Chair of Urban Water Systems Engineering, Technical University of Munich, Am Coulombwall 3, D-85748 Garching, Germany.
Kompetenzzentrum Wasser Berlin gGmbH, Cicerostrasse 24, D-10709 Berlin, Germany.
Water Res. 2018 Aug 1;139:118-131. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.03.042. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
This study provides an overview of established processes as well as recent progress in emerging technologies for advanced oxidation processes (AOPs). In addition to a discussion of major reaction mechanisms and formation of by-products, data on energy efficiency were collected in an extensive analysis of studies reported in the peer-reviewed literature enabling a critical comparison of various established and emerging AOPs based on electrical energy per order (E) values. Despite strong variations within reviewed E values, significant differences could be observed between three groups of AOPs: (1) O (often considered as AOP-like process), O/HO, O/UV, UV/HO, UV/persulfate, UV/chlorine, and electron beam represent median E values of <1 kWh/m, while median energy consumption by (2) photo-Fenton, plasma, and electrolytic AOPs were significantly higher (E values in the range of 1-100 kWh/m). (3) UV-based photocatalysis, ultrasound, and microwave-based AOPs are characterized by median values of >100 kWh/m and were therefore considered as not (yet) energy efficient AOPs. Specific evaluation of 147 data points for the UV/HO process revealed strong effects of operational conditions on reported E values. Besides water type and quality, a major influence was observed for process capacity (lab-vs. pilot-vs. full-scale applications) and, in case of UV-based processes, of the lamp type. However, due to the contribution of other factors, correlation of E values with specific water quality parameters such as UV absorbance and dissolved organic carbon were not substantial. Also, correlations between E and compound reactivity with OH-radicals were not significant (photolytically active compounds were not considered). Based on these findings, recommendations regarding the use of the E concept, including the upscaling of laboratory results, were derived.
本研究概述了高级氧化工艺(AOPs)中已建立的工艺以及新兴技术的最新进展。除了讨论主要反应机制和副产物的形成外,还在对同行评议文献中报道的研究进行广泛分析的基础上收集了关于能源效率的数据,使我们能够根据每阶电耗(E)值对各种已建立和新兴的 AOP 进行批判性比较。尽管审查的 E 值存在很大差异,但在三组 AOP 之间可以观察到显著差异:(1)O(通常被认为是 AOP 类似过程)、O/HO、O/UV、UV/HO、UV/过硫酸盐、UV/氯气和电子束代表 <1 kWh/m 的中值 E 值,而(2)光芬顿、等离子体和电解 AOP 的中值能耗显著更高(E 值在 1-100 kWh/m 范围内)。(3)基于 UV 的光催化、超声和微波 AOP 的中值值大于 100 kWh/m,因此被认为不是(尚未)节能的 AOP。对 UV/HO 工艺的 147 个数据点进行的特定评估表明,操作条件对报告的 E 值有很大影响。除了水的类型和质量外,还观察到过程容量(实验室-vs. 中试-vs. 全规模应用)的主要影响,以及在基于 UV 的工艺中,灯类型的主要影响。然而,由于其他因素的贡献,E 值与特定水质参数(如 UV 吸收率和溶解有机碳)之间的相关性不大。此外,E 值与 OH 自由基反应性之间的相关性也不显著(未考虑光解活性化合物)。基于这些发现,提出了关于 E 概念的使用建议,包括实验室结果的放大。