Medtronic, Inc., Restorative Therapies Group, Research & Core Technology, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Physiological Research Laboratories, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Neuromodulation. 2019 Aug;22(6):684-689. doi: 10.1111/ner.12779. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
In rodents, we reported that short pulse-width (PW) neuromodulation might provide more efficient therapy delivery than traditional 0.21 msec PW. Using fully implanted, commercialized systems in the sheep, the goal of this study was to characterize the relationship of electromyographic (EMG) responses of the external anal sphincter (EAS) to different PWs of sacral neuromodulation (SNM).
In seven sheep, InterStim® quadripolar tined leads were implanted adjacent to the S3 nerve root bilaterally to deliver SNM and two pairs of intramuscular leads were placed on either side of the EAS for EMG sensing. The EMG responses to SNM with different PWs were examined using variable intensities in both anesthetized and conscious conditions.
The EMG responses from ipsilateral EAS (I ) and contralateral EAS (C ) were compared. The area under the curve of EMG responses from I were significantly stronger than that from C The late component EMGs were more sensitive to nerve stimulation with a higher response amplitude in awake sheep. The response threshold-PW relationship from the I as ascertained visually and with EMG in anesthetized and awake sheep were fitted with a monoexponential nonlinear regression; the resulting chronaxies were of 0.05 msec (n = 6), and 0.04 msec (n = 6), and 0.04 msec (n = 8), respectively.
In both anesthetized and awake conditions, a similar motor response may be evoked in the EAS at PWs much shorter (0.04-0.05 msec) than the 0.21 msec typically used with SNM. Potential battery savings manifested by shorter PW would provide more efficient therapy delivery and increased longevity of the stimulator.
在啮齿动物中,我们报道短脉宽 (PW) 神经调节可能比传统的 0.21 毫秒 PW 提供更有效的治疗输送。在绵羊中使用完全植入的商业化系统,本研究的目的是描述阴部外括约肌 (EAS) 的肌电图 (EMG) 反应与不同骶神经调节 (SNM) PW 的关系。
在 7 只绵羊中,双侧将 InterStim® 四极叉状导联植入 S3 神经根附近,以传递 SNM,并在 EAS 的每一侧放置两对肌内导联进行 EMG 感应。在麻醉和清醒状态下,使用不同的强度检查不同 PW 的 SNM 对 EMG 的反应。
比较了同侧 EAS (I) 和对侧 EAS (C) 的 EMG 反应。I 的 EMG 反应曲线下面积明显强于 C 的 EMG 反应曲线下面积。在清醒绵羊中,迟发成分 EMG 对神经刺激更敏感,反应幅度更高。在麻醉和清醒绵羊中,通过视觉和 EMG 确定的 I 的反应阈值-PW 关系用单指数非线性回归拟合;得出的时值分别为 0.05 毫秒 (n=6)、0.04 毫秒 (n=6) 和 0.04 毫秒 (n=8)。
在麻醉和清醒状态下,EAS 可能会在比 SNM 通常使用的 0.21 毫秒短得多的 PW (0.04-0.05 毫秒) 下引起类似的运动反应。较短 PW 带来的潜在电池节省将提供更有效的治疗输送,并延长刺激器的使用寿命。