边事件意识的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Apr;101:87-96. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.02.005. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
10
Gait stability and variability measures show effects of impaired cognition and dual tasking in frail people.步态稳定性和可变性测量显示出认知障碍和双重任务对虚弱人群的影响。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2011 Jan 17;8:2. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-8-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Emotional characteristic analysis of human gait while real-time movie viewing.实时观看电影时人类步态的情绪特征分析
Front Artif Intell. 2022 Oct 14;5:989860. doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.989860. eCollection 2022.
2
Exploration of different classes of metrics to characterize motor variability during repetitive symmetric and asymmetric lifting tasks.探究不同类别的指标,以描述重复对称和不对称举重任务中的运动变异性。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 8;9(1):9821. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46297-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Temporal changes in motor variability during prolonged lifting/lowering and the influence of work experience.长时间升降过程中运动变异性的时间变化以及工作经验的影响。
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2017 Dec;37:61-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
2
How humans use visual optic flow to regulate stepping during walking.人类如何利用视觉光流在行走过程中调节步幅。
Gait Posture. 2017 Sep;57:15-20. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.05.002. Epub 2017 May 8.
3
Local dynamic stability and gait variability during attentional tasks in young adults.
年轻人在注意力任务期间的局部动态稳定性和步态变异性
Gait Posture. 2017 Jun;55:105-108. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.04.019. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
4
Goal equivalent manifold analysis of task performance in non-specific LBP and healthy subjects during repetitive trunk movement: Effect of load, velocity, symmetry.非特异性下背痛患者和健康受试者在重复性躯干运动过程中任务表现的目标等效流形分析:负荷、速度、对称性的影响
Hum Mov Sci. 2017 Jan;51:72-81. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2016.11.005. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
5
Reading from computer screen versus reading from paper: does it still make a difference?在电脑屏幕上阅读与在纸质上阅读:这还有区别吗?
Ergonomics. 2016 May;59(5):615-32. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2015.1100757. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
6
Adaptability of stride-to-stride control of stepping movements in human walking.人类行走中步幅间控制的适应性
J Biomech. 2016 Jan 25;49(2):229-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.12.010. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
7
Intrinsic movement variability at work. How long is the path from motor control to design engineering?工作中的内在运动变异性。从运动控制到设计工程的道路有多长?
Appl Ergon. 2016 Mar;53 Pt A:71-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.08.014. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
8
Effects of concurrent physical and cognitive demands on muscle activity and heart rate variability in a repetitive upper-extremity precision task.重复性上肢精细任务中同时存在的身体和认知需求对肌肉活动及心率变异性的影响。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016 Jan;116(1):227-39. doi: 10.1007/s00421-015-3268-8. Epub 2015 Sep 24.
9
Texting while driving using Google Glass™: Promising but not distraction-free.使用谷歌眼镜™开车时发短信:有前景但并非没有干扰。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Aug;81:218-29. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.03.033. Epub 2015 May 26.
10
The aging brain shows less flexible reallocation of cognitive resources during dual-task walking: A mobile brain/body imaging (MoBI) study.衰老大脑在双任务步行过程中认知资源的重新分配灵活性降低:一项移动脑/体成像(MoBI)研究。
Neuroimage. 2015 Aug 15;117:230-42. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.028. Epub 2015 May 16.