• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Automating Collection of Pain-Related Patient-Reported Outcomes to Enhance Clinical Care and Research.自动化采集与疼痛相关的患者报告结局数据,以增强临床护理和研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 May;33(Suppl 1):31-37. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4326-9.
2
Interdisciplinary team-based care for patients with chronic pain on long-term opioid treatment in primary care (PPACT) - Protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomized trial.基于跨学科团队的长程阿片类药物治疗慢性疼痛患者的初级保健管理(PPACT):一项实用的整群随机试验方案。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2018 Apr;67:91-99. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.02.015. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
3
Interactive Voice Response-Based Self-management for Chronic Back Pain: The COPES Noninferiority Randomized Trial.基于交互式语音应答的慢性背痛自我管理:COPES非劣效性随机试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jun 1;177(6):765-773. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0223.
4
Cooperative pain education and self-management (COPES): study design and protocol of a randomized non-inferiority trial of an interactive voice response-based self-management intervention for chronic low back pain.合作性疼痛教育与自我管理(COPES):一项针对慢性下腰痛的基于交互式语音应答的自我管理干预随机非劣效性试验的研究设计与方案
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Feb 16;17:85. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-0924-z.
5
The effect of EHR-integrated patient-reported outcomes on satisfaction with chronic pain care.电子健康记录(EHR)整合的患者报告结局对慢性疼痛护理满意度的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2016 Dec 1;22(12):e403-e408.
6
Treat the Patient, Not the Pain: Using a Multidimensional Assessment Tool to Facilitate Patient-Centered Chronic Pain Care.治疗患者,而非疼痛:使用多维评估工具促进以患者为中心的慢性疼痛护理。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Aug;33(8):1235-1238. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4456-0.
7
Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of an Integrative Pain Management Program in a Primary Care Safety-Net Clinic.初级保健安全网诊所综合疼痛管理项目的设计、实施与评估
J Altern Complement Med. 2019 Mar;25(S1):S78-S85. doi: 10.1089/acm.2018.0398.
8
The APPROACH trial: Assessing pain, patient-reported outcomes, and complementary and integrative health.APPROACH 试验:评估疼痛、患者报告的结局和补充与整合健康。
Clin Trials. 2020 Aug;17(4):351-359. doi: 10.1177/1740774520928399. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
9
Patient-Reported Outcomes of an Integrative Pain Management Program Implemented in a Primary Care Safety Net Clinic: a Quasi-experimental Study.在基层医疗安全网诊所实施的综合疼痛管理项目的患者报告结局:一项准实验研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Jul;34(7):1105-1107. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-04868-0.
10
Health Data Processes: A Framework for Analyzing and Discussing Efficient Use and Reuse of Health Data With a Focus on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.健康数据流程:一个分析和讨论健康数据有效使用与再利用的框架,重点关注患者报告的结局指标。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 May 21;21(5):e12412. doi: 10.2196/12412.

引用本文的文献

1
Electronic Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Primary Health Care: Mixed Methods Systematic Review.初级卫生保健中患者报告结局测量的电子实施:混合方法系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 5;27:e63639. doi: 10.2196/63639.
2
Suicide Risk Screening for Head and Neck Cancer Patients: An Implementation Study.头颈癌患者自杀风险筛查:一项实施研究。
Appl Clin Inform. 2024 Mar;15(2):404-413. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1787006. Epub 2024 May 22.
3
A Primary Care-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Intervention for Long-Term Opioid Users With Chronic Pain : A Randomized Pragmatic Trial.基于初级保健的认知行为疗法干预慢性疼痛长期阿片类药物使用者:一项随机实用试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2022 Jan;175(1):46-55. doi: 10.7326/M21-1436. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
4
Interactive group-based orientation sessions: A method to improve adherence and retention in pragmatic clinical trials.基于小组的互动式迎新培训课程:一种提高实用型临床试验中依从性和保留率的方法。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020 Jan 21;17:100527. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100527. eCollection 2020 Mar.
5
Feasibility of enhancing well-child visits with family nutrition and physical activity risk assessment on body mass index.通过家庭营养和身体活动风险评估来加强健康儿童体检对体重指数影响的可行性。
Obes Sci Pract. 2019 Apr 24;5(3):220-230. doi: 10.1002/osp4.339. eCollection 2019 Jun.
6
The Mediating Effect of Sleep Disturbance on the Relationship Between Nonmalignant Chronic Pain and Suicide Death.睡眠障碍在非恶性慢性疼痛与自杀死亡关系中的中介作用。
Pain Pract. 2019 Apr;19(4):382-389. doi: 10.1111/papr.12750. Epub 2019 Jan 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Primary Care of Patients With Chronic Pain.慢性疼痛患者的初级护理。
JAMA. 2017 Jun 20;317(23):2367-2368. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.5787.
2
Management of Chronic Pain in the Aftermath of the Opioid Backlash.阿片类药物抵制浪潮后的慢性疼痛管理
JAMA. 2017 Jun 20;317(23):2365-2366. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.4884.
3
Provider and patient perspectives on opioids and alternative treatments for managing chronic pain: a qualitative study.医疗服务提供者与患者对阿片类药物及慢性疼痛管理替代疗法的看法:一项定性研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Mar 24;17(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0566-0.
4
Collecting, Integrating, and Disseminating Patient-Reported Outcomes for Research in a Learning Healthcare System.在学习型医疗系统中收集、整合和传播患者报告结局用于研究
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2016 Jul 7;4(1):1240. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1240. eCollection 2016.
5
CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain - United States, 2016.美国 2016 年慢性疼痛阿片类药物处方指南。
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2016 Mar 18;65(1):1-49. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6501e1.
6
Symptom Monitoring With Patient-Reported Outcomes During Routine Cancer Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial.常规癌症治疗期间通过患者报告结局进行症状监测:一项随机对照试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Feb 20;34(6):557-65. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.0830. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
7
Intensity of Chronic Pain--The Wrong Metric?慢性疼痛的强度——指标有误?
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 26;373(22):2098-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1507136.
8
Overcoming barriers to implementing patient-reported outcomes in an electronic health record: a case report.克服在电子健康记录中实施患者报告结局的障碍:一例病例报告
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Jan;23(1):74-9. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv085. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
9
Estimates of pain prevalence and severity in adults: United States, 2012.2012年美国成年人疼痛患病率及严重程度估计
J Pain. 2015 Aug;16(8):769-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.05.002. Epub 2015 May 29.
10
Short-term variability in outpatient pain intensity scores in a national sample of older veterans with chronic pain.全国老年慢性疼痛退伍军人样本中门诊疼痛强度评分的短期变异性。
Pain Med. 2015 May;16(5):855-65. doi: 10.1111/pme.12643. Epub 2014 Dec 28.

自动化采集与疼痛相关的患者报告结局数据,以增强临床护理和研究。

Automating Collection of Pain-Related Patient-Reported Outcomes to Enhance Clinical Care and Research.

机构信息

Division of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Kaiser Permanente Center for Clinical and Outcomes Research, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2018 May;33(Suppl 1):31-37. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4326-9.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-018-4326-9
PMID:29633139
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5902345/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Chronic pain is highly prevalent, and the ability to routinely measure patients' pain and treatment response using validated patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessments is important to clinical care. Despite this recognition, systematic use in everyday clinical care is rare.

AIMS

The aims of this study were to (1) describe infrastructure designed to automate PRO data collection, (2) compare study-enhanced PRO completion rates to those in clinical care, and (3) evaluate patient response rates by method of PRO administration and sociodemographic and/or clinical characteristics.

SETTING

The Pain Program for Active Coping and Training (PPACT) is a pragmatic clinical trial conducted within three regions of the Kaiser Permanente health care system.

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

PPACT evaluates the effect of integrative primary care-based pain management services on outcomes for chronic pain patients on long-term opioid treatment. We implemented a tiered process for quarterly assessment of PROs to supplement clinical collection and ensure adequate trial data using three methods: web-based personal health records (PHR), automated interactive voice response (IVR) calls, and live outreach.

PROGRAM EVALUATION

Among a subset of PPACT participants examined (n = 632), the tiered study-enhanced PRO completion rates were higher than in clinical care: 96% completed ≥ 1 study-administered PRO with mean of 3.46 (SD = 0.85) vs. 74% completed in clinical care with a mean of 2.43 (SD = 2.08). Among all PPACT participants at 3 months (n = 831), PRO completion was 86% and analyses of response by key characteristics found only that participant age predicted an increased likelihood of responding to PHR and IVR outreach.

DISCUSSION

Adherence to pain-related PRO data collection using our enhanced tiered approach was high. No demographic or clinical identifiers other than age were associated with differential response by modality. Successful ancillary support should employ multimodal electronic health record functionalities for PRO administration. Using automated modalities is feasible and may facilitate better sustainability for regular PRO administration within health care systems. Clinical Trials Registration Number: NCT02113592.

摘要

简介

慢性疼痛的发病率很高,因此,使用经过验证的患者报告结局(PRO)评估工具来常规测量患者的疼痛和治疗反应,对临床护理非常重要。尽管已经认识到这一点,但在日常临床护理中系统使用 PRO 评估工具的情况仍然很少见。

目的

本研究的目的是:(1)描述用于自动采集 PRO 数据的基础设施;(2)比较增强型研究中 PRO 完成率与临床护理中的完成率;(3)通过 PRO 管理方式和患者人口统计学及/或临床特征来评估患者的应答率。

设置

Pain Program for Active Coping and Training(PPACT)是一项在 Kaiser Permanente 医疗保健系统的三个区域内进行的实用型临床试验。

项目描述

PPACT 评估了基于综合初级保健的疼痛管理服务对长期接受阿片类药物治疗的慢性疼痛患者结局的影响。我们实施了一个分层的流程,每季度评估一次 PRO,以补充临床采集,并使用三种方法确保有足够的试验数据:基于网络的个人健康记录(PHR)、自动交互式语音应答(IVR)电话和现场外展。

项目评估

在对 PPACT 参与者进行的亚组分析中(n=632),分层研究增强型 PRO 完成率高于临床护理:96%的参与者完成了≥1 项研究管理的 PRO,平均完成 3.46 次(SD=0.85),而在临床护理中,平均完成 2.43 次(SD=2.08)。在所有参加 3 个月研究的 PPACT 参与者中(n=831),PRO 完成率为 86%,对关键特征的应答分析发现,只有参与者年龄与对 PHR 和 IVR 外展的应答可能性增加有关。

讨论

使用我们增强的分层方法,对疼痛相关 PRO 数据采集的依从性很高。除年龄外,没有其他人口统计学或临床指标与不同的应答模式有关。成功的辅助支持应该采用多模态电子健康记录功能进行 PRO 管理。使用自动化模式是可行的,并且可能有助于在医疗保健系统内更可持续地进行常规 PRO 管理。临床试验注册号:NCT02113592。