Duke University.
Dev Psychopathol. 2019 May;31(2):557-571. doi: 10.1017/S0954579418000093. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
Child maltreatment is a major cause of pediatric posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Previous studies have not investigated potential differences in network architecture in maltreated youth with PTSD and those resilient to PTSD. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging brain scans at 3 T were completed in maltreated youth with PTSD (n = 31), without PTSD (n = 32), and nonmaltreated controls (n = 57). Structural covariance network architecture was derived from between-subject intraregional correlations in measures of cortical thickness in 148 cortical regions (nodes). Interregional positive partial correlations controlling for demographic variables were assessed, and those correlations that exceeded specified thresholds constituted connections in cortical brain networks. Four measures of network centrality characterized topology, and the importance of cortical regions (nodes) within the network architecture were calculated for each group. Permutation testing and principle component analysis method were employed to calculate between-group differences. Principle component analysis is a methodological improvement to methods used in previous brain structural covariance network studies. Differences in centrality were observed between groups. Larger centrality was found in maltreated youth with PTSD in the right posterior cingulate cortex; smaller centrality was detected in the right inferior frontal cortex compared to youth resilient to PTSD and controls, demonstrating network characteristics unique to pediatric maltreatment-related PTSD. Larger centrality was detected in right frontal pole in maltreated youth resilient to PTSD compared to youth with PTSD and controls, demonstrating structural covariance network differences in youth resilience to PTSD following maltreatment. Smaller centrality was found in the left posterior cingulate cortex and in the right inferior frontal cortex in maltreated youth compared to controls, demonstrating attributes of structural covariance network topology that is unique to experiencing maltreatment. This work is the first to identify cortical thickness-based structural covariance network differences between maltreated youth with and without PTSD. We demonstrated network differences in both networks unique to maltreated youth with PTSD and those resilient to PTSD. The networks identified are important for the successful attainment of age-appropriate social cognition, attention, emotional processing, and inhibitory control. Our findings in maltreated youth with PTSD versus those without PTSD suggest vulnerability mechanisms for developing PTSD.
儿童虐待是儿童创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的主要原因。先前的研究尚未调查 PTSD 受虐待青年与对 PTSD 有弹性的青年之间网络结构的潜在差异。在 3T 高分辨率磁共振成像脑部扫描中,完成了患有 PTSD(n=31)、无 PTSD(n=32)和未受虐待的对照组(n=57)受虐待的青年。结构协方差网络结构是从 148 个皮质区域(节点)的皮质厚度的个体间区域内相关性中得出的。评估了控制人口统计学变量的区域间正部分相关,并且超过指定阈值的那些相关性构成了皮质脑网络中的连接。四个网络中心度度量用于描述拓扑结构,并且计算了每个组中网络结构内皮质区域(节点)的重要性。置换检验和主成分分析方法用于计算组间差异。主成分分析是对以前的大脑结构协方差网络研究中使用的方法的改进。在组间观察到中心度的差异。在 PTSD 受虐待的青年中,右后扣带回皮质的中心度较大;与对 PTSD 有弹性的青年和对照组相比,右额下回皮质的中心度较小,这表明了与儿科虐待相关 PTSD 特有的网络特征。与 PTSD 青年和对照组相比,在对 PTSD 有弹性的受虐待青年中,右额极的中心度更大,这表明了在遭受虐待后,对 PTSD 有弹性的青年的结构协方差网络差异。与对照组相比,在受虐待的青年中,左后扣带回皮质和右额下回皮质的中心度较小,这表明了经历虐待的结构协方差网络拓扑的独特属性。这项工作是首次在 PTSD 受虐待和未受虐待的青年之间确定皮质厚度为基础的结构协方差网络差异。我们证明了 PTSD 受虐待青年和对 PTSD 有弹性的青年特有的网络差异。所确定的网络对于成功获得与年龄相关的社会认知、注意力、情绪处理和抑制控制至关重要。我们在 PTSD 受虐待青年与无 PTSD 青年中的发现表明了 PTSD 发展的脆弱性机制。